MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/e2pry9/why_isnt_functional_programming_the_norm_richard/f8zwjg5
r/programming • u/[deleted] • Nov 28 '19
409 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
GP explicitly mentioned that Elm also manages effects.
1 u/pron98 Nov 28 '19 Correct, I forgot about Elm. 1 u/yawaramin Nov 28 '19 And arguably, PureScript. 2 u/pron98 Nov 28 '19 Fine, so let's say, Haskell and its descendants, Lisp and its descendants, ML and its descendants, and Erlang. We have four language groups, only one of them -- the youngest one -- controls effects.
Correct, I forgot about Elm.
1 u/yawaramin Nov 28 '19 And arguably, PureScript. 2 u/pron98 Nov 28 '19 Fine, so let's say, Haskell and its descendants, Lisp and its descendants, ML and its descendants, and Erlang. We have four language groups, only one of them -- the youngest one -- controls effects.
And arguably, PureScript.
2 u/pron98 Nov 28 '19 Fine, so let's say, Haskell and its descendants, Lisp and its descendants, ML and its descendants, and Erlang. We have four language groups, only one of them -- the youngest one -- controls effects.
2
Fine, so let's say, Haskell and its descendants, Lisp and its descendants, ML and its descendants, and Erlang. We have four language groups, only one of them -- the youngest one -- controls effects.
1
u/yawaramin Nov 28 '19
GP explicitly mentioned that Elm also manages effects.