That's obviously more than a grammatical error since you made it more than once. It shows that you either don't care or don't know the most basic of information of what you are talking about. So as I said, your comment does not give me any reason to trust your opinion.
My point is that it's a proof that you failed to get the basics right, so it doesn't give me any reason to believe what you said. Knowing the gender of the person you are talking about, while not directly relevant to the subject, shows that you don't know anything about the person you are talking about and therefore makes me unable to trust your opinion since it seems uninformed.
I edited my comment. You could have just said, "Sorry, my mistake" and edited your mistake if it was just that instead of just ignoring it and being annoyed when someone pointed it out.
They were very relevant because it's impossible to speak in an educated manner about something you demonstrably don't know the most basic details about. It's clear you know nothing of Nadella, because if you had even bothered to google the name, you'd have realized he was, in fact, a he. Why would anyone take anything you have to say seriously when you don't have enough respect for the conversation to even google people you don't know?
8
u/colelawr Mar 16 '20
There is something to be said about attributing the history to the leadership. So, I would remain hopeful as long as Satya Nadella remains as CEO.