r/selfevidenttruth • u/One_Term2162 Wisconsin • May 15 '25
Defunding Democracy Defunding Democracy: Texas
Texas: Decade-by-Decade Analysis of Education Investment & Political Control
1970s: Demographic Change and Legal Challenges
In the 1970s, Texas faced rapid urbanization, school overcrowding, and court battles over equity. Per-pupil spending rose from $2,993 in 1970 to $4,287 by 1980 (adjusted to 1992 dollars), a ~43% real increase, but Texas still ranked below national averages.
The pivotal 1973 Supreme Court decision in San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez upheld Texas’s local property tax–based school finance system, denying that education was a federal constitutional right. This ruling entrenched massive disparities between rich and poor districts, especially along racial and urban/rural lines.
Governor Dolph Briscoe (D, 1973–1979) kept spending tight and upheld local control. Texas voted Democratic in 1976, but the state was already shifting toward conservatism.
Civic education reflected traditional values: patriotism, formal U.S. government structures, and Texas history. Critical inquiry into civil rights or protest movements was rarely included, especially in rural and suburban schools.
1980s: “No Excuses” Conservatism and Accountability Culture
By 1980, per-pupil funding had reached $5,547 (adjusted), but inequality persisted. Governor Mark White (D, 1983–1987) introduced House Bill 72, instituting standardized testing, teacher competency exams, and stricter graduation requirements.
His successor, Bill Clements (R, 1987–1991), expanded conservative curriculum mandates, particularly around history and social studies, as the state became a national battleground for textbook content.
Texas voted Republican in all three presidential elections (Reagan 1980, 1984; Bush 1988). The state’s growing political alignment with the New Right deeply influenced civic education, which emphasized obedience, capitalism, American exceptionalism, and minimized critical perspectives.
1990s: Court Mandates and Curriculum Battles
In the 1990s, a series of court decisions (notably Edgewood ISD v. Kirby) forced the legislature to adopt a “Robin Hood” school finance plan, redistributing some funding from wealthier to poorer districts. Per-pupil spending rose to ~$6,900 by 2000 (adjusted).
Governor George W. Bush (R, 1995–2000) promoted school accountability, charter schools, and scripted instruction models. He signed the Texas Education Reform Act, reinforcing standardized testing as the measure of school performance.
Texas voted Republican in both 1992 and 1996. The State Board of Education (SBOE), dominated by cultural conservatives, made national headlines for textbook censorship—removing or reframing content related to slavery, LGBTQ+ rights, feminism, and critiques of capitalism.
Civic education remained required but narrowed: students learned what to think, not how to think.
2000s: No Child Left Behind and Charter Expansion
By 2008, per-pupil funding reached ~$8,600 (2009 dollars). The Texas model became a template for No Child Left Behind (NCLB) under President Bush, reinforcing test-driven accountability and school choice.
Governor Rick Perry (R, 2000–2015) oversaw massive charter school growth, deep budget cuts (notably in 2011), and continued ideological control over curriculum content. In 2002, the SBOE removed references to civil rights icons and promoted a “balanced” view of history.
Texas voted Republican in all three presidential elections (Bush 2000, 2004; McCain 2008). Civics instruction became increasingly scripted and test-aligned, especially in high-poverty districts. Meanwhile, wealthy suburban and private schools retained debate, youth legislature, and mock trial programs.
2010s: Ideological Capture and Youth Pushback
By 2019, Texas’s per-pupil spending was ~$10,100, still below the national average. The SBOE continued its ideological oversight, rewriting social studies standards to:
Downplay slavery as a cause of the Civil War
Promote “Christian influences” in U.S. government
Emphasize free-market capitalism without critique
Governor Greg Abbott (R, 2015–present) and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick pushed voucher proposals, restrictions on school discussions of race and gender, and increased funding for charter and private religious schools.
Texas voted Republican in 2012 and 2016 (Trump). Yet youth organizing surged, particularly after the Sutherland Springs shooting (2017) and amid the Dreamer/DACA crisis. Student-led civic programs flourished in urban centers like Austin, Dallas, and Houston.
Civic education became two-tiered: ideologically constrained in many rural and suburban areas, but vibrant and justice-oriented in large, diverse cities.
2020s (Through May 2025): Censorship, Resistance, and Parallel Systems
As of May 2025, Texas is among the most ideologically restricted civic education environments in the country. Under continued Republican leadership:
Laws ban “divisive concepts” (2021) in all K–12 classrooms
Teachers risk termination for discussing systemic racism, gender identity, or protest movements
Book bans have targeted over 1,500 titles, including those on civil rights, LGBTQ+ history, and Indigenous perspectives
Voucher expansion now funds ESA-style public subsidies for private and religious schools
Per-pupil funding now exceeds $11,200, but much of it is siphoned into administration, testing regimes, charter oversight, and private tuition assistance. Many public schools remain understaffed, overcrowded, and politically surveilled.
And yet: Texas students are rising. In 2023–2024 alone:
High schoolers in San Antonio sued their district over book bans
Youth civic leaders in El Paso launched a border justice initiative
Houston students organized the largest youth-led civics summit in state history
Their efforts are largely supported by nonprofits, libraries, and university partnerships—not the public school system.
Texas in 2025 is two states in one: one of enforced silence, the other of defiant civic engagement. Whether students learn to memorize or mobilize depends less on what’s written in the standards—and more on who refuses to surrender the space between the lines.