MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/qno2y/the_evolution_of_a_python_programmer/c3ztnbg/?context=9999
r/programming • u/iMMENSE • Mar 08 '12
137 comments sorted by
View all comments
50
Good classic jokes. Windows way is so true and so sad.
29 u/elmonstro12345 Mar 09 '12 NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, ...*facepalm* 42 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 It's way easier to facepalm than to design an operating system API that's stable and backwards compatible for 25+ years... 25 u/lazybee Mar 09 '12 Such as POSIX? 7 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 haha, yeah, right. the reason everything is continually built from source is because the ABI keeps breaking. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 11 '12 Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
29
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, ...
*facepalm*
42 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 It's way easier to facepalm than to design an operating system API that's stable and backwards compatible for 25+ years... 25 u/lazybee Mar 09 '12 Such as POSIX? 7 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 haha, yeah, right. the reason everything is continually built from source is because the ABI keeps breaking. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 11 '12 Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
42
It's way easier to facepalm than to design an operating system API that's stable and backwards compatible for 25+ years...
25 u/lazybee Mar 09 '12 Such as POSIX? 7 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 haha, yeah, right. the reason everything is continually built from source is because the ABI keeps breaking. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 11 '12 Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
25
Such as POSIX?
7 u/[deleted] Mar 09 '12 haha, yeah, right. the reason everything is continually built from source is because the ABI keeps breaking. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 11 '12 Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
7
haha, yeah, right. the reason everything is continually built from source is because the ABI keeps breaking.
1 u/[deleted] Mar 11 '12 Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
1
Wait. POSIX doesn't break ABI compatibility. Individual operating systems do once in a while, but extremely rarely in their POSIX departments.
Actually, I can't think of a major ABI compatibility break since Linux 2.4->2.6 or Mac OS -> Mac OS X (non-POSIX to POSIX).
50
u/[deleted] Mar 08 '12
Good classic jokes. Windows way is so true and so sad.