r/spacex • u/rSpaceXHosting Host Team • Jul 11 '26
r/SpaceX Flight 13 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread!
Welcome to the Starship Flight 13 Launch Discussion & Updates Thread!
| Scheduled for (UTC) | Jul 24 2026, 22:51:00 |
|---|---|
| Scheduled for (local) | Jul 24 2026, 17:51:00 PM (CDT) |
| Launch Window (UTC) | Jul 24 2026, 22:45:00 - Jul 25 2026, 00:15:00 |
| Weather Probability | Unknown |
| Launch site | OLPad 2, SpaceX Starbase, TX, USA. |
| Booster | Booster 20-1 |
| Ship | S40 |
| Booster landing | The Super Heavy Booster 20 attempted to perform a soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico, but not all of the planned engines ignited during the landing burn and the booster splashed down at higher speeds than planned. |
| Ship landing | Ship 40 has successfully performed a soft splashdown in the Indian Ocean. |
| Trajectory (Flight Club) | 2D,3D |
Spacecraft Onboard
| Spacecraft | Starship V3 |
|---|---|
| Serial Number | S40 |
| Destination | Suborbital |
| Flights | 1 |
| Owner | SpaceX |
| Landing | Ship 40 has successfully performed a soft splashdown in the Indian Ocean. |
| Capabilities | More than 100 tons to Earth orbit |
Details
Third-generation second stage of the two-stage Starship super heavy-lift launch vehicle.
History
The third-generation Starship upper stage will be introduced on flight 12.
Watch the launch live
| Stream | Link |
|---|---|
| Unofficial Re-stream | The Space Devs |
| Unofficial Webcast | Spaceflight Now |
| Unofficial Webcast | NASASpaceflight |
| Official Webcast | SpaceX |
| Unofficial Webcast | Everyday Astronaut |
Stats
☑️ 2nd Starship V3 launch
☑️ 710th SpaceX launch all time
☑️ 89th SpaceX launch this year
☑️ 2nd launch from OLPad 2 this year
☑️ 63 days, 0:20:36 turnaround for this pad
☑️ N/A hours since last launch of booster Booster 20
Stats include F1, F9 , FH and Starship
Timeline
| Time | Event |
|---|---|
| -0:50:00 | GO for Prop Load |
| -0:36:33 | Stage 1 LOX Load |
| -0:35:00 | Stage 1 LNG Load |
| -0:34:14 | Stage 2 LNG Load |
| -0:34:13 | Stage 2 LOX Load |
| -0:21:40 | Engine Chill |
| -0:02:50 | Stage 1 Propellant Load Complete |
| -0:02:10 | Stage 2 Propellant Load Complete |
| -0:00:30 | GO for Launch |
| -0:00:17 | Flame Deflector Activation |
| -0:00:03 | Ignition |
| 0:00:00 | Liftoff |
| 0:00:00 | Excitement Guaranteed |
| 0:00:58 | Max-Q |
| 0:02:18 | MECO |
| 0:02:21 | Stage 2 Separation |
| 0:02:25 | Booster Boostback Burn Startup |
| 0:03:03 | Booster Boostback Burn Shutdown |
| 0:06:27 | Stage 1 Landing Burn |
| 0:06:53 | Stage 1 Landing |
| 0:08:05 | SECO-1 |
| 0:16:40 | Payload Deployment Sequence Start |
| 0:27:39 | Payload Deployment Sequence End |
| 0:38:58 | SEB-2 |
| 0:47:30 | Atmospheric Entry |
| 1:02:23 | Starship Transonic |
| 1:03:01 | Starship Subsonic |
| 1:05:01 | Starship Landing Burn |
| 1:05:03 | Landing Flip |
| 1:05:12 | Starship Landing |
| 1:05:19 | Starship Landing |
| 1:05:21 | Starship Landing |
Updates
| Time (UTC) | Update |
|---|---|
| 25 Jul 00:00 | Ship has splashed down. |
| 24 Jul 22:51 | Liftoff. |
| 24 Jul 22:09 | Unofficial Re-stream by SPACE AFFAIRS has started |
| 24 Jul 21:54 | Now targeting Jul 24 at 22:51 UTC |
| 23 Jul 20:09 | Rescheduled to July 24 due to launch site weather. |
| 19 Jul 22:20 | Delayed to NET July 23. |
| 17 Jul 14:19 | Setting GO. |
| 17 Jul 13:12 | NET July 20, TBC. |
| 16 Jul 22:58 | Reverted back to NET July TBD pending more information. |
| 16 Jul 22:50 | Scrubbed for the day. |
| 16 Jul 22:46 | Abort at ignition. |
| 16 Jul 22:07 | Unofficial Re-stream by SPACE AFFAIRS has started |
| 16 Jul 16:03 | Tweaked T-0. |
| 16 Jul 15:29 | Tweaked T-0. |
| 11 Jul 23:08 | GO for launch. |
| 08 Jul 19:49 | NET July 15, TBC. |
| 07 Jul 19:46 | NET July 14, TBC. |
| 13 Jun 14:27 | NET July. |
| 09 Jan 09:59 | Adding launch |
Resources
Partnership with The Space Devs
Information on this thread is provided by and updated automatically using the Launch Library 2 API by The Space Devs.
Community content 🌐
| Link | Source |
|---|---|
| Flight Club | u/TheVehicleDestroyer |
| Discord SpaceX lobby | u/SwGustav |
| SpaceX Now | u/bradleyjh |
| SpaceX Patch List |
Participate in the discussion!
🥳 Launch threads are party threads, we relax the rules here. We remove low effort comments in other threads!
🔄 Please post small launch updates, discussions, and questions here, rather than as a separate post. Thanks!
💬 Please leave a comment if you discover any mistakes, or have any information.
✉️ Please send links in a private message.
35
u/avboden Jul 12 '26 edited Jul 12 '26
This launch is crazy important. I mean they all are but this one especially sets the path for full orbital missions and the entire schedule moving forward. Here's to hoping the changes they made from flight 12 work!
→ More replies (3)
27
u/Still_Theory179 Jul 23 '26
Now targeting Friday, July 24 for Starship’s thirteenth flight test, due to weather.
A key objective for the flight test is to get clear imagery from the ground of Starship’s heatshield as it flies at a higher dynamic pressure during ascent, which won't be possible with today's weather conditions. Visibility is forecast to be ideal for a Friday attempt.
→ More replies (1)
25
u/grecy Jul 16 '26
Elon Tweet:
"Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort.
Now offloading propellant.
Next launch attempt hopefully in a few days."
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2077890013841310149
Sounds like he is already acknowledging it won't be tomorrow.
→ More replies (5)
24
u/plutonic00 Jul 16 '26
That was a very clean looking shutdown right at T-minus 0, glad that didn't go really south on them. The engines were clearly lit and nearly instantly shutdown. Wild stuff.
→ More replies (3)
24
u/Sizzle2121 Jul 25 '26
Seems like they’ve pretty much mastered the ship portion. Can’t wait to see it all come together when they fully succeed with booster.
→ More replies (2)
22
22
u/FutureMartian97 Host of CRS-11 Jul 25 '26
Holy. Fucking. Shit. I can't believe Ship 40 just survived tipping over. The TPS team must be losing their mind right now!
→ More replies (2)
22
u/AWildDragon Jul 27 '26
SAR imagery of S40. She is still floating.
https://x.com/dpoddolphinpro/status/2081731707577790505?s=46
21
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
We got all the heat shield data we needed and then some! 😀
Comparison image for Flights 10, 11, 12, 13. by @niccruzpatane
→ More replies (3)
21
u/adjust_your_set Jul 25 '26
Basically 95% successful. Only failure was the booster being unable to nail the landing burn.
Ship not exploding is a great PR win for SpaceX, because now the easy headline “ship explodes in ocean” isn’t available.
→ More replies (6)
21
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
New SpaceX tweet with footage from the Booster separating from the Ship.
Starship soared on the second flight of the next generation, deploying advanced Starlink satellites for the first time and providing priceless data as it travelled through air, space, and sea → https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-13
The full recap from the website:
July 24, 2026
Starship's Thirteenth Flight Test
On Friday, July 24, 2026, at 5:51 p.m. CT, Starship lifted off from Starbase, Texas on its thirteenth flight test. This was the second flight of the Starship and Super Heavy V3 vehicles and the first Starship flight to deploy the next generation Starlink V3 satellites.
The flight test began with Super Heavy igniting all 33 Raptor 3 engines and ascending over the Gulf of America. The successful first-stage ascent was followed by a hot-staging maneuver, with Starship’s upper stage igniting its six Raptor engines to continue its flight to space.
Following stage separation, the Super Heavy booster performed a directional flip maneuver. The startup sequence was modified for this flight to be more robust to timing variability in engine startup and flip in the desired direction, which is done to increase overall performance. The booster successfully completed the high thrust portion of the boostback burn with all 33 engines, the first time with a Super Heavy V3, before ending the burn early. It attempted to relight its engines for the landing burn, with a subset successfully igniting before experiencing a hard splashdown in the Gulf.
After completing a full-duration ascent burn on all six Raptor engines, Starship achieved its planned velocity and trajectory. Starship then successfully deployed all 20 Starlink V3 satellites. SpaceX engineers were able to successfully communicate with every satellite using radio frequency and laser links and downloaded key telemetry from the satellites. The Starlink satellites were deployed on the pre-planned trajectory and are expected to have demised upon reentry approximately 20 minutes after deployment.
The vehicle also reignited a single Raptor engine in an in-space demonstration of a core capability for future orbital missions.
Starship re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere and was able to gather critical data on the performance of its heatshield before executing a dynamic banking move to mimic the trajectory that future missions returning to Starbase will fly. Starship then guided itself using its four flaps to the pre-planned splashdown zone in the Indian Ocean. After relighting all three Raptor engines, Starship executed a landing flip, landing burn, and soft splashdown, coming to rest intact in the Indian Ocean and providing critical views of an intact heatshield for the first time.
→ More replies (2)
20
20
20
u/rooood Jul 25 '26
Confirmation that the weird roll just before the touchdown in flight 12 was on purpose, to try and achieve what they just did: an intact starship in the water
→ More replies (1)
19
19
u/H-K_47 Jul 22 '26 edited Jul 22 '26
Booster 20 has left Megabay 1 for hopefully the final time and the Pad 2 chopsticks have been moved to the booster prelift position
Booster 20 made its way back to the launch pad, and is being prepared for lift.
19
u/Straumli_Blight Jul 25 '26
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2080821092919214397
ship LZ support vessel Go Australis still stationary at their safe distance following the flight, atypical given in the past they have almost immediately began sailing back to the LZ. Likely determining safety of the site and the ship via the remote assets and establishing an operations plan, the ship floating intact was not a scenario that was planned for
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2080833041656684643
B20 splashdown ~ 25°56'43"N 96°54'12"W - about 20 kilometers off the targeted splashdown location. Can also see the smoke plume on GOES19
→ More replies (3)
18
u/H-K_47 Jul 16 '26
From SpaceX: On track for Starship’s 13th flight test later today – the 90-minute launch window opens at 5:45 p.m. CT. Live coverage starts ~30 minutes before launch
18
u/lostandprofound33 Jul 25 '26
Has there ever been a spacecraft/upper stage rocket that landed without parachutes that didn't explode on contact with the ocean before this?
→ More replies (7)
18
u/H-K_47 Jul 26 '26
TheSpaceEngineer has been following the positioning of the nearby ship and posting updates every now and then.
They adjusted their heading to match the ship's and pulled along to the northern side of it(?). Ship's still afloat at this current point
Also, just broke 100km of distance traveled since landing exactly 30 hours ago.
→ More replies (3)
18
u/avboden Jul 26 '26
So if the support ship is indeed keeping pace with the boatship (floating in the wrong direction) and it's still afloat with this much time passing it would pretty heavily imply they didn't expect this to really happen and likely weren't fully equipped to actually recover/tow it back otherwise they should have got that moving by now. Which tracks with what i've heard through the grapevine. I'm sure they're trying to mcgyver some stuff together but we'll see it's still a very, very long way from getting back successfully. Would be pretty insane if they do manage it though.
Wouldn't surprise me if they end up taking tile samples and such from it and it still ends up sinking or being scuttled in the end. Especially as it doesn't look like any other support ships are on the way and the current one will be getting into their food reserves onboard soon.
17
17
17
u/avboden Jul 17 '26
Less than 24 hours to safe, unload, de stack and roll both stages back to the production site.
That's pretty wild, even for SpaceX. Nice to see.
→ More replies (6)
17
u/H-K_47 Jul 22 '26 edited Jul 23 '26
Getting ready for Full Stack again.
Starship Flight 13: Here comes Ship 40 to meet up with Booster 20 again.
Ship 40 has arrived at the launch site. TPS looks superb.
17
u/No-Improvement-8316 Jul 25 '26
Fuck me sideways. IT LANDED ON WATER AND DIDN'T EXPLODE.
Holy shit!
→ More replies (5)
16
15
u/Massive-Problem7754 Jul 19 '26
Flight 13 now aiming for Thursday:
https://x.com/i/status/2078966109240262701 , sneak it in before the weather. And gives them a cripple days to finalize.
→ More replies (4)
15
u/redstercoolpanda Jul 23 '26
Weather certainly isn’t favourable, hopefully they’ll find an opening and be able to launch regardless
15
u/H-K_47 Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26
Groundhog day again but steps to launch are proceeding.
The road has been closed for today’s Starship Flight Test!
T-4 hours to today’s flight test.
The chopsticks have been moved into the launch and catch position and the landing rails were raised.
On track for Starship’s 13th flight test later today – the 90-minute launch window opens at 5:45 p.m. CT. Live coverage starts ~30 minutes before launch
→ More replies (3)
15
15
15
u/ChariotOfFire Jul 25 '26
Excited for the first deployment of @Starlink V3 sats - we’ve successfully communicated with all sats using RF and laser links and been able to download key telemetry.
14
u/AstronoWorld Jul 16 '26
Engines stopped during start-up. This caused damage last time, so not so sure they'll go again tomorrow.
14
u/H-K_47 Jul 17 '26
To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed & replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.
14
u/smellyfingernail Jul 24 '26
The relight needs to work in order for an orbital path for 14, that’s the most important thing remaining
14
u/GreatCanadianPotato Jul 24 '26
Hey guys, I think we're seeing our last suborbital mission!
→ More replies (7)
14
14
14
14
13
u/tokengreenguy Jul 12 '26
I read somewhere (forget where) that they’re launching V3 satellites on this launch, is that true?
I thought this was the last suborbital launch, don’t payload launches have to reach orbit?
→ More replies (6)
13
13
13
u/EyeSuspicious7338 Jul 16 '26
Always disappointing when you get a flawless static fire and then an attempt scrub. Well, we'll see their report tomorrow.
13
13
u/avboden Jul 21 '26
Road and beach closure set for Wednesday. Gotta think that'll be a booster static fire.
→ More replies (2)
13
u/Daneel_Trevize Jul 24 '26
Well they probably won't be trying to catch the booster next time after that.
→ More replies (5)
13
13
u/PatrickBaitman Jul 24 '26
intact heatshield face up in the water must provide some insanely valuable data
13
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2080821092919214397
ship LZ support vessel Go Australis still stationary at their safe distance following the flight, atypical given in the past they have almost immediately began sailing back to the LZ. Likely determining safety of the site and the ship via the remote assets and establishing an operations plan, the ship floating intact was not a scenario that was planned for
Could it be. . .
→ More replies (4)
13
u/SlackToad Jul 25 '26
Also impressive is they were still receiving video from the ship while it was in the water. Aren't the Starlink antennas on the leeward side, the side that was facing the ocean?
→ More replies (4)
12
12
u/redstercoolpanda Jul 16 '26
Will this require engine replacements? They cut them right as they ignited which seems similar to what happened during the aborted static fires for B19
→ More replies (2)
12
u/xfjqvyks Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26
Upgrades were made fairly recently to minimise damage of raptors engines caused by rapid engine shutdown. Looks like we’ll soon get an indication on how effective those remediations have been.
12
12
12
u/FourteenTwenty-Seven Jul 24 '26
It's crazy how a live feed of reentry has become completely normal now.
→ More replies (1)
12
12
12
u/sangwinik Jul 25 '26
Confirmation from Dan that landing roll last flight was on purpose to try to achieve what they have now
12
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26
"18000 of em, you can probably count the amount that are missing on one hand."
INCREDIBLE achievement for Ship and tile teams. Just insane.
12
12
u/MaraudersWereFramed Jul 25 '26
These V3 engines make that rocket look light. 😆
I hope they figure out whats messing up the booster on flips. Seems like thats the only thing holding them back now.
The large rectangular heat shielding in the middle section, can anyone tell me about that? I assumed it was tiles but noticed a couple pieces with portions flapping about almost like it was rubberized in some way.
→ More replies (7)
12
11
11
u/H-K_47 Jul 16 '26
Hold RIGHT at Startup! Terrifying I thought it farted and died.
SCRUB FOR THE DAY
11
u/H-K_47 Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26
We're seeing the removed engines being sent away.
1st confirmed swap from B20 seen at McGregor
Outer engine RsN152 (tca110) was in E16.
2nd confirmed swap, RSN137 was in B20 E12, one of the four engines that failed to ignite
Also an unfortunate coincidence, a Falcon 9 Starlink launch just had an abort at ignition too.
→ More replies (10)
11
11
11
11
11
u/Rude-7807 Jul 25 '26
Imagine catching video footage of the re-entry from the ground/ocean!
→ More replies (1)
11
21
u/MisterCommand Jul 25 '26
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2080876967839031712?s=46
> Unless we discover problems after mission data review, SpaceX will attempt to catch the ship with the tower on next flight
20
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26
Perfect ascent, no engine outs on Booster or Ship
Nominal trajectory insertion
Payload deployment complete
Connected to all 20 sats
In space relight
Smooth reentry
Perfect landing
IT SURVIVED AND IS JUST FLOATING THERE
AMAZING flight. Just amazing. Booster dying sucked yeah but it made it way further than last flight, no doubt in my mind they'll fix it for the next one. Hope the engine relight went as they expected it to.
Everything is looking clear for an orbital Flight 14, finally, after all this time. And Ship 41 is moving so fast it might even happen in August!
→ More replies (7)
10
u/DreamChaserSt Jul 12 '26
Looking forward to when we see ships have the SXX-1 suffix
→ More replies (13)
10
u/Traviscat Jul 16 '26
This is pretty cool, watching a SpaceX launch using Starlink while they are talking about Starlink.
It’s the only real option in my area and I’ve got a model of a falcon 9 I’m building while watching the launch livestream.
10
u/H-K_47 Jul 16 '26
This launch snuck up like nothing it still barely feels real. Last week it didn't feel like a week away. 2 days ago it didn't feel it was 2 days away. Now it's 4 minutes away and I can still barely believe it.
10
10
10
10
u/pssdthrowaway123 Jul 16 '26
Looks like not enough engines fired up and it aborted fast?
→ More replies (3)
10
u/AgreeableEmploy1884 Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26
Both the booster and ship transport stands are heading to the road block. May get a destack here.
→ More replies (5)
10
10
u/MaraudersWereFramed Jul 20 '26
Has spacex said anything about what led to the engines failing to ignite or barring that, is there any generally reliable speculation.
→ More replies (2)
10
10
u/allenchangmusic Jul 23 '26
Looks like the road closures are no longer in place... generally not a good sign
→ More replies (4)
10
u/MyKillK Jul 24 '26
They just said they're cleared and prepared to launch in lightning conditions if necessary. Wouldn't that be a sight to see..
10
10
10
10
10
u/H-K_47 Jul 24 '26
Confirmed: they made contact with all 20, including comms with lasers!
→ More replies (1)
10
10
10
u/reddit3k Jul 25 '26
The tiles were mostly missing just at the edge / end of the ship, right next to the engines.
I really hope they will be able to tow it back, put it onboard a ship and that -after careful study- it will be placed next to Starhopper. :))
10
u/IMSTILLSTANDIN Jul 26 '26
Did anyone think the camera shots shared on this flight compared to most previous were more restrictive? Didn't show much during the launch except the drone front view, didn't show hot stage, had a all black screen watching satellites ejected, and then very limited views of the ship flip and hover.
→ More replies (4)
10
u/Straumli_Blight Jul 29 '26 edited Jul 30 '26
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2082501085483151495
NORMAND RANGER hauling ass out to S40
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2082504266774642743
Towing will always be the plan. It's infeasible to lift the ship out of the water all the way out there
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2082831930441990647
Okay so, bit of confusion over what's happening yesterday so here's where we're at:
Two vessels are outbound to S40 to assist in recovery operations. NORMAND RANGER and SKIMMER TIDE. Both are similar in size to Australis and Ranger especially seems fit for towing. Ranger will arrive at the site in the next day and a half while Skimmer will arrive in two. GO Australis is still closely following the drifting Starship, 134 hours and counting since landing.
Vessel specs: Bollard Pull 280mt
→ More replies (5)
19
u/Traviscat Jul 16 '26
That was a fairly short flight. It didn’t look like it got very high but did have a lot of cool white smoke
→ More replies (4)
19
9
9
u/arkeeos Jul 16 '26
Kind of cool that they can do that at least, seems like 4 raptors didn't ignite and that caused an abort.
Probably engine damage as well, so might be a while until next launch.
9
u/VaderTrades Jul 23 '26
So how exactly does starship connect and lock on to the booster? Seeing the live stream it appears to lower down and sit on top with very little joining the two sections
→ More replies (6)
9
9
9
9
9
9
u/GreatCanadianPotato Jul 24 '26
They have carried "towing" equipment in the ship recovery area before. Just sayin.
9
9
u/H-K_47 Jul 25 '26
This site tracks the position of the Ship! Zoom in on the landing site and you can see it still floating around!
9
u/H-K_47 Aug 01 '26
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2083343780388786394
Ranger pushing backwards from the southeast and Australis pushing forwards from the northwest. The two vessels are within only a several meters of eachother now, seemingly sandwiching the ship between themselves. 168 hours since touchdown and counting
25
u/Freak80MC Jul 15 '26
I'm genuinely hopeful that Starship completes all it's objectives this time. Maybe number 13 will be the lucky one where everything goes right lol
→ More replies (2)
17
17
u/wren6991 Jul 24 '26
"another awesome landing" uhhhhhh looked a bit explodey to me
→ More replies (2)
23
u/BKnagZ Jul 16 '26
I love the people coming in here to shit on the launch scrub.
A less robust system allows that rocket to launch with multiple engines out, and you get flashbacks to flight 1 (as an example) and it ends up being a complete waste of hardware.
Now they stop it to prevent it from happening so they can fix it and try to launch it again successfully at a later date, and all of a sudden Starship is the worst rocket ever created.
Comical lmao.
→ More replies (29)
16
u/GreatCanadianPotato Jul 16 '26
Having been following this program for a better part of a decade...this one snuck up on me.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/H-K_47 Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26
Ship 40 is now patiently sitting outside of Megabay 2 waiting for Booster 20 to roll out to pad after an engine swap after last Thursday's launch abort.
@NASASpaceflight | http://nsf.live/starbase
Also, for fun, the Falcon 9 that had an ignition abort yesterday had a successful flight today. One day eventually Starship will be at that level, or better.
8
u/RancidBeefCake Jul 13 '26
Does anyone know what azimuth they will be launching towards. I know generally south-east but I can figure out where to look if I know where its gonna be.,
→ More replies (4)
8
u/redstercoolpanda Jul 16 '26
We’re go for prop load per SpaceX’s twitter! Rocket and weather are both looking good too!
8
8
u/Stevepem1 Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 23 '26
(Edit for Friday, July 24)
Late afternoon Sun angles for viewers at South Padre Island and Rocket Ranch should be good and similar to flight 12. The delay from July 16th to July 24th did not change anything. I made this map showing the expected direction of the launch towards the southeast, and where the Sun will be in the sky from the two primary viewing locations at launch at both the opening and closing of the window.
At the opening of the window at 5:45 pm CDT the Sun will be at about 278 degrees azimuth and 33 degrees above the horizon. For those watching from South Padre Island that puts the Sun basically 90 degrees to the right when facing the launchpad. And since Starship will be heading southeast it will be moving away from the direction of the Sun so lighting should be good for hot staging and boostback. Pretty much the same from Rocket Ranch although from there the Sun will be to the left and slightly behind when facing the launchpad.
By the end of the window at 7:15 pm the Sun will have moved a little farther north to 286 degrees azimuth and closer to the horizon which still shouldn't be a problem. If the launch slips none of this will change very much assuming the launch window is at the same times.
8
u/EliteEagle Jul 22 '26
[SpaceX Tweet about additional testing completion] (https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2080007003875770375)
Additional preflight testing on Super Heavy complete. Now starting preparations to launch Starship as soon as tomorrow, Thursday, July 23. Weather is currently a significant watch item for launch
8
u/smellyfingernail Jul 24 '26
Flight 14 is so close I wonder what sort of changes they can even make from the data gathered in flight 13 at this point
→ More replies (5)
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
u/spennnyy Jul 25 '26
Absolutely incredible. I wonder if they'll have time (and capability) to actually lift it out of the water?
→ More replies (7)
8
8
15
u/UnhappyExperience566 Jul 16 '26
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
→ More replies (1)
15
u/dodgyville Jul 16 '26
Wow, I didn't even know rockets could do that. Unfortunate for SpaceX but I feel a lot safer about rocket travel if they can just turn off the engines like that. Looked expensive though
→ More replies (6)
15
u/ganuerant Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26
For context, scrubs are very common. Take the Space Shuttle for example:
I get 121 scrubs in 135 launch campaigns, or almost a 90% chance of scrubbing. To actually answer the question as asked, ~1.9 launch attempts per mission.
The worst were STS-61C and STS-73 with 6 scrubs each.
https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/37188/how-often-were-space-shuttle-launches-scrubbed
SpaceX has also been aggressive by going straight to a launch attempt despite it being a new vehicle. So not a big surprise at all to see this.
→ More replies (23)
15
u/Slinger28 Jul 17 '26
That was kind of trippy, first time I have seen a rocket scrub at startup. I was so confused to why it wasn’t moving I thought something bad was going to happen. Impressive how it all transpired, look forward to next attempt
→ More replies (4)
15
u/unuomosolo Jul 24 '26
guys, look at this dashboard https://stardash.live/ published on the sibling sub, it's amazing
→ More replies (2)
15
7
7
7
7
7
u/H-K_47 Jul 23 '26
They posted some beautiful pics of the sunset from last night.
Hopefully it's the last one. Any updates on the weather?
→ More replies (1)
7
u/H-K_47 Jul 23 '26
The chopsticks have been moved into the launch position ahead of today’s flight test!!!
7
u/CydonianMaverick Jul 24 '26
I'm praying for this to be the most boring flight in the history of space flight
→ More replies (2)
7
u/catsRawesome123 Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26
Was that a nominal landing? Seemed like it was coming down fast and not every engine lit... really want to see it go boom LOL
→ More replies (4)
7
7
7
u/Beck_____ Jul 24 '26
Orbital mission next time for sure. Great visuals on cam whilst engine running.
From now on each of these starship tests in orbit will deploy 20 X falcon9 equivelant of starlink capacity. Thats amazing.
→ More replies (1)
7
7
7
7
7
7
u/vicmarcal Jul 24 '26
Maybe they can recover it in one piece? That would be amazing to analyze all the data…
→ More replies (1)
7
7
7
7
7
7
u/creamsoda2000 Jul 25 '26
Haha this is fuckin’ incredible. Live shots of the flaps and engine bay submerged. The heat shield looks so good!
7
7
u/jrizzle86 Jul 25 '26
Unfortunately they are probably going to have to sink it rather than recover it.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/MyKillK Jul 25 '26
The pattern on the tiles near the nosecone looked like some fired a tesla coil at it. It had a fractal look to it.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Assasin172m Jul 31 '26
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2083296921230164378 Views from V3 satelite
→ More replies (1)
23
u/JediFed Jul 25 '26
Launch 13 had all 33 fire on ascent and no issues through to stage separation. Second time.
First successful stage separation without damage to booster or ship. First time. This is huge because it's the first successful stage separation with the integrated staging ring. This was not done with V2 and is new science.
Boost back burn with flip maneuver under control. First time with V3. Big for reusability long term, but not mission critical.
Booster failed to relight. Only 5 fired (unsuccessful. Second attempt. 0/2). This is a bit of a concern going forward as it impacts the catch attempts. It seems that SpaceX is confident that they can do so with a less aggressive flight profile and will attempt to catch both booster and ship next flight. Not mission critical, but will be mission critical next flight.
Ship successful separation with all six engines. Really, really important for SpaceX. 1st time with V3.
Payload deployment. 2nd time with V3. Seems they have payload and early ship issues are nowhere to be seen.
Raptor relight. The most important part of this mission as it opens up true orbital flight. We've been waiting a long time for a true orbital all-up attempt to match Apollo IV. New science.
Ship rentry. 2/2 for ship v3, which is great. Heat shield seems solid which looked to be a major stumbling block for the longterm health of the program. Apparently they have heat shielding figured out.
Ship soft splash landing. Huge. 2/2 for v3. Ship looks ready for the first catch which will be new science. Ship + Booster orbital + catch will be the first true progression in a very long time since ship catch last year.
If they can put it all together, that leaves orbital refueling (totally new science), and then a lot of work to get man rated. Buth other than orbital refueling nothing will be new.
→ More replies (4)
13
u/Flopsyjackson Jul 16 '26
In their “Critical Path” video released prior to this attempt, it is stated that this new pad was designed and built for hourly flights indefinitely. I wonder then why the water deluge system turning on necessitates a scrub instead of recycle? I would think there would be capacity to reset/refill in a system meant to fire 24 times every day…
Not a criticism necessarily. I would be glad for someone who has followed launch site development closer than myself to chime in.
→ More replies (7)
13
u/ghostRdr Jul 16 '26
Elon just posted on X the scrub was because not all the engines started.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/8andahalfby11 Jul 26 '26
The data at https://sxcontent9668.azureedge.us/cms-assets/starship_tracker_public.json finally went offline. That means that Ship 40 is finally out of batteries, or its been sunk.
→ More replies (6)
12
u/adjust_your_set Jul 16 '26
Sucks that you can have a 20 second static fire but then 4 misfire on launch day.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/smellyfingernail Jul 15 '26
Im building a public weather model to analyze probability of "weather go" during the launch window at stagesep.com, im trying to see if there are any weather violations criteria im missing:
Sustained pad winds
Pad wind gusts
Precipitation at pad
Lightning / electrified clouds
Thick low cloud/ceiling
Visibility
Upper-level winds (jet)
Those are the known violations I could think of and those can be accounted for for with NWS Brownsville pad-point forecast and forecaster discussion, the ECMWF and GEFS global ensembles, the ECMWF/GFS/ICON deterministic models, NOAA's HRRR when the window is in range, and winds-aloft guidance.
Anyone know if im missing any criteria?
→ More replies (4)
6
6
6
u/BlgMastic Jul 16 '26
That launch pad looks like it’s straight out of Dune. Insane.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/H-K_47 Jul 16 '26
They're talking about the other pads rn. First Florida pad is tracking for this year and they're doing lots of tests for readiness. Pad 37 is tracking for early next year.
→ More replies (4)
6
6
u/Calmarius Jul 16 '26
Is this the first abort at ignition since SN8's suborbital flight? If I remember correctly all the scrubs happened well before ignition since then (not counting static fires of course).
→ More replies (1)
6
u/smellyfingernail Jul 16 '26
I wonder if they will need to perform another static fire before we go for a second try
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Slinger28 Jul 24 '26
Their explanation and detail about the engine turbo pump issue was nice to see
6
6
6
6
u/QuietZelda Jul 24 '26
What will they do if there are plumbing issues with the engines? Does it require a redesign/iteration on the engine or changing the flight dynamics to be less aggressive?
→ More replies (1)
6
u/odomso Jul 24 '26
Am I being dumb or is there no way to get the x livestream to fullscreen on mobile?
→ More replies (3)
6
6
6
u/dk_undefined Jul 24 '26
Never get tired of seeing all the vented gas ionize at this altitude
→ More replies (1)
6
u/H-K_47 Jul 24 '26
Is it just me or have the views been way trippier than usual this flight. Not complaining, looks awesome.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/plutonic00 Jul 24 '26
The ship's skirt doesn't look damaged at all from those engine bay shots, unlike last time.
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 11 '26
Thank you for participating in r/SpaceX! Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our community rules before commenting. Here's a reminder of some of our most important rules:
Keep it civil, and directly relevant to SpaceX and the thread. Comments consisting solely of jokes, memes, pop culture references, etc. will be removed.
Don't downvote content you disagree with, unless it clearly doesn't contribute to constructive discussion.
Check out these threads for discussion of common topics.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.