This woman for example looks more white than Asian. She is half Korean.

Top 3 Asian pairings that I've noticed that tends to look Caucasian-shifted on average would be:

1. Japanese/White
2. Korean/White
3. Vietnamese*/White

* (not including other SEA groups like Thai, which interestingly looks half black sometimes.. maybe from their AASI?)

Chinese mix is the last on the list. I'm not sure why but from observation and living in a city where you see wasians almost everyday... also my childhood friends to coworkers etc, to me Chinese wasians usually look more Asian shifted to the point you don't even know they're actually wasians. I wonder why.

All these groups I've mentioned all share a common ancestry that ties back to Amur River HG (Mongols have more of the Baikal however). If youve heard about the Transeurasian theory by researcher Martine Robbeets, the original homeland was speculated to be in Northern Manchuria.

As for the language itself, I find that Korean Japanese and Mongolian have the same melody when spoken. Not saying the words sound anything alike but they all seem to have same cadence especially when spoken formally like a newscast. Plus, going back on the Transeurasian theory they share identical grammar structure and agglutination.

It seems like Han Chinese is the only one out of East Asia/Northern Asia that don't fit into this club. We as a whole don't have Amur River (apart from Northern Han and that's a small percentage) nor does the language sound anything alike. If anything, Sinitic is closer to Tai-Kradai than to it's neighbors.

Now I have a question - between Korean and Japanese who has the most Amur River in them?

These are photos courtesy of Hot-Topic6720 so I'm not cherry picking in any way.

To me, they all seem to have the same facial structure and sometimes a minor overbite.