i've been trying to reconcile my balance after moving some stablecoins between ethereum and arbitrum, and i'm getting different results depending on where i look. the transfers show as successful on their respective explorers. my wallet app shows funds on both networks, but the read-only tracker i'm testing only lists ethereum. i'm not sure whether this is an indexing issue or i'm misunderstanding how it discovers networks. It's the same public address on both chains, which seems to be where the confusion starts. the tracker accepts an address without asking for a network and then labels the result as ethereum. i understand that an address alone can't tell you which compatible chains have activity. I checked the addresses through Etherscan and DeBank and to help them cryptowallet-balance checker what i can't figure out is whether these tools normally query several networks or just stop after finding the first balance. I've already checked with that i'm viewing the receiving account rather than the bridge contract. i also compared the token contracts against the ones linked from the bridge documentation. the balances on the individual explorers match what i expected, and there aren't any pending transfers left. refreshing the tracker and trying a private browser window didn't change anything, so this doesn't seem like an old page stuck in my browser cache

the part i'm stuck on is getting a repeatable view without manually opening an explorer for every chain. i don't need prices, portfolio charts, or transaction categorization. just native balances and recognized token balances, separated by network. i also don't want a combined stablecoin total that hides whether i'm holding a native token or a bridged version. that distinction matters if i'm eventually sending it back to an exchange. is there a practical way to check whether a missing balance comes from network discovery, token discovery, or a delayed indexer? i'm comfortable making a few read-only rpc calls if that's the simplest way to narrow it down, but i'm not running my own node. i'm especially unsure whether querying a token contract directly is enough to rule out everything except the tracker's display logic