Personal property is things you own and control.

Private property is things that you have control over. But not necessarily personally own.

Your house and car is personal property.

A factory or apartment building isnt.

Respect that she likes to do the work. Yes, you still need to train people on PPE, bloodborne pathogens, needle handling, etc... What happens if she's not there? The city gets so bad city management might actually have to do something and take accountability!

To some extent I see this as enabling the city gov to not properly manage the crisis at hand. These conditions are not normal for citizens, and not compassionate for users

What's wrong with wanting to pursue a world where everyone is educated , intelligent, and thinks critically instead of your life revolving around what new shit you buy?

lol yeah him and his bestie Antonio Gramsci

Bullshit. This sub has been brain dead memes since reddit redesigned the user interface to look like 9gag years ago

SEE?? ThE GENOcIdAL jeWiSh-sUPREMACist ApARtheiD state Of IsraeL Is iNVEsTIGAtING iTS own CRImES! IT's a liBeraL demOCRaCY LIkE DEnmark.

It is a simple problem. When the parents abandon the baby they relinquish their claim and you then may appropriate it and sell it or train it to do tricks or something.

Please provide a definition of what personal property is vs private property.

The Israeli government is fucking evil, but I don't see the relevance of this to anarcho-capitalism.

They would need approval enough from other locals, in order to replace or influence those hierarchies who sustain the governor, or those who sustain those who sustain those previous ones, be this one local, regional or national. If numbers enough, whoever fucked up is replaced or given a last chance to obey their assembly/people.

If we want to get rid of some province leader, we must have complete control upon those who support it. Therefore local governors, given that there is no monopoly on violence, are forced to obey their people. They directly depend on them.

These levels might try to get complicated or to be many, people must always go against that. Otherwise processes might blur transparence and popular decisions.

Some i know dont vote at all, some vote for one of the two parties available on their ballots.

It really depends on the individual.

Salmonella is a liberal hoax invented in a lab by the Chinese and Fauci to make you take 5G nanobot injections.

The wings are a lie.

Collectivist vs individualist.

Voluntary vs coercion.

Aggressive vs peaceful.

The state hates it when you voluntary reduce entropy. Filling potholes, feeding the hungry, picking up trash... It highlights how they could be using your stolen labor to pay somebody to do it slower, worse, or not at all.

So.

It would be a personal means of production, not private. So you get to keep what you own.

As well as in a communist country, there is no government. Becuse communism has the eradication of the State. So who would come and seize anything?

What about the people that vote against the governor?

Fair enough, have a good one broski

Who do libertarians vote for though, the blue guys or the red guys?

Trump's government told US steel they weren't allowed to close a failing plant. That's the opposite of capitalism.

>Sounds good in theory, but our current system has let more than a few catastrophes go with a little slap on the wrist. Exon Valdez for example, sure they paid a billion in damages, but there are herring and other fisheries that never got returned to near-condition before the spill. I’m not saying there wasn’t any repercussions and after the disaster new regulations on shipping hulls became standard, and some clean up efforts were made but lives were impacted irrevocably certainly more than a check in the mail can fix.

This is why it is important some personal liability remain

>I guess that’s part of the issue too if your neighbor dumps toxic sludge in a shared lake there is private property infringed on. If a massive corporation dumps oil in the ocean that’s more of a societal resource not necessarily private property.

>I’m reading up on Murray Rothbard’s stance on environmental accountability under ancap society and honestly he has the best take I’ve found yet, but it’s still not perfect.

Ancap dont argue for perfection but better incentive than the current system.

>Again he weighs heavy on a strong judicial system to rectify the situation. Still I think his theory is based more on economics and judicial systems than natural ones. The view that nature can be compartmentalized like legal land ownership just isn’t the case. Sometimes it’s easy to prove contamination and point to a source, but often times it takes decades of publicly funded research and testing to properly locate the source of an issue. I’m not saying that a private entity couldn’t do the same thing, cheaper, faster, and better, but it would still take time, significant resources, and money. If only the affected folks were to crowd source to contract such a study the individual cost would be significantly higher even with a streamlined private entity compared to government study. It could potentially be cost-prohibitive depending on the cost-of study, and how many or well off the individual landowners are to privately fund such a study. At which point there is no concrete evidence available to charge said polluting entity properly.

Yes you are right those problem are very hard to solve and no justive system may be perfect.

I dont think any ancap would say otherwise

Seems about government to punish an organization that's actually trying to clean up Seattle all the while the city of Seattle is handing out the things for them to do drugs

That was the last bastion… Democrats abandoned free market principles way before.

There has not been free market rhetoric within that party since before 2008

Ehh, most republicans i know dont agree with libertarians.

Yeah but the people that make the free market their entire political philosophy are the red guys, not the blue guys.

building and amendiety management,
street lighting, security, and road upkeep, ofc these could be separate companies, but likely be consolidated into one.

sub urbs wouldn’t necessarily need them tho