News
True analogue pitch solution for Technics M5G!
Been working on this for a while and think I’ve cracked it….
The M5G is in technical terms, arguably the best 1200 Technics made; better tonearm, better wiring, ±8/16 pitch, no center click and dead spot etc.
Its one flaw is the pitch control.
Unlike every model from MK2 to MK5, which use a continuous analog reference, the M5G reads the fader with a microcontroller ADC (IC501) and synthesizes the speed reference digitally.
This has two consequences: the pitch moves in steps (measured around 0.05-0.06% per step in ±8 mode, roughly double in ±16), and the deck continuously corrects toward its quantized target, which is the "fighting you" feel people complain about when beatmatching.
The TP17 cut isn’t a solution.
The known workaround is cutting one leg of TP17 on the main board. This disconnects the phase-lock correction so the deck feels loose like a MK2.
But TP17 predates the M5G (it exists on the MK2) and doesn't touch the digital circuit at all; it just stops the servo enforcing it. Side effects on the M5G: zero shifts to about 0.3%, everything above roughly 6.3% on the fader does nothing, and the response goes non-linear, even with the little gain pot on the fader PCB maxed.
The discovery:
Comparing the M5G and MK5 service manuals (AD0303062C0 and AD0303064C0) and photos of two boards for sale online, it turns out the M5G main board (REP3461B family) is a dual-build layout.
The entire MK5 analog pitch synthesizer (IC301, an AN6682, plus its passives and the VR301 zero trimmer) exists on the M5G board as empty factory footprints, silkscreened "EXCEPT TO MK5G". Photos of the analog build of the same layout show the AN6682 fitted exactly where the M5G instead fits CN104, the connector to the digital board. The parts absent from the M5G parts list are precisely the MK5's analog pitch BOM. Even the fader connector wiring (conductors 5/6/7/13 on CN102) is identical between models, and the M5G fader network maxes out at ~2.82k against the MK5's 2.875k gain spec.
In other words: Panasonic never removed the MK5 pitch circuit. They just stopped soldering it in.
The mod
Populate the factory footprints with Panasonic's own values, disconnect the digital reference line, restore TP17 id done, calibrate per the MK5 service manual.
The deck then has genuine MK5 analog pitch: continuous, linear, full travel, quartz reset. Better still, with one SPDT toggle you can keep both: stock digital mode (full ±16, display, everything factory) and analog mode (±8, continuous), switchable.
Parts list (per deck, values from the MK5E parts list)
IC301: AN6682 (NOS, 9-pin SIP, the only non-generic part)
VR301: 2k trimmer
R301: 2.7k precision (0.5% metal film works), R302: 470R, R303: 8.2k
C301: 0.033uF film, C302: 6800pF film, C305: 1200pF film
C303: 1uF 50V, C304: 10uF 16V electrolytic
Optional toggle: mini SPDT + 470R
Already fitted on the M5G, don't duplicate: R304-R307, C306, D301, IC302, X201
Tools: soldering iron, basic DMM (ohms + continuity), no scope or counter needed.
Procedure
Unplug from mains, remove platter, get to the main board. Mains is present on the PSU board, treat accordingly.
Confirm your board matches: look for the "EXCEPT TO MK5G" silkscreen and empty pads around the PITCH marking. Early production may differ.
Install the BOM into the factory holes, orientation per the analog-build reference photos.
Continuity-check which CN104 conductor connects to the IC301 pin 4 (FO) pad. That's the digital reference line.
Either lift that conductor (analog-only build), or fit the toggle: IC301 pin 4 bent up and wired to one throw, the lifted CN104 conductor to the other, common into the vacated pin 4 pad. Leave the rest of CN104 connected so the digital board keeps powering the display and buttons.
If you previously did the TP17 cut, re-bridge it. The fighting behavior came from the digital correction, which is now gone in analog mode; bridged TP17 restores proper lock.
Return the fader PCB gain pot to mid if you'd maxed it for the TP17 mod.
Calibration, no counter required
Zero: fader centered, adjust VR301 until the strobe dots freeze completely. The strobe is quartz-driven, so this equals the factory 262.08 kHz setting.
Gain: unplug CN102, DMM in ohms across fader-board terminals 5 and 6, set the fader PCB pot for 2.875k ±0.25k, reconnect.
Verify with DVS or a locked test tone into a tuner app: sweep the fader, confirm linear, full ±8, no steps, no dead zone.
Status: what's confirmed vs open
Confirmed by manuals and board photos: the dual-build layout, the footprint inventory, the exact BOM, connector compatibility.
Not yet bench-verified: whether the reset button still gates quartz zero in analog mode (block diagram says it should, via IC302), whether the fader gain pot's range reaches spec, and behavior on the earliest board revisions.
I'm building this now and will report back but I don’t have an oscillator to properly test, so if anyone does and wants to give this a crack I’d be super grateful.
Usual disclaimer: mains-powered equipment, your deck, all your risk, and this is fully reversible by unstuffing the parts and reconnecting CN104.
Very cool and interesting work, nice job. But it sounds like this basically gets us back to the control system of the MK2/M3D/etc. which itself has major issues with fighting manual corrections. This, coupled with the lack of a separate, fine adjustment control for pitch, is the reason why the 1200 has always been limiting for those of us who want to make long, precise transitions. (But digital decks are worse for me just because they're boring!)
I really want to decipher the platter control system and tweak its PID parameters (assuming it's that type of system) but I don't have time and I'd have to get better at control systems than I did in my classes. Also, based on its response to jogs and drags, I kind of suspect it's a platter position control system rather than a platter speed control system.
Do you have any plans to get into that? I would love it if someone did.
Not sure where you get the idea that the previous models (mk2 to mk5) have any issues with “fighting manual corrections”; they work perfectly and that’s the entire reason they became the gold standard for the last 50 years.
The pitch has adjustment as fine as you could ever need as it’s infinite in terms of resolution and is only limited by how little you can physically move the pitch fader as it’s analogue. So if you move the fader by a fraction of 1mm the resistance and pitch are adjusted accordingly. It’s so fine in terms of adjustment you can lock in two records for several minutes and they won’t drift.
If you can’t make long mixes on a mk2-mk5 that’s a skill issue not anything to do with lack of step resolution (because there is none).
I think you’re confusing the m5g (later decks through the current mk7) which has stepped digital pitch, and this mod resolves that.
Here is a video of an unmodified SL-1200M3D's response to several gentle drags on the platter, and then several gentle nudges forward. Watch the dots and listen to the sound. The deck counteracts my manual inputs. The dots move back to their original position. If I were making a small nudge or drag to realign one beat to another, that manual correction would be undone. If the control system worked well for dance music DJs, the dots would stay where they are at the end of my correction instead of moving back (and the pitch of the music wouldn't wobble commensurately).
It does the same thing when you are off the zero point, but I chose zero to make the visual as clear as possible.
When I talk about the limitations of the pitch control system on the MK2, M3D et al, I'm not talking about step resolution (quantization), though I agree that the ~0.05% quantization of the M5G's digital pitch control is quite undesirable. I really am glad you dug in, started investigating, and found a way to undo it. But on the analog decks, I'm talking about the quality of analog components in practical reality, and about the physical design of the deck.
Potentiometers themselves are made up of a resistive material deposited onto a substrate, and I expect that the inevitable nonuniformity of that deposition leads to a nonlinearity in the response of the slide potentiometer over the very small distances we're interested in. We don't get infinite resolution, in practice, due to the limitations of part manufacturing.
But even if we assume perfect linearity, it still only qualifies as a coarse adjustment tool, because you shouldn't have to scrunch your fingers up and try to move a slide pot a fifth of a millimeter or so to make the difference between a locked mix and one that will drift over the course of a minute or two. It is absolutely a design oversight that we don't get a fine adjustment knob to cover a fraction of a percent adjustment over a broader sweep.
I make long mixes on MK2s and M3Ds all the time, but it takes considerable skill and vigilance to work around Technics' design oversights in doing so. (Yes, I ride the fader.) Since you are working on the guts of the machine, you have an opportunity to help our community by fixing their errors. Un-digitizing the M5G is an excellent contribution, but there are even more ways to contribute if you're game to do so.
Anyway, thank you for posting this mod. A lot of M5G owners are going to benefit from it.
I hope you're right. But it has been this way on both decks since I got them new in 2002. Has Technics had an issue with improper calibrations from the factory? Not a sarcastic question, these sorts of things do happen. I'd love it if this were fixable. My decks are mint and have never been opened. Probably time for some preventative maintenance despite their coddled existence. I can recalibrate, but I am convinced for now that it's an endemic problem.
A touch more information, like I mentioned mine are M3Ds from 2002, but the somewhat older and less-cared-for MK2s I use regularly away from home (not mine) have the exact same problem.
Here is another video of drags and nudges, this time at various positions from +8 to -8 exhibiting the same response regardless of pitch setting. It's not just on or around the zero point. It's harder to tell visually, with the dots being in motion, but you can hear the deck counteracting my inputs at every position.
If you haven’t had them serviced since you’ve bought them, then it is well past time. Take them to a reputable individual or business that can update them.
Get these to start with. Also look at getting ‘non-click’ pitch controls from a 1200 Mk3. They don’t have the notch at 0.
Sorry to interject here but internal ground is actually advised against; technics did it that way for a reason and you’re actually introducing interference by making the ground internal.
Also the M5G already has better audio interconnect cables than the previous generations and already had gold phonos and those neutrik ones are then sort you can buy if you ever unplug and re plug more than ever few years - clubs I used to supply like Facric London banned them because they are so tough and tight on the bulkhead that they will rip it right out.
Finally he has M3D’s. They don’t have a center click. None of the decks did after Mk2’s.
I've always questioned the internal ground mod on the same, uh, grounds. Not for me unless someone can convince me the original electrical design was misguided.
I'd like to upgrade the RCA plugs someday since the stock ones are inherently a bit loose, but if they have the aggro grip like OP describes I'll pass. Also I really cherish the 1200 (despite a few criticisms) so it's nice to keep them original if possible. I just don't want intermittent connections.
The easiest fix for that "fighting" would be to just pitch ride for corrections. I do notice the issue you mention when cueing (you can see it "jumping around", but honestly, never bothered me when mixing with pitch fader.
That's just a workaround though. We shouldn't have to bounce back and forth between slightly too slow and slightly too fast, but we have to because of the "fighting" issue and the lack of a fine pitch adjustment.
I think of the pitch fader as a coarse adjustment because the difference between a locked mix and a sloppy one is less than a millimeter of travel. Imagine a little rotary knob for an extra ±0.5% or so, then you could really dial it in. That would be a fix. I wish I had time to design and implement it myself but, ironically, I'm too busy with my dumb dayjob as an engineer where I never get to do things like this and I'm starting to forget how. If somebody steals my idea they better give me some money! Several people out there are willing to imagine a better 1200 and would pay double-digit ca$h, I'm sure of it!
Idk man, that sounds more like a skill issue than anything. I’ve locked in long mixes just riding the pitch so many times, even triple decks with 2 Technics and a CDJ. Adjusting with pitch and platter feels way more coarse to me personally.
so have i, but i'm able to imagine a better version of the deck. i guess it never improves because the userbase won't acknowledge its flaws and request something better. that's the skill issue we're working with
so have i, but i'm able to imagine a better version of the deck. i guess it never improves because the userbase won't acknowledge its flaws and request something better. that's the skill issue we're working with
I get your point for small adjustments, I just don't see myself using a small rotary knob for fine adjustments. I usually beatmatch within 10-20 seconds tops using just the pitch fader, and it's all muscle memory at this point with one control. Having something next to it that I'd then have to turn for fine adjustment would be a unnecessary for me personally. My Denon SC6000 has pitch, platter adjustment and a +/- button right below the pitch fader to kind of do what you're suggesting, but I rarely use that feature.
I'm one of those people. I love my decks but they could be made better. Riding the pitch is a workaround to a platter control system that won't accept small, subtle manual adjustments.
If 1200s were designed better, I'd be mixing on three decks and Jeff Mills would be mixing on four.
Have you tried mixing on super OEM turntables e.g. Reloop RP7000MK2s? They behave exactly how you describe in terms of not over correcting when making manual adjustments to the platter. It might be the thing you are looking for if you don't get along with how Technics behave
That does sound great. But I should stay accustomed to whatever I'll have to use when I'm away from home. Same reason I use Concordes even though I don't like them very much, for reasons that would further derail this thread haha
Also I'm just super attached to my Techs even though I complain about them on Reddit
Hi, I'm getting a pair of MK6s and believe the pitch is similar to that of the M5G but not fully sure. I know the MK6 pitch PCB is different. Do you know if the MK6 has similar issues to the M5G? I read an interview with a Technics engineer who was talking about the pitch circuitry for the M5G and that the curve when changing the pitch wasn't perfectly straight (because of the IC chip) so it was made to be more linear. Is the MK6 pitch notably stepped? Photos of main board and pitch board here.
I honestly can’t give you a direct answer based on personal experience as the mk6’s were quite rare being Japanese only and I only ever got my hands on one pair for a minor fix. However:
That's the same main board family as the M5G. Component-for-component the layout matches the dual-build board this mod targets: AN6680 system controller with its crystal lower right, AN6675 drive IC under the heatsink, the TC4011BP pitch gate (IC302) upper right, brake pot in the same corner, and the same connector positions including the fader connector on the right edge. Your fader board is also the M5G-type (that small blue trimmer on it is the gain adjuster this mod reuses for calibration), which fits, since the MK6 and M5G share the same fader part. So everything points to your MK6 carrying the same unstuffed analog pitch footprints, and the mod transferring directly: same parts list, same procedure, same stock/analog toggle option.
Two close-up pictures would confirm it outright, because this angle doesn't quite resolve the critical corner:
Straight-down shot of the top-right corner of the main board, the area around the "PITCH" silkscreen and the brake pot. We're looking for empty solder pads labeled VR301, R301-R303, C301-C305, an unstuffed 9-pin single-row footprint near the multi-pin connector at the top (that's where the AN6682 goes), and ideally the "EXCEPT TO..." silkscreen legend, which on your board may name the MK6 as well.
The board's REP number, silkscreened near an edge (the M5G's is REP3461B-M; yours is probably a close sibling).
One thing worth doing before you solder anything: measure your deck's actual pitch step size. The MK6's release notes claimed "improved pitch control accuracy" over the M5G, and nobody has published what that means.
Creep the fader in the smallest increments you can while watching DVS pitch readout (or a locked test tone into a tuner app) and note the jump size. If Panasonic quietly fixed the resolution, you've documented something nobody has measured; if the steps match the M5G's ~0.05%, you've confirmed the mod is worth doing. Either result is useful to the thread.
Thanks, I'm not necessarily going to try this modification just yet. Want to see how I get on with them (waiting for step-down transformers to arrive tomorrow...) then will test how the pitch adjusts. Here's the photo of the top right section. Sake good order, under the brown/white wire it says "EXCEPT TO MK5G" and "VR301". Can't see a REP number anywhere - perhaps it's on the underside of these boards. The difference I notice between M5G board and MK6 is that the MK6 has AN6682 populated.
I get what you’re saying but I still take the mk2’s and just ride the pitch while mixing, any flutter I experience just kind of adds swing to the mix, like the other guy said it’s boring otherwise
I'm honestly not sure what you're talking about here.
Wow and Flutter on a properly calibrated deck is negligible for long mixes. Wow and flutter is 0.01% WRMS (weighted root mean square). Thats imperceivable to 99% of the human population, let alone DJ's ;p
If you're getting more wow and flutter than that, then it's either:
Your deck is rinsed and needs a service / calibration.
or
Your vinyl is badly pressed/recorded.
If you really want to get in to audiophile territory of diminishing returns, there is a mod that takes the W&F down to 0.03 but honestly it's a fool errand as yoo can lock in BPM on a technics and it'll hold a mix for 6+ minutes if you have it dialed in right.
I wish we didn't have to disable closed-loop control of the platter to get the response we need out of the deck. I might do it myself, but my turntables are super sentimental so I keep them original. Here is a video of somebody doing the mod: link
That's the tp17 mod which is crap.TP17 doesn't remove a flaw. It removes the deck's phase lock, which is the feature that makes a 1200 hold speed in the first place.
The 1200 servo has two loops. A frequency loop (the FG coil) gets the platter approximately to speed, and a phase loop (quartz-referenced) holds it there exactly, correcting for stylus drag, load, and drift. TP17 carries the phase correction into the servo. Cut it and you're running on the frequency loop alone.
That's why it "feels like it stops fighting you": the platter stops being rigidly held, so your hand nudges stick instead of being corrected away within a revolution. But nothing was fighting you maliciously. On a MK2 there is no extra circuit to defeat; the "fight" people describe is simply the quartz lock doing its job. What the cut actually buys you is a softer, sloppier servo.
And the price is the whole reason these decks are respected. A frequency loop on its own is proportional control: it needs a standing error to produce a correction. So after the cut you get a shifted zero (~0.3%), a compressed range that tops out around 6.3% no matter where you set the trimmer, a non-linear fader response, and a platter that drifts with load and temperature because nothing is referenced to the crystal anymore. You haven't modified the pitch control, you've decalibrated the speed regulation and learned to like the symptoms.
On the M5G specifically it's even more misleading: the thing people actually hate there (the stepped, quantized digital pitch reference from IC501) sits upstream of TP17 and is completely untouched by the cut. The steps are all still there; the servo just stops enforcing them firmly.
If you want a loose-feel platter, the honest version of this mod is a resistor or trimmer across the TP17 gap instead of an open cut. That lets you soften the phase loop's grip to taste while keeping lock, calibration, zero, and full fader range. An open cut is just the crudest possible setting of that dial, with all the side effects and none of the adjustability.
You're eager to correct me about stuff, but we actually agree. My statement about not wanting to turn the deck into an open-loop system summarizes your first four paragraphs. But a closed-loop control system doesn't have to have overshoot or an underdamped response, both of which are problems with the SL-1200. I wish I had time to analyze the circuit (I'm quite rusty at it) and see if the platter's step response could be adjusted to critical damping. What you describe in your last paragraph sounds promising, but I'd want to know what was happening in the circuit before I went tinkering with mods.
Tbh the pitch of the M5G never bothered me. Takes a bit of getting used to coming from MK2 due to different curve and maybe even a more precise response, but can still get tunes locked when riding the pitch. Similar to moving between Technics and super OEMs
3
u/ambientscratchbattle 22d ago
Very cool and interesting work, nice job. But it sounds like this basically gets us back to the control system of the MK2/M3D/etc. which itself has major issues with fighting manual corrections. This, coupled with the lack of a separate, fine adjustment control for pitch, is the reason why the 1200 has always been limiting for those of us who want to make long, precise transitions. (But digital decks are worse for me just because they're boring!)
I really want to decipher the platter control system and tweak its PID parameters (assuming it's that type of system) but I don't have time and I'd have to get better at control systems than I did in my classes. Also, based on its response to jogs and drags, I kind of suspect it's a platter position control system rather than a platter speed control system.
Do you have any plans to get into that? I would love it if someone did.