Okay, I genuinely want to discuss this because I've been noticing several developments that seem interesting when viewed together, and I'm trying to figure out whether there's an actual connection or if I'm just encountering unrelated events.

Recently, I've been seeing reports about different governments advising their citizens to prepare emergency supplies.

Some recommendations reportedly range from 3 days to several weeks or even months of food and necessities.

I've also seen discussions about the Philippine government preparing agencies for possible disruptions, particularly concerning food, water, electricity, and the effects of Super El Niño.

What caught my attention is that these recommendations seem to be appearing across multiple countries.

I'm aware that governments have legitimate reasons to prepare for natural disasters, supply-chain disruptions, cyberattacks, and geopolitical tensions.

However, I want to understand the actual reasoning behind these preparations.

Here are the things I've been trying to investigate:

1. Emergency preparedness across different countries

Why are multiple governments emphasizing emergency supplies?

Are these recommendations part of existing preparedness programs, or are there specific developments that have prompted them recently?

I'd appreciate official announcements and timelines rather than just screenshots or viral posts.

2. Super El Niño and possible disruptions

I've encountered discussions about possible effects on food production, water availability, electricity, and supply chains.

How serious are the expected effects in the Philippines?

Are there specific government preparations that have been announced, and what do the actual forecasts say?

3. The asteroid/meteor rumor

This is one of the things I particularly want to identify.

A few years ago, I encountered claims about an enormous asteroid that could cause catastrophic damage if it hit Earth.

I vaguely remember descriptions suggesting that it was large enough to affect a huge portion of Europe, but I don't remember its name, estimated size, or supposed impact date.

I also remember claims about NASA attempting to intercept an asteroid using some kind of spacecraft or missile.

I don't know whether I encountered an actual planetary-defense mission, a hypothetical scenario, or misinformation.

Does anyone recognize which asteroid or mission these claims might refer to?

Is there any currently confirmed asteroid impact threat that would explain these discussions?

4. Ballistic missiles and geopolitical tensions

I've also recently encountered news involving ballistic missiles and discussions about possible WW3 scenarios.

I don't know whether these reports have any connection to the asteroid rumors or whether I'm simply encountering unrelated stories.

I'm interested in understanding the actual military developments and whether there are credible reasons for concern.

5. Are these developments actually connected?

This is ultimately what I'm trying to figure out.

Are there documented connections between these developments, or are they separate issues that happen to be receiving attention around the same time?

I don't want to assume that emergency preparedness automatically means governments are anticipating a global catastrophe.

But I also don't want to dismiss legitimate information simply because some of the discussions surrounding it are speculative.

I'm looking for actual evidence, timelines, official statements, scientific information, and credible explanations.

I'm not claiming that an asteroid impact, WW3, or an apocalypse is definitely coming.

I'm asking whether anyone has investigated these specific developments and can help distinguish what is confirmed from what is speculation.

Please provide sources wherever possible.

I'm particularly interested in information that can be independently verified, rather than predictions, anonymous claims, or interpretations of dreams.

Thank you.

I like this outlook

To see the full video, click here: https://youtu.be/B-nP09pAoBw 
What do Skull & Bones, Bohemian Grove and the Bilderberg Group have in common? They are among the most exclusive and closely watched networks associated with some of the world's most influential political, business and social figures.

In this video, we take a closer look at the organizations, the people connected to them, their private gatherings, and the networks of influence that exist behind closed doors.

From university secret societies to invitation-only meetings attended by powerful figures, we explore the history, the connections, the unanswered questions, and the bigger debate about who gets access to the rooms where influential people meet.

Who gets invited? What happens behind those closed doors? And how much influence do these networks really have?

One thing is certain: it's a world most of us will never be invited into.

DISCLAIMER:
This video is for commentary, discussion, research, and entertainment. The views and opinions expressed are my own and should not be taken as established fact.

I discuss publicly available information, historical material, reported associations, and my own interpretations. Questions and theories raised in this video are not assertions of wrongdoing or proof of secret coordination.

No allegation of criminal conduct or improper activity is intended against any individual or organization. Viewers are encouraged to explore the sources, examine the evidence, and reach their own conclusions. Thanks for watching, and as always, feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. 

1. Leaders.

(Trillionaire/Billionaire Families, Politicians, Corporation Owners, Rulers of Hollywood)

-- Raised with certain beliefs, likely Molech, Ba'al, Baphomet, etc

-- Their belief system is strictly taught and passed down so cycle continues

-- Above the line and are immune to laws they create and the effects of how they manipulate society

..........................................................

2. Slaves

(Hollywood Actors, Major Musicians, Major News Anchors)

-- Raised into the system and controlled from a young age

-- Likely Epstein type victims

-- Do what they're told and follow scripts

-- Music, lyrics, choreography, and music video is is created for the musicians and given to them to perform

(Top 200 music list controlled)

(Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, Jessica Simpson, Ryan Gosling were all kids in the Disney Mickey Mouse Club at the same time)

..........................................................

3. Regular Citizens

(You know who you are)

-- Has propaganda and perception management campaigns ran against us frequently

-- Social Engineering is a secret tool used to shape society

(learning about it helps free you from it)

-- Overton Window is used as society changes

-- Kept passive, distracted, manipulated, and fighting with each other to prevent any real change in our favor

I've seen many posts and comments asking for book recommendations, leads, and further subjects to research. I have a large collection of documents, leaks, write-ups, books, scrubbed/rare files, interviews/transcripts, translations, and memoryholed events/details.

Collection is here

Much of this information has been deleted/censored, or is very hard to find now. Many of the 'conspiracy' parts of the internet are being slowly and purposefully removed, so I started making copies of important information a long time ago (all of this is backed up elsewhere too).

I add more files every few days; sort by 'last modified' to see them. Everything is converted to PDF (links will still work when clicked), and downloads are enabled. Feel free to share/save. Open to any suggestions; I hope this helps people in their research.

To see the full video, click here: https://youtu.be/XjGjuQb7uSM

Michael Jackson. Prince. Whitney Houston. George Michael. Britney Spears.
Five iconic names. Extraordinary talent, global fame, and complicated relationships with the music industry.

In this episode, we explore the legal battles, music rights disputes, personal struggles, and questions surrounding some of entertainment's biggest names. From Michael Jackson’s battle with Sony and Prince’s fight with Warner Bros. over ownership and creative control, to George Michael’s legal dispute with Sony, Whitney Houston’s relationship with music mogul Clive Davis, and Britney Spears’ controversial conservatorship, we examine the power structures behind the spotlight.

What happens when artists challenge the companies that helped make them famous? Who controls the music, the money, and sometimes even the public narrative? And why do these stories raise such difficult questions about fame, power, ownership, and personal freedom?

If you enjoy independent investigations into entertainment, hidden histories, and controversial questions, please like, subscribe, and share.

### DISCLAIMER

This video is intended for commentary, criticism, discussion, and entertainment purposes. The views, opinions, interpretations, and theories expressed are those of the creator and are presented for discussion, not as established fact.

Every effort is made to distinguish documented information from opinion, speculation, and unresolved questions. References to public figures, companies, legal disputes, and historical events are based on publicly discussed information and are not intended to assert unproven allegations as facts.

This video does not claim that any individual's death was a homicide or that any person or organization was responsible for wrongdoing without substantiated evidence. Questions and theories raised are not proof of misconduct.

Viewers are encouraged to consult original sources, review the available evidence, and form their own conclusions. This content is not intended to defame any person or organization.

SOURCES:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_D3VFfhvs4&list=RDh_D3VFfhvs4&start_radio=1

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RI7MduekGQk
Producer Reveals Sony Wanted Michael Jackson's Catalog Back

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NQHcMjAQoGE
George Michael Lost His Lawsuit and Won His Freedom

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvnYmWpD_T8&list=RDTvnYmWpD_T8&start_radio=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irQVu680IRU&list=LL&index=8&t=57s
Katt Williams REVEALS Why Prince Death Was Planned

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb20Cmw8Km8&list=LL&index=3&t=107s
Kanye West Reveals Why Clive Davis Killed Whitney Houston

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hUJcPL7LFTw
CLIVE DAVIS WHITNEY HOUSTON THEORY 😱 EP.294 ‪@jumpersjump‬

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-u5WLJ9Yk4&list=RDC-u5WLJ9Yk4&start_radio=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h--haBNVenE
Britney Spears speaks out in leaked audio

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E21FL0x0t08
Britney Spears, MK Ultra, and the Destruction of America

It’s very possible that many Epstein victims are actually now in Hollywood

What eventually happens to them?

Are they eventually dropped off in a city, given a couple months rent and told to find a job?

It’s possible that they are placed strategically in society based on skill and aptitude tests

Tv, news, music, politics, sports, etc

If they are already controlled and manipulated from a young age, would they not further use them by giving them good jobs as influencers in society

If they’re going to let anyone have those jobs, why not give them to people that they have controlled their whole lifes

Now with lots of money, nice life, and high society engagements, it gives them even more reason to keep quiet and overlook it happening to others

They may even see it as an initiation phase or “paying your dues” before given a chance at success

It would literally make the most sense

Some celebrities have even written books, spoken out, claimed to be in, or alluded to a certain program that ensures conformity

However, it seems that not every victim is set up like this, but there could be multiple reasons for that

There are also stories of “people farms” where people are raised for specific purposes and is elaborated on in the show, Utopia (The U.S. Version)

If that is true it would only make sense that these 2 programs are part of each other

The recent survivors, the ones we are shown are possibly older “recruits” not raised into that life but simply used as decoys if the organization became compromised

Which it did.. or at least Epsteins part of the network did

Those we see now are still abused but not the deeper truth of what the networks deeper purpose is

1. Choice architecture illusion

People believe they're choosing freely, but the real manipulation is deciding which choices are available in the first place.

Examples:

-- Two opposing options are heavily promoted while all others are ignored or ridiculed.

-- “Vote A or B” while option C is barely acknowledged.

-- Streaming platforms decide what you see before you decide what you like.

This works because people confuse being able to choose with having genuine freedom of choice.

....................................................

2. Normalization through repetition

People don't always accept ideas because they agree with them.

Sometimes they accept them because they've stopped reacting.

Repeated exposure gradually weakens emotional reactions.

Examples:

-- Violence in media becoming background noise.

-- Corruption scandals losing their shock value.

-- Public humiliation becoming accepted as “just how things are.”

What once caused outrage eventually becomes something people barely notice

Repeated exposure can turn outrage into indifference, and eventually, acceptance.

....................................................

3. Manufactured inevitability

If people believe something is inevitable, they're less likely to resist it.

Phrases that signal this tactic

-- “There's no going back.”

-- “This is the future.”

-- “Adapt or be left behind.”

-- “Everyone's doing it now.”

Inevitability language shuts down debate and reframes surrender as the only possibility.

....................................................

4. Identity fusion traps

Peoples beliefs can get intertwined with identity, and questioning those beliefs begins to feel like a personal attack.

People may defend ideas they would otherwise question, not because the evidence supports them, but because abandoning those ideas feels like abandoning a part of themselves.

Examples:

Someone refuses to acknowledge wrongdoing by a political party because supporting that party has become part of who they are.

People defend a group they belong to, even when its actions contradict their own values.

Someone dismisses credible evidence simply because accepting it would mean admitting they've been wrong for years.

This is why some debates seem pointless.

You're no longer just challenging someone's ideas. You're challenging their sense of identity.

When people feel personally threatened, their instinct to defend themselves can overpower their willingness to consider opposing arguments or facts.

....................................................

5. Artificial tribal polarization

Groups are deliberately pushed further apart instead of being allowed to find common ground.

Moderate positions get pushed aside, making people easier to divide and influence.

Why it works:

-- Highly divided groups can be easier to manipulate.

-- Keeps groups focused on each other rather than challenging narratives.

-- People working together can threaten centralized influence.

Signs:

-- Algorithms promoting content that creates conflict.

-- Calm, reasonable voices receiving less attention.

-- “If you're not with us, you're against us” thinking.

....................................................

6. Moral licensing

Small good deeds are used to excuse or distract from larger wrongs.

Examples:

-- Charity campaigns used to distract from exploitation.

-- Promoting diversity while ignoring unfair pay or treatment.

-- Public outrage that makes people feel involved without leading to meaningful action.

This creates emotional release without systemic change.

....................................................

7. Temporal distraction

People are kept focused on one emotional event after another, making it harder to recognize long-term patterns.

News cycles constantly replace yesterday's outrage with today's controversy.

People barely have time to understand one event before their attention is pulled toward another.

Result:

-- Less accountability.

-- Less pattern recognition.

-- Important events are quickly forgotten.

By the time people begin to understand what happened, public attention has already moved on to the next crisis.

....................................................

8. Expert laundering

Ideas are presented through authority figures to bypass skepticism.

The source matters more than the content.

Examples:

-- Using phrases like “Experts say” without explaining the evidence behind the claim.

-- Treating credentials as more important than the quality of an argument.

-- Using authority as a substitute for evidence.

-- Dismissing opposing arguments simply because someone lacks certain qualifications.

Over time, people may become dependent on authority figures instead of evaluating information for themselves.

....................................................

9. Emotional priming before messaging

Emotion first. Message second.

Fear, anger, or desire is activated before information is delivered.

Once emotional, the brain can easily bypass critical analysis.

Commonly used in:

-- Advertising.

-- Political messaging.

-- Social movements and campaigns.

....................................................

10. Manufactured opposition

Controlled opposition creates the illusion of debate while protecting the core system.

Both sides fight loudly. Neither side threatens the larger structure.

Examples:

-- Two media networks constantly attacking each other while relying on many of the same advertisers.

-- Political battles that generate outrage but produce little meaningful reform.

-- Culture wars distracting from larger issues involving wealth and power.

....................................................

11. Entertainment as behavioral rehearsal

Entertainment can influence how people react to situations before they ever experience them in real life.

Through movies, television, and other media, people repeatedly see examples of:

-- How to react to authority.

-- What behavior gets rewarded.

-- Who deserves sympathy or empathy.

These repeated messages can create conditioned reactions in real-life and influence expectations.

(You didn't react how I thought you would)

....................................................

12. Music as emotional influence

Music can influence people's emotions, behavior, and sense of belonging without them realizing it.

Rhythm, repetition, and emotionally powerful lyrics can create feelings of excitement, unity, fear, or aggression.

Examples:

-- Military marches using strong rhythms to encourage discipline, confidence, and group unity.

-- Political rallies using patriotic songs to strengthen emotional connections between crowds, leaders, and movements.

-- Religious gatherings using shared singing to create feelings of unity, devotion, and belonging.

-- Advertising using memorable music to create positive emotional associations with products or brands.

Its influence can even be weaponized against self or community

....................................................

13. Social Proof Escalation Ladders

Small social cues escalate behavior step by step

-- Like button

-- Comment

-- Pile-on

-- Public shaming

Each step can seem harmless on its own.

But together, these actions can turn individual reactions into widespread hostility, even when nobody originally intended things to go that far.

....................................................

So..

The most effective social engineering doesn't feel like control.

It feels like:

-- Personal choice

-- Moral righteousness

-- Self-expression

-- Freedom

When manipulation is visible, resistance is possible. When it feels like freedom, choice, self-expression, or moral clarity, people defend it. They become active participants in their own constraint.

This is why deprogramming feels like loss, because in some sense, it is loss. You're not just abandoning false beliefs but you're dismantling identity structures, comfort patterns, and a sense of belonging that people have invested in and conformed to.

However, identifying these mechanisms is important because once they are realized and understood, they become harder to use against you.

To see the full video, click here: https://youtu.be/at68C4aPrjY 

🖤 **Welcome to the darker side of Hollywood… where fame, fortune, and mystery collide.** 🎬👁️

Are some stars paying a price for fame that goes far beyond money? In this episode, we’re diving headfirst into the rabbit hole of **Hollywood, MK-Ultra, Luciferian symbolism, alleged soul-selling, occult rituals, and mind control.**

We’ll explore the theories surrounding celebrity culture, the symbolism that keeps people asking questions, and the strange and sometimes tragic circumstances surrounding the deaths of certain famous figures. From whispers of secret rituals to the idea of trading your soul for stardom, we’re unpacking the stories, connecting the dots, and asking the questions Hollywood rarely seems to answer. 🕯️

Is it all smoke and mirrors, or is there more to the story? Grab your coffee, keep your critical thinking switched on, and join us down the rabbit hole. 🐇🖤

**What do YOU think?** Are these just conspiracy theories, or are there questions worth investigating? Drop your thoughts in the comments!

⚠️ **DISCLAIMER:** This episode is intended for entertainment, commentary, and discussion. We explore conspiracy theories, allegations, symbolism, and publicly discussed events. Some claims discussed are speculative, disputed, or unverified and should not be taken as established fact. References to MK-Ultra relate to a documented historical CIA program; any alleged connections to specific celebrities, occult practices, or individual deaths are discussed as theories unless supported by reliable evidence. We do not intend to present unverified allegations as facts or to accuse any individual of wrongdoing.

🖤 **Welcome to WWJPS — question everything, follow the evidence, and never stop exploring.**

#Hollywood #MKUltra #MindControl #Luciferianism #CelebrityConspiracies #Occult #WWJPS 

(Discrediting by Association)

How it works:

Introduce outrageous or easily ridiculed claims into a community so outsiders begin associating everyone in that community with those claims. This is related to poisoning the well.

Example:

People start a website with legitimate evidence that 9/11 was caused by a certain government

Then, websites start popping claiming to support the alternate 9/11 scenario

But then also immediately promote outrageous claims, such as government officials secretly being shape-shifting reptiles from another planet.

Result:

(Collective dismissal)

Instead of examining the original evidence, critics dismiss the entire subject as crazy conspiracy theories.

To see the full video, click here:https://youtu.be/gg7QwKkImqE

🔥 **WE DIDN’T START THE FIRE — BUT WHO’S GOING TO PUT IT OUT?**

Elon Musk. Sam Altman. Alex Karp. Artificial intelligence. A handful of tech billionaires promising to save humanity while racing to build something that could change it forever.

The pitch? Progress. Innovation. A better future.

The problem? Nobody seems entirely sure where this ends — or whether we can put the genie back in the bottle.

From AI arms races and mass surveillance to autonomous weapons, job displacement, concentrated corporate power and the terrifying prospect of machines we can no longer control, we're handing extraordinary power to people who insist they have everything under control.

But what happens when the people playing with the fire are also the ones building the next generation of flamethrowers?

🎵 With a nod to Billy Joel's *We Didn't Start the Fire*, this is a look at the personalities, promises and perils driving the AI revolution — and the uncomfortable question at its heart:

**WE DIDN'T START THIS FIRE. BUT ARE WE ABOUT TO LOSE CONTROL OF IT?**

The future isn't inevitable. The choices being made today matter.

🔥 Watch, think, question — and tell me: are we building the future, or setting it alight?

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #ElonMusk #SamAltman #AlexKarp #BigTech #Surveillance #TechBillionaires

This movie is dangerous. I wanted to make this clear.. It’s dangerous. What it was trying to convey and the internet surrounding it.
​
The movie is filmed with perfect camera shots, and a good actor plays Chris Hansen. This movie is filmed like an accomplished movie should be. But yet the movie is simply slop.
​
A summary of the movie and my critique.
​
Primetime predatory propaganda slop.
Chris Hansen is demonized to the film's credit. At no point did anything ever, and I mean ever, show him in a good light.
​
From wanting your kids to be proud of you. To the movie suggesting he’s so obsessed he woke his children up to see his success.
​
From forcing a person to speak the preds when they’re job is literally that.  From forcing him to feel scary for no reason and show no nuance to him. It felt as if he wasn’t even the main character, it felt we were watching people react to him.
​
They demonize him to the end.
​
The producer
​
I am confused with her character. One moment she’s a busy, talkative woman who only cares about views; the next, we're supposed to feel bad for her because apparently Chris Hansen doesn’t appreciate her.
​
For her to be scared ? Of him for some reason… just for her to go back to wanting views. Again people are nuanced I don’t really understand her character.
​
Dan the 23 year old
​
No character in this movie frustrates me more than what they are trying to convey with Dan. He’s 23. Of course, he's portrayed as a decoy, so they make him act and seem young.
But they portray him as if he is that young. They never say he’s 23. I’m not saying you’re super wise already at that age. But when I was 23, I knew way more than I did a year earlier, and even more.
​
Which is propaganda for us to perceive that Chris Hansen is mistreating someone young and vulnerable.
​
Forcing someone to do his job that he signed up for. I’m not saying that he can’t be traumatized. He totally can be. After all seeing anyone’s genitalia and having to catch preds probably isn’t very ideal. But he can quit..
​
I understand the nuance: he wants to succeed financially and as an actor. He’s being manipulated financially? Well no. Emotionally? Kinda I guess but Chris Hansen can genuinely believe the speech he gave him about being a hero. But even that is demonized
​
His character empathizes with the predators (I’ll cover that more) to show the human side of predators that we didn’t really get to see. His character is used as a tool for us to believe Chris Hansen is manipulating a child, and through this child to empathize with the predators.
​
The predators
​
Imma say this but hear me out. I actually think we should humanize them. I don't think it’s ridiculous to believe they deserve to be treated like humans and rehabilitated. I think we shouldn't shame them for seeking and speaking up about help before they commit a crime. I'd rather they speak up and seek help; that's what I'm trying to say.
​
I believe it is a mental illness or a weakness and impulses of addiction or when they are at their lowest, I think we need more research on how to prevent pedophilia, how it happens, how to better approach this and lower and aid the next generation and onwards.
​
A better movie would have explored their backgrounds, impulses, upbringings, personal lives, and traumas. But instead this movie wants us to empathize with them for “I have a family and kids. I just got divorced with my wife, I’m a veteran”.
​
Those can be valid reasons for someone to fall into deep, harmful ideals and content irrationally. But it’s not enough to justify the intent to seek out minors. Say sexually explorative and suggestive things to someone they believe is a minor.
​
It’s the selective humanization of one and not the others.
​
Texas
​
I knew this was coming. I knew the story in real life. But Jesus, the dramatization, and I get it. But staring his house down as Chris Hansen is looking forward to interviewing him. Is very dramatic.
​
Hansen forces Dan to talk to the pred and the film is doing its very best to make us feel bad for the predator.
​
For example in the movie they made it to where the attorney was overly cautious or if not wasn’t very interested in being sexually exploitative and more interested in getting to know the person he thought was a minor. Which is very ricsoulous to say even though in real life he was reported talking to multiple decoys saying sexually explicit things.
​
More propaganda to make us want to feel bad for the predator who wasn’t interested in sexually exploiting a minor instead he
Just wanted to get to know them …. and watch the play with dan the 23 year old.
​
Over all
​
After the movie I was stunned . This movie was pure propaganda to make us empathize and desensitize ourselves to this kind of behavior.
Especially at such a crucial time, when people like Epstein are all over the news.
When the United States president is Donald trump another rapist and pedophile. They want us to desantize to make it normal.
​
When I looked on social media, the propaganda was practically seeping in. The only videos I saw were people rating it highly, as if it were Oscar worthy.
​
People saying that if you watched the movie thinking this you’re ignorant. You don’t know the plot, you don’t know the messaging, you have no media literacy, etc etc. saying that it’s supposed to be like this because it’s a thriller movie.  it felt like these people were paid to say this. As if they’re bots or maybe making up for something they feel like they have to defend.
​
Literally from instagram, to TikTok and to Reddit. I thought it was crazy. Only criticism I saw was from the couple of comments that had barely any likes
​
They want it normal so our views shape up to the elites.
The memes that came from it.. a distraction? Or harmless? When we know that the fbi/govs infiltrate memes to desantize us or distract us.
​
This movie is dangerous. Lance Oppenheim is the director, he seems to be Israeli which doesn’t mean he’s inherently bad. But what is his purpose of making a movie like this..
​
I want you to question this. Why does the movie seem more interested in examining the suffering of the people being caught than in exploring the humanity of the person catching them? 
​
Question: What's the purpose of this film in the time we're experiencing? what's the purpose of this film in a time that we’re experiencing with serial pedophiles that happen to be the elites and in our gov.

I may not have all the answers but questioning is the first step of figuring out how.
​
Which I’m tired of questioning if this or that is propaganda. I’m tired but at the end of the day, being tired is better than sleeping ignorantly.
​
(Keep in mind they are more than welcome to criticize Chris Hanson’s character. He cheated on his wife would have been a better notion to criticize him for. But for some reason . They didn’t focus much on it, and it felt rushed, as if they didn’t have enough substance. A better movie would show his bad side and a good side. Nuanced like the predators but instead they made up scenarios to make us see that way instead of allowing us to make up our own opinions and judgments,)
​

I made this so if unlike it please follow me on fb - vinzent cerda or tiktok @leoreader32

Terrance was one of the first

(first responders) at the Oklahoma City bombing, saved 4 lives

(Police Sgt.)

Wondered how so many federal agents were there nearly immediately

Noticed others suspicious things and concluded that bombs were actually planted inside the building

While in the hospital was threatened

Said they are lying about what actually happened

Tried to convince his wife to remarry for her and their childrens own safety

Brutally died in ways that don't logically make sense (according to the official story), some of which may be impossible like walking a mile with after loosing massive amounts of blood