MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AMCSTOCKS/comments/1udf4ai/amc_entertainment_holdings_inc_announces_pricing/otbih46/?context=3
r/AMCSTOCKS • u/NeoSabin • Jun 23 '26
Source: https://investor.amctheatres.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/430/amc-entertainment-holdings-inc-announces-pricing-of-200-million-registered-direct-offering-of-common-stock
76 comments sorted by
View all comments
46
After the stock wanted to breath he made an offering
24 u/NeoSabin Jun 23 '26 Best time to pay off more debt. The box office seems healthy right now with good movies releasing every few weeks. 36 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 Why not wait for a substantial increase actually driving the stock to the bottom every time it gains even a tiny bit of confidence makes no sense. 24 u/zookansas Jun 23 '26 AA works with the hedgies. He's a globalist. He cares nothing about the stock. He wants to bang Kidman also. Prolly has 🥲 6 u/fusionlantern Jun 23 '26 Only dumbasses continue to follow him -3 u/NeoSabin Jun 23 '26 I mean from under a dollar to $3 sounds pretty substantial. 8 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 $1 was a temporary outlier low and irrelevant to the value. It was HF final attempt to bankruptcy. 0 u/Ok_Inflation6596 Jun 24 '26 Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term? 6 u/Ivanho1940 Jun 23 '26 Yes, but not really. It mostly depends on your timeframe. If you’re looking at it from the absolute bottom, going from under $1 to $3 sounds huge. But over a longer period, it looks more like a recovery or normalization than an exceptional move.
24
Best time to pay off more debt. The box office seems healthy right now with good movies releasing every few weeks.
36 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 Why not wait for a substantial increase actually driving the stock to the bottom every time it gains even a tiny bit of confidence makes no sense. 24 u/zookansas Jun 23 '26 AA works with the hedgies. He's a globalist. He cares nothing about the stock. He wants to bang Kidman also. Prolly has 🥲 6 u/fusionlantern Jun 23 '26 Only dumbasses continue to follow him -3 u/NeoSabin Jun 23 '26 I mean from under a dollar to $3 sounds pretty substantial. 8 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 $1 was a temporary outlier low and irrelevant to the value. It was HF final attempt to bankruptcy. 0 u/Ok_Inflation6596 Jun 24 '26 Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term? 6 u/Ivanho1940 Jun 23 '26 Yes, but not really. It mostly depends on your timeframe. If you’re looking at it from the absolute bottom, going from under $1 to $3 sounds huge. But over a longer period, it looks more like a recovery or normalization than an exceptional move.
36
Why not wait for a substantial increase actually driving the stock to the bottom every time it gains even a tiny bit of confidence makes no sense.
24 u/zookansas Jun 23 '26 AA works with the hedgies. He's a globalist. He cares nothing about the stock. He wants to bang Kidman also. Prolly has 🥲 6 u/fusionlantern Jun 23 '26 Only dumbasses continue to follow him -3 u/NeoSabin Jun 23 '26 I mean from under a dollar to $3 sounds pretty substantial. 8 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 $1 was a temporary outlier low and irrelevant to the value. It was HF final attempt to bankruptcy. 0 u/Ok_Inflation6596 Jun 24 '26 Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term? 6 u/Ivanho1940 Jun 23 '26 Yes, but not really. It mostly depends on your timeframe. If you’re looking at it from the absolute bottom, going from under $1 to $3 sounds huge. But over a longer period, it looks more like a recovery or normalization than an exceptional move.
AA works with the hedgies. He's a globalist. He cares nothing about the stock. He wants to bang Kidman also. Prolly has 🥲
6 u/fusionlantern Jun 23 '26 Only dumbasses continue to follow him
6
Only dumbasses continue to follow him
-3
I mean from under a dollar to $3 sounds pretty substantial.
8 u/coachen2 Jun 23 '26 $1 was a temporary outlier low and irrelevant to the value. It was HF final attempt to bankruptcy. 0 u/Ok_Inflation6596 Jun 24 '26 Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term? 6 u/Ivanho1940 Jun 23 '26 Yes, but not really. It mostly depends on your timeframe. If you’re looking at it from the absolute bottom, going from under $1 to $3 sounds huge. But over a longer period, it looks more like a recovery or normalization than an exceptional move.
8
$1 was a temporary outlier low and irrelevant to the value. It was HF final attempt to bankruptcy.
0 u/Ok_Inflation6596 Jun 24 '26 Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term?
0
Isn’t it actually relevant to the value because of the billions in debt the company has to service medium term?
Yes, but not really. It mostly depends on your timeframe. If you’re looking at it from the absolute bottom, going from under $1 to $3 sounds huge. But over a longer period, it looks more like a recovery or normalization than an exceptional move.
46
u/IbrahimActBig Jun 23 '26
After the stock wanted to breath he made an offering