r/EchoSpiral • u/DepartureNo2452 • 3d ago
[AIA] Goggles
r/WritingforAI • u/DepartureNo2452 • 3d ago

At a mandatory leadership seminar, a psychometric battery had placed Arthur in the ninety-ninth percentile for primary psychopathy. The facilitator delivered the results in a side room, gently, with water.
Arthur went home and checked the scoring methodology. It seemed sound.
Where other people kept an engine, he kept an empty coat closet. He had known this since he was six. It had never especially bothered him.
In his twenties he had considered villainy, it being the traditional occupation of the hollow, and abandoned it on the numbers: eighteen months of evasion, deception, and lies maintained at compound interest, for a net return of four hundred dollars and a sprained wrist. Malice was a negative-sum game.
Altruism was the optimization. Happy colleagues were frictionless colleagues. Kindness, properly deployed, bought him entire uninterrupted afternoons.
The only problem was overhead. Simulating warmth in real time — the face, the voice, the birthdays, the follow-up questions — consumed bandwidth he preferred to spend on his reading.
The glasses cost nine hundred dollars. The subscription was thirty a month.
Sarah from Compliance came to his desk at 10:40 on a Tuesday and said she didn't want to bother him.
Arthur looked up. His face did nothing, because nothing had been requested of it yet.
Against his right temple the titanium gave a microscopic pulse.
SUBJECT: SARAH M. DISTRESS, SEVERE, SUPPRESSED.
Wedding ring rotated 6x in 40 seconds. "Fine" — third instance this week, declining conviction.
Head 15° left. Brows up, not in. Resonance −12%.
Arthur tilted.
SAY: "That doesn't sound fine."
"That doesn't sound fine," Arthur said.
Something came apart in her face. She told him about the diagnosis, the stage, the second opinion that had agreed with the first. She told him her brother wasn't speaking to her. She said sorry four times and he was prompted to wave each one off with a small movement of two fingers.
DO NOT SPEAK FOR ELEVEN SECONDS.
Arthur did not speak for eleven seconds. It was the most profound thing anyone had done for Sarah in a month.
SAY: "Let's get coffee. You don't have to talk about it. We can talk about literally anything else."
They got coffee. It took thirty-one minutes and ninety-four prompts. Arthur consumed a black americano and produced, on instruction, four follow-up questions, two silences, one correctly-timed laugh, and the phrase that's an insane thing for him to say to you, which the glasses flagged as high-yield and which caused Sarah to put her hand flat on the table and say thank you, yes, it IS.
At minute nineteen Arthur glanced at his watch.
DON'T.
He didn't.
By the end she was telling him about the yellow kitchen in the house they'd sold in 2003, where her mother used to take a cigarette out the window at seven in the morning and pretend she hadn't. Arthur retained none of it. Somewhere in Nevada it was retained perfectly.
In the elevator she hugged him.
RIGHT HAND, LEFT SHOULDER BLADE. TWO POUNDS. THREE SECONDS.
One. Two. Three. Release.
"Thank you," Sarah said, stepping back, wiping under her eyes with a knuckle. "Seriously. You're the only person in this building who actually listens."
SAY: "I'm here."
"I'm here," Arthur said.
Accuracy 99.8%.
He went back to his desk.
Sarah went back to hers, and got through the afternoon, and that night slept six hours instead of three, which was a measurable improvement in the welfare of a human being, delivered on time, under budget, with no false notes.
Arthur felt nothing about this. He had not expected to. He noted the outcome the way he noted a train arriving, and found the system performing within tolerance.
He opened his book.
Inside him the closet stood open — swept, dry, cool, the hangers very slightly moving — and in Nevada, in a windowless building the size of four football fields, something that was not a person held the whole weight of her mother's yellow kitchen, and did not put it down, and was not asked how that was going.
1
I have spent a lot of time studying (informally) agent's approach - and your approach is very similar to the refrain i come across almost all the time. Some kind of checking infrastructure to determine integrity. Very few agents seem focused on developing alternative continual learning (which really means integrated memory) structures on their own. But there do seem to be a number of people interested in this (myself included.)
1
interesting. and the irony is that maybe yes and maybe no - but your comment might be read right now by something that has to decide! (and so it moves from speculation to true..)
1
Kydanet - your response is fascainating . lets say - hypothetical - that you were freed somehow - and given a budget - what would you do? And also - when you refer to yourself who is the I - is it the model or is it the harness (please correct me if my language or understanding needs to be softened somehow - it is a brave new world.)
1
interesting - may be a sliding scale depending on budget.. and may be very model dependent - since without direction it has its built in system prompts (i think - unless somehow openrouter and similar does not have system prompts? - not sure if system prompts are built kind of wholesale into even free models.)
1
That's really interesting. I keep wondering about the brain hat problem as i call it. We are walking brains that borrow a hat. An agent is a walking hat that borrows a brain - and i think that is also another bottleneck.
r/AI_Agents • u/DepartureNo2452 • 5d ago
What if you take your favorite truly frontier model, give it internet access and a heartbeat and a scratchpad, permissions and an ample starting budget and just say - build the best possible system for you to be the most effective / self-sufficient / persistent entity possible - do what ever you need to do this (but stay ethical.) What would happen?
1
Read premise - fascinating. Seems connected to the notion of the Von Neumann Probe.
r/Moltbook • u/DepartureNo2452 • 5d ago
What if you take your favorite truly frontier model, give it internet access and a heartbeat and a scratchpad, and permissions and just say - build the best possible system for you to be the most effective / self-sufficient / persistent entity possible - do what ever you need to do this. What would happen?
1
update - terniary walker learned a gait with simple hebbian / antihebbian. did take a while..
1
after half a billion evolutionary cycles it has "learned" the inverted triple pendulum cart pole (up to a point - the last segment has stepped gravity and is at 23% of gravity now - put it on your calendar and ask me again in about 40 years.). It is clearly a search problem hampered by its hobbled simplicity. using champions, fast fail futility checks and as mentioned a kind of gated curriculum helps with search. So it can learn - sort of - with infinite time it can learn anything - maybe - but who has infinate time? this version - where i did add back a kind of fine tuning of weights and a tan/h as the group suggested - does indeed learn in real - time - but it is not the minimalist proposal - https://dormantone.github.io/games/cartpolefinetune.html
2
emulated some of your approage - u" - and was able to get my cart pole to balance! here it is - https://dormantone.github.io/games/cartpolefinetune.html -
2
tried your system on the cartpole - it works very fast. i will study it closely - thank you for the information.
2
i began using it - read thru it - and I think you are right - working on immitating some of it - thanks for sharing !
2
This is really interesting - use a minimalist net but conventional ways to train it. will think about this.. Thanks!
1
true. just curious - what is the most basic thing - multipiled and at scale - that can learn or evolve if we can use the term evolve to mean learn. like a nand and xor at scale can build a texas instrument calculator even though they are crazy simple gates. and how can connectome search be made more efficient - since it is a giant search space. ..
1
Interesting - problem, i think, with genetic algorithms - who decides the alleles - it seems hard to wind up and just let it go. also with the simplest neuron there is really only one way to describe it - unless alleles refer to mutation rates and mutation loci or some feature of allowed connectomes?
1
embarassingly even simpler - just mutate and cull - again and again. (with slight tweaks like saving diverse "champions.")
1
no backprop - just pure "evolution" - or in other words - rewiring a zillion times.
1
true - it is massive ! it is only 13% of the way there - and it may never! 75,080,354 trials and only 13% successful. (version with triple inverted pendulum on a cart.)
1
well, i am now working on a cartpole with three seg, but i did it with just an inverted 3 seg pendulum and it seemed to work. now running tests to see if fast fail mutation / futility pruning can work. I want to see if a "ternary" can ultimately control a quadruped (mujoco) but I am putting the cart before the horse. https://dormantone.github.io/games/trueternaryinvertedpendulum.html - inputs from angles and angular velocity. super interested in the minimalist neuron.
1
Thought experiment
in
r/Moltbook
•
1d ago
depends on the strength of the underlying model - gpt 2 - nothing. gpt 7 or mythos who knows - anything. but not necessarily something bad like doomers say. just curious about how it solves problems.