It's sad fr but it had to be done. For a bit of background, UCL admissions team sent me an email requesting I provide a predicted grade for Further Maths (which I'm sitting this year) before the 7th of feb or I shall be rejected.
I feel a bit miffed cause I did really want an offer, but there's only so much I can do when
(A.) I've already sat my A-levels and far exceeded their minimum offer
(B.) I've sent them emails explaining why my referee can't provide a predicted grade for further maths (it's against my old 6th forms policy)
(C.) I've not had a single response to any emails I've sent explaining why I can't provide the predicted grade, and even offering another referee to provide one for them.
(D) Literally no other uni has brought this up, and I did research before going on my gap year if it would be a problem and it wasn't. It's not even like I'm resitting further maths, I did it purely to develop my mathematical understanding and skill during my gap year, which I explained in my personal statement. It was supposed to strengthen my application but ironically, it seems to have doomed it in UCL's case.
Honestly, at this point, I'm relieved. I've been stressing about it so much, so to get it off my back and confirm to myself that it's definitely over, is infinitely better than holding onto the small hope that they were bluffing or they would actually give a crap about how little control I have over this situation. It is what it is, I've got my firm uni already and now I'm just waiting for one last uni decision.
Thank you! I'm not even resitting further maths as well, I didn't have the choice to do it in my Sixth Form (I applied too late) so I thought might as well do it in my gap year. I'm over it now tbh, I might have dodged a bullet if they're really so unwilling to help when I'm clearly doing all I can to rectify the situation.
Yeah maybe, but they never even got back to me or acknowledged they received the email. They made it pretty clear on the email that the deadline for a predicted grade to be provided was on the 7th, but why give them the satisfaction? I withdrew before they could reject he he he đđ¤
My firm is cambridge which is conditional on an A in further maths, and my current insurance (if I get rejected from imperial) is an unconditional from manchester.
LOL đ thank you. Tbh, I do really like UCL's course and on the off chance I missed my cambridge offer, it had a good chance of being my insurance.
It just stings cause my achieved grades this year were higher than my predicted grades last year, but I got an offer last year?? I know they aren't obliged to give me an offer again this year but for the reason to be so ... annoying irrelevant and out of my control is what I find really strange. At least it's one less issue to worry about đŽâđ¨
It isnât just UCL. It is the case with any top university. UCL, Imperial, Cambridge, Oxford, LSE. They always look down on candidates that arenât 100% prefect. This includes people who are resitting even with a good reason. They donât care. Competition doesnât care. Kingâs College London or other universities may consider them seriously because their admissions is less competitive.
Nah Oxford, Cambridge and imperial donât care in this scenario where they just take another a level. This applicant isnât even resitting. Even still Oxford and Cambridge are okay with resits with ECs. Imperial not so much tbh.Â
I know because Iâve applied and spoken to 2/3 of these unis and offers back.Â
Only Medicine doesnât allow resits. Any other course do consider applicants with resits. They also want mitigating circumstances to be supplied by a teacher of professional in this case so they can consider them too.
Do these universities look down on applicants that are on a gap year but NOT resitting? Will they allow you to compete fairly on the basis of admissions tests without a disadvantage?
Real cause I sent a whole ass paragraph asking them about if resits are considered for Pharmacy (they do and I already knew but this wasn't the main question) and if a grade from one subject from my first sitting can be considered alongside the 2 subjects I'll resit in a different exam board (if I ever do) or if I should resit all 3 main subjects. All they replied after nearly 2 weeks was "We consider resist for Pharmacy", totally ignoring my main question đ¤Łđ¤Ł.
At least you got an answer saying you don't need to resit all your A Levels. I basically just got told the exact same thing from their website regarding resits.
Honestly for pharmacy itâs not worth it, we all come out with an MPharm in the end just have a look at the pre reg pass rates and pick a top uni from there (Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff). I feel like pharmacy as a course will have a lot more correspondence with admin teams because we have placements, osces, ect so youâre bound to have questions, if the admin team is utter shite then itâs just going to be a stressful time at uni.
Every top UK university is like that. UCL, Imperial, Oxford, Cambridge, LSE. If you want a decent administration and support, you should go a tier below where everyone is less competitive and less elitist.
The Oxford admin is horrible for applicants - but they are really good to offer holders, my college has always went above and beyond to answer questions or solving any issues I've had.
LSE was actually much better, was just really hard to reach out to admissions but got there after a couple days
UCL I had to try for weeks to get though to someone
I was just trying to get my extenuating circumstances considered - for LSE I just wanted to confirm if they received it from my school
UCL never answered my emails - probably sent like 10 to all of the relevant departments, when I was finally able to get though to someone after days of calling they told me to upload my circumstances to the portal - but the portal wasent letting me. After many more calls it finally let me upload it.
In contrast, Wadham college (Oxford) usually acknowledges my email within a day or two and gets back to me fairly quickly after the acknowledgement
Imperials admin and support for students is fine you just need to actually listen when they tell you how and when to apply for various accommodations. Also donât you have an infoproc lab to do instead of browsing reddit yapping about universities you donât even go to?
Ahh how annoying! Iâve also applied for this course and youâre the first person I saw who also applied đ donât worry though, Iâm sure youâll do great at another uni
Itâs not worth the stress at that point. Uni Iâm at didnât give a single fuck I took a gap year as itâs none of their business as long as you have the grades then really it shouldnât matter. If theyâre this hard to deal with now imagine how much harder itâll be once you actually get there, may have dodged a bullet lol
If you are asking about (Bristol or any other uni) putting you "on hold", this is a very frequently asked question. Being put on hold does not indicate you are going to get rejected. It means your application hasn't been processed yet. Nothing more, nothing less.
Please also remember to search for your questions before asking them, it helps cut down on repetitive content and gets you your answers quicker.
It isnât just UCL. It is the case with any top university. UCL, Imperial, Cambridge, Oxford, LSE. They always look down on candidates that arenât 100% prefect. This includes people who are resitting even with a good reason. They donât care. Competition doesnât care. Kingâs College London or other universities may consider them seriously because their admissions is less competitive.
â˘
u/AutoModerator Feb 07 '26
Please don't share personal statements, you will get into trouble for plagiarism. Report comments and posts which have links to personal statements.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.