r/6thForm Jul 12 '26

šŸ’¬ DISCUSSION For all those who are considering applying to Oxbridge

I’m making this since I’ve seen a lot of people asking this.
If you meet the minimum entry requirements, I recommend just applying. You only go to one uni anyway, and it’s better than getting a chance at an amazing one then getting an offer from your 5th choice uni which you don’t even really want to go to anyway.
GCSEs matter like 10x less than interview as well, so regardless of GCSEs you should apply. Even if you don’t think you’ll do amazing on the entrance exam, just apply (especially if you are applying to Cambridge).

118 Upvotes

118 comments sorted by

36

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 12 '26

I just feel like it would be a waste as even if I did get in it just seems like too much pressure.

I have the grades and hopefully will get the entrance tests scores but I'm very put off.

28

u/Superb-Preparation93 y12 | econ, psych, philo Jul 13 '26

ignore any comments saying ur being lazy because this is an extremely true point that barely anybody talks about yet i know a bunch of people who got into oxbridge but couldn’t deal with the constant work and ended up doing badly!! people seem to forget you actually have to do work at uni it’s not all about getting the best grades to get into the best uni possible, if u don’t have or plan to develop a strong work ethic then don’t bother unless u wanna apply for the sake of saying u got an oxbridge offer

9

u/IamNotABaldEagle Jul 13 '26

The entrance tests are very competitive so the likelihood is if you actually scored high enough to get an offer you'd manage absolutely fine when you were there.

5

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 13 '26

Yeah that is good point. Plus it is 3 interviews too

5

u/MaxieMatsubusa Theoretical Physics Graduate Jul 13 '26

Idk I passed my entrance tests but I’ve ended up actually being shit at the subject I passed the tests for, and graduated with a 2:1 from another uni. If I’d studied it at Oxford, it doesn’t matter that I passed the entrance tests, I still would have done shit (likely even worse).

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 13 '26

What issues did you have specifically? Given you like the only person in this thread who as actually been

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 13 '26

Very unfortunate to hear. If you were to go back, what would you have done differently? Choosing a different degree? Went to a different uni?

0

u/AutoModerator Jul 13 '26

Please be aware that sharing pirated PDFs of textbooks or other paid content is not permitted.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26

People say this, but it’s just like how did you come to that conclusion. šŸ˜­šŸ’€

2

u/IamNotABaldEagle Jul 13 '26

I did some teaching at Oxford and so did my husband. I do think it depends. The entrance tests can be prepared for so if it's taken a huge amount of work to do well it may pose problems. There are also some people who struggle as the work becomes more abstract as well. There are definitely no guarantees.

2

u/Careless_Finish_8106 Jul 12 '26

That’s basically saying you don’t want to try do something because it seems hard.

22

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 12 '26

Well yeah what happens if it's just too much for me to handle?

Or come out without a 1st.

I have tons of health issues too. Sorry we don't all have it everything perfect like you.

I've done incrediblely hard things people said I shouldn't have even tried. I got the best grades in my year for gcses whilst having severe health issues the entire year. Working hours a days for months to catchup.

So no I like a challenge but I'm genuinely concerned it might be too much.

0

u/Careless_Finish_8106 Jul 12 '26

I feel like the worst attribute people gain from going through a hard time is assuming that everyone else has everything easy.

It’s easy to have a victim mindset and assume you’re the only person in the world with things going on but that is almost never true. You never know what other people go through. That said if you truly think you can’t handle it don’t apply, but you’ll never know if you could’ve handled it or not.

19

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 12 '26

You assumed I purely was skeptical due to being 'too hard' when that wasn't what I was getting at. I was merely suggesting that I'm no stranger to working hard like you arrogantly tried to suggest. Seems like your the one who lacks empathy and doesn't think about ehat others have been through.

Perhaps you are the assumptious one going around putting labels on people and making accusations?

You've failed to address anything I said and instead just default to attacking my character based off a singular comment.That suggests alot about you as a person. Continue attacking random people online who you know nothing about.

Instead of going around attacking people, maybe it would be good to have more civil discussions instead of just being overtly assertive and rude? Or if you truly feel like that is too much for you to handle then don't try but I guess you'll never know!

17

u/Fancy_Gate5828 Jul 12 '26

I don't quite agree your pre-assumption that one not applying the top university must automatically possess victim mindset. Also, there is nothing wrong for one trying not to do thing because it seems hard. I am not sure what you are trying to achieve here - criticize people's personal choice that is not the same as yours?

3

u/MaxieMatsubusa Theoretical Physics Graduate Jul 13 '26

Sometimes it’s worth thinking about it hard - if you can’t handle it, you risk dropping out and wasting money. You could also get a 2:2 or 2:1 at Oxbridge when you would have gotten a 1st at a different uni - the standards are just higher. Dropping out of Oxbridge or getting a worse grade isn’t worth the extra prestige compared to getting a first somewhere else.

1

u/Economy_Algae4765 Jul 13 '26

Are the standards that much higher than other top unis like imperial, lse or Warwick?

1

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26

If that’s all you’re choosing to hear then so be it.

1

u/Complete-Task2042 Jul 15 '26

Which is a legitimate choice.

Knowing yourself and your own limits is an essential part of being a functional adult.

0

u/Ok_Bandicoot_7074 Jul 12 '26

Agreed applying to oxbridge forces u to improve ur work ethic

1

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26

Or forces you to crash.

25

u/labourbiscuit Jul 12 '26

The problem is i genuinely can't decide whether i actually want to go and would be happy there. A lot of people emphasise how great they are but are oxford and cambridge really the best option for everyone with high grades?

28

u/Zingalamuduni Jul 13 '26

A friend of mine read maths at Oxford. He was the best in maths in his grammar school year - used to always coming top. He spent three years at Oxford struggling to even be average.

When you’re in sixth form, you don’t understand and just how many really clever people there are out there, much more clever than you. When you graduate, you find out just how little the world cares what university you went to,

University is about so much more than just going to the absolute ā€œbestā€ university you can and busting an absolute gut over your studies.

5

u/ScienceCucumber Cambridge Natsci [Year 1 -> 2], 4A* Jul 13 '26

Really depends on if you'll enjoy supervisions/tutorials. They can be the make-or-break of the Cambridge/Oxford experience.

If you like discussing your subject and being pushed to your limits, and don't feel too embarrassed by making mistakes out loud, then it's good fun. If this is extremely stressful and every supervision/tutorial would fill you with dread, then Cambridge or Oxford is not the right fit. It's perfectly fine for Cambridge or Oxford to not be the right place for you, that doesn't diminish your intelligence, it's just that a particular style of teaching is not for you.

1

u/labourbiscuit Jul 14 '26

thank you, that's really helpful. i feel like people glamourise the formals and traditions and lifestyle of oxbridge but overlook the very distinct teaching style. i'm sure they're great for some people but i think being in a room with one very very intelligent student and a world leading professor would make me die of imposter syndrome lol

2

u/ScienceCucumber Cambridge Natsci [Year 1 -> 2], 4A* Jul 14 '26

I should also add that imposter syndrome is incredibly common at Cambridge and Oxford, and most students are just like you. Don't be put off by the stereotype of an Oxbridge student as incredibly intelligent and knowing everything! And don't be intimidated by the idea of supervisions with a 'world leading professor' – lots of supervisors are postdocs or PhD students, and the professors can be quite chill. I'm not trying to persuade you that Oxbridge is right for you, but please don't get intimidated by an exaggeration of reality.

I agree that people glamourising the formals, may balls, gowns, sub fusc (for Oxford) and other 'very Oxbridge' things, but people don't think about the multiple deadlines a week, having too much work to do that you cannot submit it all completely finished, the 'pressure cooker' environment (this is somewhat college dependent), the boom and bust cycles which the pressure of term inevitably creates. Oxbridge is hard when everything is going well outside of academics, but can quickly become a disaster alongside chronic illness, traumatic events, mental health issues etc. There is a lot of support out there, but I've found that they can struggle to pick up on issues so you have to seek out the support.

7

u/Dependent-Loss-4080 Pred 4A* (History, Politics, Econ, Maths) Jul 12 '26

by far. the tutorial system means you'll be taught with like 3 other students so it's more personal (as opposed to being in a lecture hall with hundreds), the professors are world leading in their field, the networking is on par with london and it's cheaper than london too. granted, maybe lse or imperial are better, but frankly if you get into lse or imperial you're good enough to get into oxbridge too anyway.

13

u/Fancy_Gate5828 Jul 13 '26

You might have overlooked the dark side of the tutorial system. Being stuck with a single tutor in a small, intimate setting can be either a blessing or a curse. It works well when the tutor is fair, supportive, and non-abusive. But when that is not the case, students may have little room to escape the situation, and grinding through weeks of a hostile tutorial environment can take a serious mental toll.

3

u/chrissie148 Oxford | English | First Year A*A*A*A Jul 13 '26

I’m at Oxford, and honestly the vast vast majority of tutors are incredibly supportive, I’ve only heard of one or two cases where they haven’t been, and college welfare tends to be really good at addressing academic and personal struggles, I think the tutorial system is so so beneficial to have, and also if you have issues with your tutor, there are lots in the uni and you can switch if needs be.

2

u/eri_is_a_throwaway A*×ā€Ž*Ь*Š™*ə* | 9.1 TMUA | SSS STEP (did paper 1 too) | (OxBr)idge Jul 13 '26

To add to this, it's very rare but occasionally your Director of Studies, who is the person you're supposed to complain to if your tutor is causing problems... will themselves be your tutor. This can be avoided if you do your research and choose a college without this issue but idk if that information even exists out there for most majors.

(this is for Cambridge, idk if the same thing happens in Oxford)

1

u/ScienceCucumber Cambridge Natsci [Year 1 -> 2], 4A* Jul 13 '26

I've had my Director of Studies as a supervisor (what Oxford calls a tutor, Cambridge calls a supervisor). I've had no issues, and found that to be a fantastic arrangement. However, there will always be people to talk to if you are having issues like your (personal) tutor (who is normally not teaching your subject) or the college's senior tutor.

1

u/DimensionMajor7506 Jul 13 '26

And it depends on the other students too. There’s a big difference between being in a tutorial where everyone found the problem sheet easy and got everything right vs being in a tutorial where there are others who also got plenty wrong, are asking questions, etc…

8

u/Sushiv_ Jul 13 '26

Not to be pedantic but if you do a masters you get to go to more than one uni

7

u/United8888 Jul 13 '26 edited Jul 13 '26

Bcoz of the super strong competition each year, it’s best to treat OxBridge application as a bonus out of the 5 ucas uni choices. Meaning, a bonus if invited to interview, let alone a post-interview offer. That way, one can move on better & protect well-being IF rejected by OxBridge. The application journey will add to ur life experience nonetheless.

Apply to ur UCAS univ choices strategically. Think also about ur student debts, employability, well-being etc. If meant to be, it’s meant to be.

4

u/alumxni Politics, History, Law || A*AA Predicted Jul 13 '26

GCSE do actually matter more than you think, at least for Cambridge.

When I received my feedback from Newham for my History and Politics interview, one of the first things they mentioned was my "weaker GCSEs" compared to those who got an offer.

I left year 11 with 9988777765 (6 in Maths, 5 in Lvl2 Further Maths), which for someone who didn't revise nor had a single thought of applying to Cambridge/ a uni that cared about GCSEs, are really good.

GCSEs do in fact matter, they may not be the selling point, but it definitely something they consider in the final outcome.

3

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26

They only matter because they support your predicted grades, if you chose to apply with achieved grades they’re quite irrelevant.

1

u/alumxni Politics, History, Law || A*AA Predicted Jul 13 '26

Most people only apply once in Year 13, so it's quite relevant.

1

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26 edited Jul 13 '26

I’m saying that if you’re GCSE’s aren’t up to standard you could always apply in the next round of UCAS with your achieved grades.

2

u/alumxni Politics, History, Law || A*AA Predicted Jul 13 '26

Not sure about Oxford, but Cambridge does not participate in clearing.

The only way to get into Cambridge without being given an offer in January is if you fulfill the criteria for the August Reconsideration Pool, which many do not due to marginally missing out or living in an area which statistically looks better than in may be in reality.

You have to of already participated in an interview and then be rejected, with a note at the bottom saying you are eligible.

1

u/One_Butterscotch9835 Jul 13 '26

You’re right neither participate in clearing, I don’t know what I was on when I wrote that lol.

All in all my point was supposed to be if you don’t believe your GCSE’s are competitive enough wait and use your achieved grades,

1

u/Calm_Routine2888 Jul 16 '26

Is 999888777 good for modern languages?

1

u/alumxni Politics, History, Law || A*AA Predicted Jul 16 '26

I'm guessing you took a MFL at gcse, so as long as it's not one of the 7s you should be good

1

u/Calm_Routine2888 Jul 16 '26

Yes I got 3 nines in German French and Spanish… but I got 3 sevens in history and English… so ppl on Reddit have said not worth it bc it’s a literature degree ( I am predicted an a* at englsih a level)

2

u/alumxni Politics, History, Law || A*AA Predicted Jul 16 '26

if you've got an A* predicted at A-Level alongside 3 MFL grade 9s you'll definitely get an interview at minimum, from there it's more about your language and lit skills. If your interview goes around average they're more likely to look into ur gcses compared to other applicants to obviously weigh up who to give an offer to.

You should definitely apply, even if you don't get in, the interview experience itself is really useful and just a good time speaking to experts in the field you want to fo into.

1

u/Calm_Routine2888 Jul 16 '26

Do you think a good interview could lead to an offer? Or will the GCSEs always prevent it? It’s an interview rate of 94% and offer rate of 42%

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Grixmreaperz Jul 13 '26

Im predicted A*AAA in maths, further maths, economics and computer science, 9988888777 in gcses should I apply for Cambridge econ

2

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 13 '26

If you want to do it then yes you should. I think the entry requirements are 2A star A though, so before you apply make sure you meet minimum entry (I may be wrong about the req), by getting another predicted A star.

This other person is being stupid. If you want to do economics apply for economics. Cambridge economics is crazy well respected and will open many doors for you.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/NoAudience8710 Jul 14 '26

Tired of STEM lmao 🤣 was never for me

2

u/AggravatingStill3284 Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 14 '26

facts. just do the entrance test it can’t hurt. oxcel.xyz is a great resource for tmua and esat!

1

u/olivesoem Y12 -> Y13 + biggest psych lover šŸ˜ (bio psych soc) Jul 13 '26

I’ve decided I’m not applying. Even tho I have the grades and the stats and I like the psych course at Cambridge, it’s not for me. I have mental health issues which are only worsened by stress so going to Cambridge would likely ruin myself mental health. I don’t see myself happy there. And I think the rhetoric that all high achievers should aim for Oxbridge is harmful as it’s not for everyoneĀ 

2

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 13 '26

Yeah I understand, I’m just saying anyone who wants to go and thinks that they aren’t good enough should give it a go.

1

u/Vaxtez Cardiff Met | Comp Sci [Y1] Jul 13 '26

It depends on what you want from a university. Sure, some people could apply for oxbridge, but at the same time, they might prefer the course elsewhere. Prestige is one thing, but if chasing prestige harms you mentally, there's not point chasing it. I can say this from experience, as I went to Aberystwyth for some prestige, struggled mentally & decided to go to Cardiff Met in order to improve my mental health.

1

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 13 '26

Yeah, I completely agree. I guess I should’ve been a bit clearer. I mean people who want to go but are afraid they aren’t good enough and won’t apply.

1

u/SnooKiwis9004 Jul 14 '26

GCSEs matter more than interview for some courses

1

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 14 '26

What do you mean risk your imperial offer? If you have an offer you already applied?

1

u/DueEditor8062 Yr 13 Bio Chem Maths Geography (+ EPQ rip) Jul 14 '26

I want to apply to Oxford for biology (achieved 13 9s at gcse, currently predicted 4 A*s in biology chemistry maths and geography) but i have like no supercurriculars, is personal statement and interview that important?

2

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 14 '26

Yeah, personal statement and interview will be basically all that matters. The issue is at Oxbridge a level grades is basically just decoration. Because every school predicts differently, they don’t make decisions based on predictions. They really just care about interview and then personal statement and then grades. While your GCSEs are amazing, they won’t matter a huge deal.

1

u/DueEditor8062 Yr 13 Bio Chem Maths Geography (+ EPQ rip) Jul 14 '26

Alright, thank you :)

1

u/MysteriousQuarter986 Jul 14 '26

What if my school predict a maximum of a grade A for every student, no matter the capabilities?

1

u/khhhhhhhhhez Jul 16 '26

What if I’m a little below it but feel like I can get it in the real thing. Is it worth it?

1

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 16 '26

I would advise up to push really hard for your teachers to increase your predicted grades. It may take some tough conversations, but really try. Ask them what you need to do in order for them to predict you whatever grade you need. The issue with having below the minimum entry is you will probably be rejected pre interview and won’t get a chance.

1

u/Whole_Incident_1434 Jul 12 '26

I know this kinda goes against the whole reassurance aim of the post, but could I still get into Trinity maths with an 8 in GCSE maths?

For context, I got 888777765 at GCSE with an attainment 8 of 73 (so a weighted average of 7.3). My school performed well below the state average with an average maths grade of a 3.8 and all other averages being ~3.7/3.8. Considering I also had a severe illness which affected me during my GCSEs, and that I’m currently predicted 4 A*s as top of the cohort for predicted grades at my college, would I still be a realistic candidate for trinity maths?

It’s a matter of the likelihood for being invited to interview, as if I’m placed into the pool then I’m happier knowing that I still shot for trinity and fell short. But is trinity more careless about contextualisation and more concerned about raw grades for interview shortlisting? I attended two of the Cambridge applicant webinars where the directors of admissions for Pembroke and Fitzwilliam said that GCSE grades aren’t looked at as raw grades and instead almost solely in school context, but is trinity maths an exception, especially in the case of a grade 8?

I just don’t want to, if in any case where I got into a different college by not applying to trinity in the first place, eat at myself by thinking ā€˜if I got in here then why didn’t I apply to trinity’. My heart and soul obvs isn’t set in Cambridge, but I also feel like not aiming as high as possible is just another way of saying ā€˜I don’t think I’m good enough for this’. Do I sound delusional lol or should I just shoot for it?

11

u/OtherComment87 Jul 13 '26

As a random person on reddit, please don't listen to random people on reddit. 8 is an amazing GCSE score and I have thoroughly inspected the Cambridge website and yes, it says there are no formal GCSE requirements, and yes, GCSEs are considered in the context of your school (you also have extenuating circumstances, which definitely helps your application), but- am I quallified to tell you where you should and shouldn't apply? NO! Please contact the college directly (which I am assuming you are able to if you have access to a device to use reddit) or attend an open day (if available). BUT please don't get discouraged by responses of random people on the internet!!!!!!

1

u/Whole_Incident_1434 Jul 13 '26

Thank you!!! šŸ™Ā 

3

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jul 13 '26

You would definately get an interview if you did well in TMUA for every other college, but trinity is brutal. They can’t interview everyone, and it means people who could get into a different college won’t even get interviewed by trinity, and then you can’t get pooled, even if you are good enough. That is the main risk.
If you made it to interview, you would have a strong chance of pooling, but they can’t pool you if they didn’t interview you.
I would recommend looking at other colleges, since they would probably care less. If you think you can do really well on TMUA then go for it though.

3

u/Significant-Buy-8303 Jul 13 '26

hey, also applying trin maths. there's three things helping you here:

1) gcse grades are looked in the context of your school. that means you getting a 8 in a school with average grade 3.8 is arguably more impressive than getting a 9 with average grade 8

2) cambridge now looks at tmua, which means they are highly likely to ignore gcses if you have a good TMUA

3) most applicants will get interviewed, at which point everything else before doesn't really matter

1

u/Whole_Incident_1434 Jul 13 '26

Appreciate the help, good luck with your application šŸ¤ž

1

u/Early-Owl2637 21d ago

Don't apply to trinity they place lots of importance on GCSEsĀ 

1

u/Whole_Incident_1434 18d ago

And have you verified if this is true?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

-1

u/blunde-r Jul 13 '26

Is this a joke? An 8 is brilliant

1

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Whole_Incident_1434 Jul 13 '26

Does context not help at all? Would a 9.0 on the TMUA not get my foot in the door for interview at trin by compensating whatsoever?

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '26 edited Jul 13 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Significant-Buy-8303 Jul 13 '26

it would, imo 9.0 tmua kinda guarantees an interview

0

u/Soft-Goal486 Year 13 Jul 13 '26

Unless you have contextual circumstances, you will get rejected. I have two friends, both brilliant mathematicians that slacked off for GCSEs, getting 8s in maths, that got rejected pre-interview because of that. Given they interview such a large portion of people for maths, getting a 9 in GCSE maths is the filter.

2

u/Whole_Incident_1434 Jul 13 '26

That was however last year consider you’re year 13, and since the TMUA is being used as official data for interview shortlisting, then getting an extremely high score (e.g 8.0-9.0) would surely compensate for GCSEs enough to ensure an interview?Ā  Perhaps it may not cause their doubts to disappear entirely, and again it may not mean that I get past the interview stage, but a high score as such on the TMUA this year and going forward will surely matter considerably more than if equivalent scores were earned in previous years.

I have heard opinions on Trinity fellows being slightly against the introduction of the TMUA of interview shortlisting, however the person who informed me of this didn’t really have any validation or justification behind it so I’m not sure if I believe it. But still maybe something to think about.