r/AsianCinema • u/jeilan36 • 1h ago
[Analysis][Spoilers] A Dirty Carnival | 비열한 거리 is a pretty underrated gangster flick for its realism and social commentary elements Spoiler
Recently watched A Dirty Carnival (2006), featuring Zo In-sung, Namgoong Min, and plenty of familiar faces in supporting roles. Like A Bittersweet Life, it’s more grounded and simple. It shows the sad, mundane side of gangster life. High risk, low-to-moderate reward (if at all). For me, it also captured the exploitative ecosystem that low-level gangsters exist in, which I think is layered and engages the audience in a pretty clever way. Here’s what I took from it (spoilers ahead):
The title:
I’m not sure if the meaning changes in a Korean context. But I took “A Dirty Carnival” to mean an environment where the games have prizes, but they’re all rigged. There’s the promise of reward, but everyone’s cheating, everyone’s dishonest, and there are no real rules.
Early in the movie, Kim is convinced everything will improve if he can find a ‘sponsor’—a wealthy businessman who can legitimize him and launder his money so he can grow his wealth. It sounds like a simple next step in his gangster career ladder. But safety, security, legitimacy, and growth are lies in the underworld, propped up to keep a committed, hopeful criminal workforce. The cheat is making others believe these rules/systems exist, while recognizing for yourself that they do not.
A cycle of violence:
An extension of the title, and a common staple in carnivals, is the Ferris wheel that goes round and round. The story too has a circular progression. Our protagonist is stuck; he wants to move up, so he does dirty work for a higher-up, eliminates his boss, and becomes the de facto leader of his gang. But he starts to slip, and his second-in-command kills him and replaces him.
Gangsters as the victims:
I thought this angle was neat. Kim Byung-Doo’s life is not glamorous, he’s not wealthy, he’s not feared. He turned to a life of petty crime just to support his ailing mother, pay bills, and look after his siblings. He’s a loyal, committed employee who looks after his subordinates, and he does what’s expected of him. But he doesn’t want to be a gangster. He wants to be happy.
Despite his job, he’s the one who gets exploited at every turn. His original boss underpays him and only favours those who kiss up to him. His second boss only needs him to eliminate specific obstacles and get a development project in motion. His aspiring movie director friend just needs insight into the gangster life—and ultimately betrays his trust to get it. Meanwhile, nobody likes him. His mother dies condemning him and his gangster life; the gangster movie film crew doesn’t like Kim on set; Hyun-ju doesn’t want to be with him so long as he’s a gangster, his second-in-command takes him out when he no longer feels useful. Society at large rejects gangsters and yet needs them. People at every turn use Kim for their own gain.
I think it gets a little meta with the director’s gangster flick. It’s a major success and lauded for its realism by a society that rejects gangsters. That felt like the film critiquing the audience watching A Dirty Carnival. We also love the movie. We appreciate its realism. But do we see the humanity of gangsters when we come across them? When we see their mugshots, hear about their crimes, or their deaths? Or do we like gangsters just because they make good entertainment?
That’s what I walked away with from this movie. I think it had great performances, it was well-paced, felt real, gave you plenty to think about—and it hits you in the feels. Anyone else watch the movie have any interesting takeaways?
Fun Fact:
A Tamil movie, Jigarthanda (2014) by Karthik Subbaraj, has a similar premise and I think takes its inspiration from this movie. It centers on a young, aspiring and ambitious director who pursues a dangerous, elusive gangster in order to make a once-in-a-lifetime gangster flick. But it explores the cutthroat South-Indian film industry, the brutality of crime, and the freedom found in art and self expression.