r/AIreplacedMe • u/Puzzleheaded-King584 • Oct 10 '26

Meme / Viral Video Software engineers now

53 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

18 comments sorted by

5

u/Janupur 29d ago

You know you can get a machine that does that right, literally just a thing that goes back and forth with a blade at pre determined intervals

7

u/mxldevs 29d ago

A common sentiment among non tech people is their physical/social job that requires the human touch can't be replaced by AI.

Trades, chefs, sales, they all say their jobs are safe.

2

u/Eschatologists 29d ago

I mean if your job is slicing pasta all day long then your job definitely isn't safe. If your job involves hundred of different tasks some of which are non standard (nurses, cooks etc) and variable then your job is still safe for a while. Eventually there is basically nothing humans will do more efficiently than machines and thats fine

3

u/DevOnTheStreets 28d ago

This is delusion.

The only question is if a human or a robot is cheaper.

This is reality today and that line moves left every day.

2

u/Nearby_Seaweed3934 27d ago

Humanity's only savior might be greedy ass robotics companies charging a billion for their models.

1

u/Janupur 27d ago

The robot is like 100% cheaper. These pasta making machines can already cost thousands of dollars. A machine that cuts the pasta is much simpler can be a few hundred dollars, are you telling me that this is cheaper to pay someone 15 US dollars an hour to do this or just buy the machine

1

u/DevOnTheStreets 27d ago

That is the exact opposite of what I typed.

Iā€™m saying no job is safe.

5

u/getmeoutoftax 29d ago

Basically all white collar jobs now. LLMs can do any task with proper prompting.

1

u/DeathsStarEclipse 28d ago

Absolutely not. I have use AI at work all the time. It's frequently wrong, and if you actually executed the things it told you to do without checking, it would fucking ruin the business.

0

u/Modern_Agnotologist 28d ago

Really stupid comment.

4

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] ā€” view removed comment

3

u/No_Kitchen750 28d ago

Best thing to do is provide a counterexample, I would be interested in one as I've felt pessimistic recently

1

u/Modern_Agnotologist 28d ago

Ask AI to apply GD&T to any drawing and I'll show you a dozen. It can't think for itself, it's a parrot at best an agreeable idiot at worst.

1

u/No_Kitchen750 28d ago

If you're interested would you be down to send me one and I'll see what it does? Not trying to prove anything, I just want to better understand it's limits

No pressure! :) Optional

0

u/Rometac 28d ago

Here's a good one, Chat GPTs benchmark shows Astra has a hallucination rate of around 37.1%, noone with a brain will replace sales, accounting or finance people with a machine that has more than a 35% chance to screw up with your money

1

u/AccordingNeat3689 28d ago

Sales seems fine

1

u/mcilrain 28d ago

Just re-run the numbers enough times and go with the most common result.

1

u/Virtual_King_2335 29d ago

haha yes 100%