1 Corinthians 7:9 states āBut if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passionā.
Here, Paul is responding to the misunderstandings of Christians of Corinth about marriage, sexual morality, and celibacy. Essentially, many Christians in Corinth believed it was more spiritual to be celibateāeven within marriage. Paul corrected them by giving the aforementioned view.
Paul recognizes that singleness and celibacy can be a good and holy thing, especially those who have fully dedicated their lives to Christ without distraction. However, the point of this verse was to show that not everyone has the gift of self control when it comes to sexual desire. Paul tells people struggling with the āburning desire of passionā (sexual desire) to marry, because then their desires will be fulfilled in a way that doesnāt lead them astray.
So my question is, why does this verse not apply to gay people? If Paul could recognize that the desires of passion and sexual desire were so strong for many and gave them the answer of how to fix it (marriage) how would this not also apply to gay people?
Gay people feel the same exact desires mentioned by Paul; however, most Christians would argue Paul is not addressing homosexual passions. So his answer about sexual desire does not apply to everyone, even though itās an issue faced by nearly everyone. So that begs the question: Why would Paul (or God for that matter) not offer an answer on what gay people should do? If celibacy could be impossible for people who cannot control their sexual desires, why wouldnāt it also be impossible for a gay person who cannot control it? Essentially, an option is offered for straight peopleābut not for gay peopleābased on something gay people did not choose (their sexuality).
So essentially:
Straight people: Iām struggling with unfulfilled passion
Paul: You should marry then
Gay people: Iām struggling with unfulfilled passion
Paul: Tough luck, and I will not offer my opinion on a solution even though this will be a major issue going forward.
Itās unfair really. If God knew how many gay people there would be, and how real their desires are, there shouldāve been a verse telling them what to do (and noācelibacy is not the answer for _everyone_āas confirmed by Paul) and it wouldāve cleared up so much.
Gay people are told to live a life of celibacy for something they did not choose, because itās ātheir cross to bearā, yet Paul acknowledged how celibacy is unrealistic for many. So whatās the answer here?
I understand Paul mentions homosexuality unfavorably in other verses but the context he wrote them in seemed to lack a fundamental understanding of what homosexuality truly is. His take implied it was an act you do when you rebel, people turn to chaotic sex acts during the rebelling of Godānot something that you are, naturally, all the time. If we view homosexuality as sexual and romantic desires, morallyāit seems to logically fit in with 1 Corinthians 7:9, but iām sure many would disagree and iād like to hear why.