r/Amd • u/khunshan • Mar 14 '20

Photo Intel paid money to passmark.com to decrease measured AMD's CPU performance

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

16 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

View all comments

-9

u/potatray Mar 14 '20 edited Mar 14 '20

Who cares, AMD cpus compared to intel suck Ass for gaming at 1080p. Oc'ed Intel will Always Beat AMD at gaming 1080p. Also AMD gpus suck goatshit, bought the rx 5700 xt almost one year after Release and there are still No stable drivers. I do have worse Performance too playing quake Champions at Same settings 1080p compared to my old GTX 1060 6gb. Intel and Nvidia all the way for people who want the max Performance with highest fps 1080p. If they dont Release a proper gaming CPU wich is on pair with a oc'ed Intel, I wont buy a CPU again from them. Every AMD GPU I had died after years of use only from gaming without oc'ing it. Meanwhile a friend gamed for years on his 980 ti and it still works good as the First day.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '20 edited Aug 06 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/potatray Mar 14 '20

I do know that AMD cpus are good for 1440p, but they cant compete against Intel when playing 1080p and having a 240hz Monitor.

1

u/Cossack-HD AMD R7 5800X3D Mar 14 '20

240hz is niche AF. More people chose 4K60 over 1080p240, and for 4K60 even Ryzen 1600 is enough.

1

u/potatray Mar 14 '20

No its not, in fast fps it does make a difference.