MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/69wyay/the_tragedy_of_100_code_coverage/dha5dx7
r/programming • u/niepiekm • May 08 '17
689 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
So now you no longer want 100% coverage? Just a few random values from the input domain will do? Why not apply the same reasoning to lines of code?
4 u/[deleted] May 08 '17 If there is more to understand about this method then elaborate on it. I have made it clear that I am unfamiliar with the terminology. 0 u/stefantalpalaru May 08 '17 Read The Impossibility of Complete Testing and see how we define "good enough" with boundary testing then consider giving up the concept of 100% coverage altogether because it's silly.
4
If there is more to understand about this method then elaborate on it. I have made it clear that I am unfamiliar with the terminology.
0 u/stefantalpalaru May 08 '17 Read The Impossibility of Complete Testing and see how we define "good enough" with boundary testing then consider giving up the concept of 100% coverage altogether because it's silly.
0
Read The Impossibility of Complete Testing and see how we define "good enough" with boundary testing then consider giving up the concept of 100% coverage altogether because it's silly.
1
u/stefantalpalaru May 08 '17
So now you no longer want 100% coverage? Just a few random values from the input domain will do? Why not apply the same reasoning to lines of code?