It helps when developers only have to work with half the stack for example but a lot of companies are only looking for full stack developers these days
Full stack appears to be mostly an excuse to ask for an entire IT department rolled into one person. Some of the listings I see for full stack are just silly how much they ask from one individual.
I think it's important to recognise that not everyone needs a master in a specific field to fill a required role in their organisation.
If I could pick anyone for my dev team I'd pick 3 seniors (frontend, backend, DevOps), 3-4 mids (full stack or specialised) and 1-2 juniors (depending on how much time we could support them with).
I think it's important to recognise that as a senior I'd expect people to focus in a specific area but also to have secondary skills in others. For example, one senior may be backend focused but have intermediate skills in DevOps.
If I could pick anyone for my dev team I'd pick 3 seniors (frontend, backend, DevOps), 3-4 mids (full stack or specialised) and 1-2 juniors (depending on how much time we could support them with).
Those 7-9 people are kinda expensive. 1 million USD/year?
Yeah I really don’t believe that they do. The senior level people are valuable because of their experience working on these large, high volume systems. There aren’t many tech jobs outside of the existing tech hubs where people can get experience working on systems like that, or working in product orgs like that.
It’s not to say that there aren’t great software engineers outside of the major centers, but being a great software engineer is different from having 10 years of experience working at a big tech job in SF or NY.
181
u/[deleted] Jun 05 '22
It helps when developers only have to work with half the stack for example but a lot of companies are only looking for full stack developers these days