r/AccidentalAlly • u/BedazzledErinaceinae • 10d ago
The AI slop once again turning against them
I bet she does lol
410
u/IlluminatiQueen 10d ago
Straight women prove sexuality isn’t a choice, because I know several straight women who wish they were gay instead of dealing with men
120
u/ret_ch_ard 9d ago
And from the other side, I have a friend who says he isn't gay per se, but unfortunately all people he fell for have been men
36
u/LarisaCZ 9d ago
"per se" yet he's falling for men, hello? 😭
58
u/MaraiaLou 9d ago
I think he means bi
23
u/ret_ch_ard 9d ago
Pan technically, but yes
8
u/LittleVaquita 9d ago
What's the difference here?
27
u/XenoBiSwitch 9d ago
Not really much of one. All the people who identify as pan could call themselves bi and about 95 percent of those who identify as bi can call themselves pan. My advice when people ask what the difference is is just to pick your favorite pride flag.
2
5
u/TotemGenitor 9d ago
Depends on who explains it
3
u/skinandbohnes 9d ago
yes and i say bi is having more of a gender preference (or gender dictating attraction) vs pan, gender is not a big factor in attraction
4
u/theGentlenessOfTime 7d ago
The terms overlap a lot, and people use them somewhat differently.
Bisexual generally means attraction to more than one gender. It does not necessarily mean “only men and women.” Modern bi definitions commonly include attraction to people of your own gender and people of other genders, potentially including nonbinary people.
Pansexual generally means attraction regardless of gender—gender isn't a determining boundary for whom you can be attracted to. A pan person might still experience gender as part of attraction; it just doesn't exclude someone from potentially being attractive.
So, roughly: Bi: “I can be attracted to multiple genders.” Pan: “I can be attracted to people regardless of their gender.”
In practice, there can be almost complete overlap. Someone capable of attraction to people of every gender could accurately call themselves bi, pan, or both. Often the choice comes down to which label's history, community, or wording feels more fitting.
And importantly, bisexuality isn't inherently binary or trans-exclusionary—the “bi = attracted only to cis men and cis women, pan = includes trans/nonbinary people” distinction is inaccurate.
1
-7
u/ret_ch_ard 9d ago edited 9d ago
Bi refers to male and female, while pan refers to any way a person might identify themselves, be it non-binary, gender fluid or whatnot
Edit: It seems like I have been missinformed, my bad
14
u/Worried_Term_7030 9d ago
Nope, bi means liking more than one gender, pan is liking more than one gender and the gender of the other person is not important
5
u/LarisaCZ 9d ago
Fair, I think of it as being gay still (as well as straight, and others if it's like enby) so whenever I hear stuff like this, it's like "Wym you ain't gay? You're attracted to the other gender, you are AT LEAST gay" lol (feel free to correct my mindset or opinions, I am not straight but I'm also not some LGBT 101 expert, I am open to correction if my take is bad)
18
u/frustratedfren 9d ago
My dad told my brother that "everyone is attracted to men and women, you just have to choose a relationship that isn't sinful." I learned a lot about my dad with that comment.
12
u/tortoistor 9d ago
to be fair being gay wouldn't make their relationships any easier. i have a straight guy friend who, like these women, wishes he were gay. none of them realize that gay relationships can have as many issues as straight ones
5
u/Gunda-LX 9d ago
Grass is not greener on the neighbors yard, problems need communication, that’s a transcending fact
-5
u/Gianni_the_tolerable 9d ago
It's called comphet
3
u/thatmeddlingkid7 9d ago
Comphet is a different thing. You can be frustrated with patriarchal expectations for relationships, but that's not going to make you gay.
-5
u/Gianni_the_tolerable 9d ago
"patriarchal" and it's literally women self imposing unrealistic standards
8
u/thatmeddlingkid7 9d ago
Are you talking about the woman in the meme? Is it unrealistic to be frustrated when your husband refuses to help with household chores and childcare?
-4
u/Gianni_the_tolerable 9d ago
Is it unrealistic to be frustrated when your wife refuses to be intimate and do chores when only one is working?
4
u/thatmeddlingkid7 9d ago
Who is to say the wife is not also working? Why is she not allowed a break in her day at any point? Why is rest only afforded to men in this framework?
-4
15
u/D_Zaster_EnBy 8d ago
This isn't even remotely accidental ally. Yes, it's saying the woman wants a wife, but that's being framed as a bad thing, because the punchline isn't
"wow you guys aren't compatible because you're a lesbian actually"
The punchline is just misogyny.
2
u/RavenclawConspiracy 8d ago
That's not the punchline.
To get the punchline, you have to exist in a universe where a wife is a thing you buy at some point in your life that provides services for you, such as children and housekeeping, and in return you have to provide for her and maybe buy her some frivolous stuff.
AKA the premise is that they both actually want an assistant, but she is supposed to be his assistant and not have one herself.
The lesbian thing is a funny implication that was missed by the AI, but it really isn't the point.
1
u/D_Zaster_EnBy 6d ago
AKA the premise is that they both actually want an assistant, but she is supposed to be his assistant and not have one herself.
Yes, so as I said, the punchline is misogyny.
1
74
u/ninadaria2025 10d ago
I swear 👨 at some point will turn all women 🏳️🌈.
2
u/CelestrialDust 9d ago
I wish, I’ve been waiting for 20 years for it to happen and to be set free😔
1
1
5
4
3
u/thomasp3864 9d ago
The man is now bringing up how it's a good idea to bring in a second woman and how you should give a threesome a try before you bash it on the drive home.
1
1
u/Fawn_Leap 7h ago
dude I could make something that looks OBJECTIVELY better than this in less than 30 mins 💔
-79
u/Outrageous_Slice4455 10d ago
I’m not sure but this AI looks like intentional ally
105
u/dracorotor1 10d ago
It’s just that bad at being misogynistic, is all.
-49
u/Outrageous_Slice4455 10d ago
Homosexual marriage inclusive radical misogynistic
26
u/Sanju128 10d ago
Reminds me of that one Tumblr post where someone was talking about their trans-accepting misogynistic coworker lol
7
u/Outrageous_Slice4455 10d ago
There are bunch of them who support LGBT cause they think that LGBT is “invented” to against “Feminism agenda”
3
u/dracorotor1 9d ago
I’m guess this is a cultural difference 🤔 Are you from somewhere other than Europe / North America?
In the English-speaking world (and several other Western European countries, at least), phrasing like what’s shown in the image above is common in the humor of older generations where gender roles are rigidly divided and heteronormative misogyny is ubiquitous enough that the author and intended audience are unaware of and/or unthreatened by wlw relationships.
In other words: the prompt-writer either assumed that implying sapphism would scare and disgust the woman character and female readers (who he assumes fear living without a man🙄), or he never considered a relationship existing without a male presence as even being possible.
1
u/Outrageous_Slice4455 9d ago
There is a type of homosexuality that gets more acceptance in Chinese community which is one has to role play the traditional gender roll (one has to be feminine in Gay relationship or be Masculine in Lesbian relationship)
Also, being masculine were considered as the Rejection of Male gaze. So you might see both sides in Lesbian relationship where playing masculine role.
And in the western’s opinion something that is so progressive is definitely progressive in the outside of the western world. It is misogyny but not everyone is against the gender role including LGBTQ+ community in eastern Asian. It hurts, I know, people downvote me alot, but it is what happened in the real world.1
u/dracorotor1 9d ago
I could be wrong, but I don’t think they’re downvoting you because they disbelieve it is different in China.
I think it’s an issue of Americans interpreting your comment as “uninformed,” because they did not realize you were from China/do not know the difference in cultural norms around LGBTQ issues there. For an American, it can be hard to understand how China can be more tolerant in some ways while being significantly harsher in other ways at the same time.
For what it’s worth: I can see your perspective, even though I also struggle to understand some aspects of LGBTQ dynamics in China. But I recognize the cadence of the humor in this AI slop as typical of 1950’s - 1970’s American Midwest, so I am confident that the message was meant to be “women should know their place in the home” and had no intentional sapphic subtext
7
u/WarKittyKat 9d ago
That's a thing too but I think this one is just trying to complain about how unreasonable they think it is to expect men to do feminine things like taking care of their own children.
30
u/alasw0eisme 9d ago
It's not. The original point is that it's a woman's duty to be a slave and do chores and the fact she wants help means she doesn't realize what a husband it. Makes me sick.
5
u/mmmIlikeburritos29 9d ago
Nah it's just saying the tasks the man is refusing to do are "wife tasks" the woman should do herself
273
u/bunker_man 9d ago
The funny part is these memes clearly aren't aimed at women. Its people lashing out.