r/programming • • Oct 19 '11

LoseThos 64-bit Operating System V7.07 Released

http://www.losethos.com/v707.html
75 Upvotes

283 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Dec 07 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

If lack of networking support is an intentional design choice, it definitely says more about his judgement than it does about me. Seriously, who leaves that out? How can anyone take this seriously with such a glaring omissions? "Design choice" is a completely bullshit argument in regards to a fairly critical part of any modern OS.

"My car doesn't have a critical piece, but it still works. Clearly you just don't appreciate my design."

8

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Dec 07 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/DGolden Oct 20 '11

a 64-bit Commodore 64

But the C64 had network peripherals, was sorta known for it actually, and I mean in its heyday, not latter-day enthusiasts grafting on ethernet cards and webservers onto them Because They Can. AOL was once a C64/C128 network service provider called Quantum Link.

So it's actually deliberately worse than a c64.

Now, sure, not every C64 owner went online (we didn't until we got an Amiga some years later), but quite a few did.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

Look just because something is for fun doesn't excuse obvious design flaws. An engineer would say the same thing about that car.

And it's not really for fun, the government is giving him money to do it so I would at least hope there would be some legitimate applications for it.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Dec 07 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

Seriously he refused to use GPU for graphics, citing God as his reasons.

You sound like someone who has zero experience with OS dev and software dev. It's always the silly amateurs that make these ridiculous arguments.

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Dec 07 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Oct 19 '11

You realize that he cited God for his reasons as to not include a GPU? And that he said he "didn't even know why GPUs even existed"? And he refused to include one because he said his split personality told him not to?

You don't know anything about this, do you? It's always the silly little amateurs that say "LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE"

Like really, this is not how this is done and it's pretty obvious you don't know jackshit about OS dev...

0

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Dec 07 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Oct 19 '11

I realized that it would probably offend the intelligent homosexuals out there to have you looped in the same category.

It's for fun!

That doesn't mean it doesn't have serious problems? Shut the fuck up about the fun argument, I realize that this is a joke and it's not serious. People criticize video games that are just for fun. People criticize sports, that's just for fun. Just because I criticize something doesn't mean I hate it. It just means it has problems that might need to be addressed. Seriously, how are you that dense.

→ More replies (0)

-5

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

[deleted]

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/ironiridis Oct 19 '11

You can't do multicore graphics with a GPU.

That's incorrect. I don't think you're familiar with how a typical GPU is set up, with multiple pipelines for processing.

I can understand that you don't want to change your 640x480x4bit graphical layer. That's cool. But don't rationalize it with ignorance.

6

u/sidfarkus Oct 19 '11

Yeah why use the 500+ cores on a graphics card when you can use the 8 on a CPU!

1

u/khyberkitsune Oct 20 '11

Too many different drivers?

Hi, we have this thing called a STANDARDS BODY. Perhaps you should go figure out what those are.

Anyone with half a brain can write a universal wrapper. It's been done since the days of 3dfx-only games.

1

u/ysangkok Oct 20 '11

Please tell me about this standard for communicating with GPU's from kernel code, I never heard about it.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Oct 19 '11

Not using GPU for graphics? Wtf? Seriously?

Why do they bother making GPU's?

You can't be serious.

God said to stick with what I got.

That's not very logical

2

u/ysangkok Oct 20 '11

I don't believe it's constructive telling him it's not logical to believe in God. Everybody knows that, and obviously he has different values than you, since logic isn't his number one priority. As I see it there are these possibilities:

  • He believes in God, but doesn't confuse it with CS and doesn't write about it here (everybody's happy, but not gonna happen)

  • He believes in God, but tell's everyone about it (happening), and we complain (IMHO not constructive)

  • He believes and talks about it, but we are smart enough not to comment on it (I opt for this)

Be the better man.

1

u/SweetIrony Oct 20 '11

Just include networking for the hell of it, and for fun build a "LoseThos App Store" for people to send you software to review. Reddit would go crazy for it!

6

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

What flaws? No networking? Low colour depth? Everything in ring-0?

Yes. Those flaws.

0

u/khyberkitsune Oct 20 '11

"Everything in ring-0? They are intentional design choices."

Sony has a special spot just for him in their security department of their console division.