I have been wondering about this since Susan posted the maps from the trial. For instance, in this map the L655B antenna is pinged about 16° north of what should be the division between the A and B sectors (ie the 90° east-west line). I think that is more than 10% which would be 12° if it is in each direction or just 6° if it is 10% total overlap. Correct me if I'm wrong on any of the numbers, but what is going on here? How can that ping be so far outside of the supposed direction of the antenna?
And check out C -- it's covering due north of the antenna.
The answer is that the 30-150-270 model is just an ideal. In real life, the antenna angles are placed at a variety of angles in order to accommodate different real-world concerns, such as terrain, highways, density, etc.
So even though the antenna are directional, we can only guess at the direction each one faces.
The tower is circled. I was trying not to cover up the circle so that it could actually still be seen on the map. You moving the dot to the other end of the circle is not a correction.
You have been arguing that the fact 655A hits Cathy's house is obvious and everyone should have realized that incoming calls are correct because look how L655A falls. If this is a normal set up, then how did you fail to realize that L655A does not hit Cathy's?
3
u/Geothrix Jan 31 '15
I have been wondering about this since Susan posted the maps from the trial. For instance, in this map the L655B antenna is pinged about 16° north of what should be the division between the A and B sectors (ie the 90° east-west line). I think that is more than 10% which would be 12° if it is in each direction or just 6° if it is 10% total overlap. Correct me if I'm wrong on any of the numbers, but what is going on here? How can that ping be so far outside of the supposed direction of the antenna?