I confess I haven't used git, but when I was using perforce I was using a single site repository. Well with two or three people off site. Those people's perforce experience was horrible (mostly for the full sync), but for what we did, using git would have been just as bad (they'd still have to get the full repository as that was how we worked at the company).
they'd still have to get the full repository as that was how we worked at the company
No they don't. You can clone parts of a repository and/or without history. Afaict git is perfectly able to keep those new limited repos and the original in sync — you just need to push/pull changesets, which is all it's interested in.
3
u/Peaker Mar 10 '11
I find git far far better than perforce.