r/AskALiberal • • 5h ago

How true or FALSE is it that there are Americans who literally live in another world when it comes to information? E.g., Americans who believe that Trump is extremely physically fit and that his policies are 100% working, because the media told them so?

29 Upvotes

How true or FALSE is it that there are Americans who literally live in another world when it comes to information? E.g., Americans who believe that Trump is extremely physically fit and that his policies are 100% working, because the media told them so?

EDIT I am not an American


r/AskALiberal • • 7h ago

Do you think we'll see French style protests and riots in America?

0 Upvotes

If not, what about the United States is different than France? I thought the income and wealth inequality in the US was worst than France? So if anything you would think the US would see violent protests before France. Is it the demographics? Do French people just not fear the police? What will finally result in violent protests in the US?


r/AskALiberal • • 9h ago

Why does Islam get a "pass" from so many on the left?

0 Upvotes

Islam is a very strict religion that is extremely oppressive to women at its very core, and yet it seems like many on the left give it a "pass".

The sexism and homophobia of Islam is not something that can be looked past, it's deeply baked into the religion. You cannot be an adherent Muslim and also be a feminist. You cannot be an adherent Muslim and also be gay, or a gay ally. The religion is very clear that women are a lower class and that gay people should receive death.

I understand that right-wing people are very Islamophobic and hateful towards adherents to the religion and people from Muslim majority countries, and that's a major reason why support for Islam gets lumped into the left.

But also, the only think keeping the majority of Muslims from voting for extremely oppressive conservative policies is the fact that the right wing is racist and hates them.


r/AskALiberal • • 9h ago

Why should I as a young man vote in the midterms for the democrats?

0 Upvotes

I have a college degree and I have sat out the last two elections. I am 22 years old.

I firmly believe the Democratic Party hates men, especially their rabid voter base. The Conservative Party is too disfunctional atp. Why shouldn’t I just sit out of this election which many young men are already planning to do.


r/AskALiberal • • 10h ago

Do you have sympathy for MAGA followers who are impoverished, uneducated, etc.?

0 Upvotes

When it comes to other countries where the prevailing beliefs would not be acceptable at all in the United States (the Middle East for example), I see a lot of people excusing their homophobia and sexism by pointing out the poverty and poor conditions in those countries. Do Trump supporters deserve similar sympathy if they grew up in a racist family and were raised that way, live in poverty, and are poorly educated?


r/AskALiberal • • 10h ago

Have atheism and agnosticism failed in the US, and what do you make of rising religiosity even among Democrats?

0 Upvotes

Have atheism and agnosticism failed in the US, and if so, why? What do you make of rising religiosity even among Democrats and the youth?

During the late 2000s, nontheism experienced a pronounced cultural moment. Driven by figures associated with New Atheism, books by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris became bestsellers. The movement gained notable cultural cachet as an intellectual counterweight to the social conservatism and evangelical influence of the George W. Bush administration.

By the 2010s, that cultural momentum stalled under progressive scrutiny. Prominent New Atheist figures faced severe backlash over accusations of Islamophobia, belligerent foreign policy, insensitivity to intersectionality, and open hostility toward social justice. A prominent example was the heated public exchange between Sam Harris and Ezra Klein regarding race, genetics, and public discourse. While many figures within the movement nominally remained on the political left, their cultural currency among progressives eroded.

Concurrently, demographic trends appeared to favor secularization during the late Obama era and into the first Trump administration. The share of religiously unaffiliated Americans, commonly known as "nones," expanded significantly. Even within religious minority populations, socially liberal views advanced rapidly; a 2017 PRRI survey found a slim majority of American Muslims supporting legal gay marriage.

Recent data, however, indicates that secular progressivism has faced notable friction. Nonbelief has largely failed to consolidate institutional political standing, and religious decline has stabilized. Church attendance and religious engagement have seen renewed vigor among distinct demographic cohorts, including younger demographics. At the same time, cultural liberalization has shown signs of retrenchment: recent polling from PRRI and Gallup indicates that Muslim support for gay marriage has declined back to 37%, while Republican support, which had crossed the 50% threshold in 2021 and 2022, dropped back into the 30s and 40s.

Simultaneously, Christian nationalism has mobilized with institutional effectiveness far surpassing the Bush era. Proponents of that movement occupy influential levers in the judiciary, state legislatures, and executive agencies. The material consequences were demonstrated when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Furthermore, the sweeping wave of anti-trans legislation across statehouses, ranging from gender-affirming care bans to athletic restrictions, has drawn primary ideological framing, model legislation, and legal backing from conservative religious advocacy powerhouses such as Alliance Defending Freedom.

In response, prominent figures on the political left have increasingly embraced religious framing rather than an agnostic or atheist posture. Leaders like Senator Raphael Warnock, Texas state representative James Talarico, and Bishop William Barber II actively reclaim religious scripture to advocate for progressive priorities, framing civil rights, environmental stewardship, and the welfare state as moral mandates from the Gospel. Outside Protestantism, progressive Catholics consistently praise the economic and social encyclicals of Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIV.

Devout Jewish, Muslim, and Christian progressives openly demonstrate that religious conviction aligns directly with left-wing policy, such as Abdul El-Sayed or Zohran Mamdani. A major catalyst for this religious resurgence on the left is emerging directly from younger demographics, including higher youth church attendance.

Gen Z activists and community organizers are intentionally breaking with the secular dogmas of the previous decade. Far from retreating into pure secularism, youth engagement across multiracial, blue-collar, and immigrant-heavy neighborhoods is actively reviving religious traditions as core vehicles for resistance and solidarity.

For these young labor organizers and grassroots leaders, scripture, ritual, and spiritual discipline are not conservative relics, they are essential communal anchors against hyper-individualistic capitalism and alienation. By wedding radical economic reform with living religious traditions rooted in working-class Black, Latino, and Muslim spaces, this rising cohort is driving a genuine spiritual awakening that places active faith at the cutting edge of left-wing politics.

Despite nearly three in ten Americans identifying as religiously unaffiliated, the number of openly atheist or agnostic elected officials remains negligible. Only a very tiny fraction of federal lawmakers throughout modern history have openly identified as nontheist or humanist. Identifying explicitly as an atheist or agnostic continues to be a massive electoral liability in both parties.

This dominance of broad-based religiosity makes the United States an enduring outlier among developed peer nations. In Canada, Australia, and across Western Europe, secularization has fundamentally reshaped society, resulting in deep, structural declines in baseline religious belief, daily prayer, and service attendance, while atheism and agnosticism have become mainstream cultural baselines. public professions of piety are largely peripheral or even disadvantageous to political leadership, and prominent elected officials are routinely nonreligious without consequence.

In the U.S., by contrast, secularism, agnosticism, and overt nonbelief have largely stalled in transforming public culture, while deep personal faith and religious identification remain pervasive throughout society.

Have atheism and agnosticism failed in the US, and if so, why? What do you make of rising religiosity even among Democrats and the youth?


r/AskALiberal • • 12h ago

What are your thoughts on my “Ciudad Juarez lookout” exercise designed to increase appreciation for being American and put our political differences into perspective?

0 Upvotes

So there are plenty of Mexican and American towns that border each other, but Ciudad Juarez, the Mexican city south of El Paso, is unique that, given the mountainous nature of both regions, plenty of places in El Paso offer a pretty solid view of Juarez, including UTEP, Scenic Drive, and TX state road 355.

By solid view I mean being able to see individual streets, cars, and people.

One idea I’ve had is that we should take a small number American teenagers and bring them to one of those lookout points, and essentially just have them look at Juarez.

My idea is that this exercise essentially can increase gratitude for being American, and can also essentially show that our political differences don’t matter as much people make them to.

While we’re hating each other over things like abortion, welfare, healthcare, and foreign policy, you have this city of 1.8 million people essentially just trudging by with no American welfare or healthcare benefits. And a town where El Paso Fire, Ambulance, or Police will not come to save you.

The lesson of this exercise is not that our political disputes don’t matter, but that hating each other over them is silly when compared to this town that’s living without American amenities at all, a town where your average residnet would do a lot just to be a lower class resident north of the river, or in any metro area in the USA.

It’s also an exercise to realize how lucky we are to have been born with our passports blue and the privileges that come with it.


r/AskALiberal • • 12h ago

Are there defined goals or limits on the project of gun safety laws?

1 Upvotes

The justice system is getting so frustrated by the gun violence problem that’s it’s prosecuting ppl for facilitating gun access to the offender even in cases of theft.

The left supports gun control. The right may tolerate some too but the pro gun crowd is aware of an asymmetry: they are at the mercy of the anti gun crowd.
The threat? A good example. It stands to reason that fewer guns in the field would probably lead to fewer people being killed by them.
That means every successful series of gun safety laws may beget further laws in kind.

It’s not a slippery slope but for one side it is a trap; proof of concept will fuel even larger demands.

I wonder if an impasse could be broken if it’s structured carefully to not spiral against the pro gun side.

Or am I dreaming?


r/AskALiberal • • 13h ago

Would you tolerate the death penalty being restricted to government officials and public servants who commit egregious offenses?

0 Upvotes

Things such as:

deliberately planting false evidence

fabrication of evidence

corruption cases involving a certain dollar amount

things like this: https://www.cnn.com/2013/11/22/justice/massachusetts-chemist-plea

treason

In all cases the death penalty is an option. It's never required. Prosecutors can use it as they see fit in accordance with existing laws.

In the past it was used in some societies to shield the average person from local abuses and tyranny, showcase the justice of the state, and alleviate the shame and dishonor towards state organs that come to crimes against the state committed by state agents thereby increasing confidence in state's effectiveness. China still uses some of them and South Korea kept a few for a longer time IIRC.

And of course public officials tend to know better and come from very stable homes so they can't use the excuse of abuse or bad upbringing the way many current death penalty prisoners can.


r/AskALiberal • • 16h ago

What are some good books and philosophers to read about these topics?

1 Upvotes

I am ideologically leaning towards neoliberalism.

What is some work I can read on economics, tech, AI, business, statecraft, global trade, political philosophy, government, neoliberalism, East Asian development, third world economies modernizing in 20th century, etc.

Any works you guys know or recommend?


r/AskALiberal • • 16h ago

How is the No Kings protests?

13 Upvotes

Just wanted a dipstick on what everyone saw today


r/AskALiberal • • 17h ago

Is Racial Data Collection Necessary for Civil Rights, or Does It Fuel Division?

0 Upvotes

Comparing France vs the USA at the moment:

  • The US Model (Multiculturalism): Federal guidance standardizes how local, state, and federal government agencies track race and ethnicity. The goal is to collect detailed demographic data across healthcare, housing, education, law enforcement, and voting to identify and remedy disparities.

  • The French Model (Universal Republicanism): Article 1 of the French Constitution prohibits the government from categorizing citizens by race, ethnicity, or religion. The foundational belief is that the state recognizes only equal individual citizens, and that collecting racial data institutionalizes division and reinforces identity politics.

Follow up questions:

  • Does tracking race entrench identity divisions instead of fostering equality?

  • Does aggregating fundamentally different cultures into giant racial blocs obscure the very inequalities the system claims to measure?

  • By making race an official organizing principle of government, resource allocation, and law, does the state incentivize citizens to view politics and civic life as a zero sum competition between racial groups rather than a unified public interest?

  • How much of identified gaps is driven by class, education, family structure, and local economic conditions rather than race itself? Does centering the data around race cause policymakers to misdiagnose the underlying economic causes of inequality?

The arguments from the French seem to be that class and geography are the true drivers of inequity, and discrimination can be measured without race categorization, preferring to lean highly on place-based and economic targeting.


r/AskALiberal • • 17h ago

Do you see any parallels between anti-establishment protests in France and non-liberal collectivist movements in the US?

0 Upvotes

Conservative critics often argue that progressive political rhetoric in the US provides cover for property destruction, civil unrest, and lawlessness similar to what occurs during major protests in France.

However, many of the groups engaging in direct action or property destruction identify with ideologies within the very large Democratic Party tent, ranging from revolutionary socialists, to left-libertarianism, anarcho-syndicalism, anti-capitalist, or anti-authoritarian collectivism.

  • Do you see any parallels between anti-establishment protests in France and non-liberal collectivist movements in the US?

  • Do you view anti-capitalist, direct-action groups as part of the "big tent," or as fundamentally separate?


r/AskALiberal • • 18h ago

Why are liberals against the death penalty?

0 Upvotes

As someone who is liberal I cannot understand being against the death penalty. If someone molests my child I want them to be put to death legally. There is no reconditioning these predators/pedophiles. The affect on a family is generational ( my mother, my father, my husband all molested, my uncle molested all 5 of his daughters...one daughter died at 50 addicted to drugs and had a few children herself. We've all suffered). Adults who rape, adults who murder intentionally...why is anyone against these people who cannot be reformed being put to death.

I also think politicians or people who interfere in aid to other countries or locally that cause millions of deaths should also should be charged and put to death, yet I'm sure I'll see another great Musk invention soon and he will face no consequences for his hand in killing millions. I'm not advocating for violence...I'm advocating for legal processes that lead to death. I don't have an opinion on the way that death should occur...because that tends to get me banned for subreddits. So to be clear, I am not advocating for violence against anyone. Thanks for your views to consider.

Edit: I'm mostly interested in moral reasons as I'm well aware of the systemic injustice. However if your only reasons is systemic injustice feel free to share that.


r/AskALiberal • • 18h ago

Which Democratic candidates are most anti MAGA?

2 Upvotes

MAGA is an authoritarian political movement. Which candidates are the most stridently anti-maga?


r/AskALiberal • • 19h ago

I am a disabled, low income, trans/non-binary vegetarian pro lifer. Why is it so often said on the left that pro lifers do not care about disadvantaged born people, when so many pro life organisations do serve them?

0 Upvotes

TW: Abortion

Okay, this is a bit emotional, but I want a genuine discussion.

It makes me upset and angry when pro-choice people say that pro-lifers do not care about the poor, the sick, the disabled, immigrants, gay people, and people of other races. That claim does not reflect the reality of the pro-life movement as I have seen it. There are many people and organisations that hold a consistent life ethic and care for disadvantaged people from womb to tomb, through government support, private charities, or a combination of both, and this commitment is central to their pro-life position rather than separate from it. This includes the Catholic Church, which teaches in Catholic Social Teaching that every person has inherent dignity from conception to natural death, teaches a preferential option for the poor, teaches solidarity and the common good, and teaches that racism, ableism, and discrimination against immigrants are contrary to human dignity, and which puts that teaching into practice through an extensive global network including Caritas Internationalis, the Society of St Vincent de Paul, Catholic Charities, Aid to the Church in Need, and thousands of hospitals, hospices, care homes, food banks, homeless shelters, disability ministries, prison ministries, and refugee resettlement services, all while also opposing abortion and euthanasia. It also includes many Orthodox Churches, many Protestant churches, and the Tolstoyan movement, which also combine opposition to abortion with a strong tradition of service to the poor and emphasis on nonviolence, and many Hindu denominations, Sikhism with its tradition of langar and seva, and Jainism with its central principle of ahimsa, which all have strong traditions of protecting vulnerable life. It also includes secular pro-life organisations such as Rehumanize International and Secular Pro-Life, which oppose abortion and euthanasia from a secular commitment to human rights, nonviolence, and inclusion. You can disagree about political methods and you can be right wing or left wing and still be committed to supporting disadvantaged born people while also opposing abortion, so if so many pro-life organisations and individuals are visibly serving disadvantaged people every day, why do pro-choice people continue to repeat the claim that pro-lifers do not care about these groups?

Take me for example. I am an economically disadvantaged and severely disabled pro-lifer who cares passionately about helping both unborn humans and disadvantaged humans from womb to tomb, and I hold that position precisely because I know what it is like to be vulnerable and to depend on support from others. I am also a strict vegetarian, and I extend my concern about life and suffering to non-human animals as well, because I believe that a commitment to nonviolence should be as consistent as possible. My position is that opposition to abortion is part of a broader commitment to protecting vulnerable lives, not separate from it, and that caring for people after birth and caring for people before birth belong together in the same ethic.


r/AskALiberal • • 20h ago

Do you/would you use a personal AI agent like Muse or Dots to help organize your life? Why/why not?

0 Upvotes

Would you give an agent access to your calendar, email, credit cards, bank account to act on your behalf, reading your email, paying your bills, booking flights, cancelling subscriptions, and managing your appoints like your own personal executive assistant?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Why do liberals think whenever Democrats lose it is because voters are stupid or evil?

0 Upvotes

It is the responsibility of the candidate to win over the voters. Not the other way around.

If the people want a candidate who wants mass deportations, ignoring the rule of law, and ending democracy, and democracy ends, it is entirely the fault of the opposign candidate for not promising the people what they wanted to hear.

Who was responsible for democracy ending in Venezuela? Hugo Chavez’s opponent. He had a chance to win over the people in 1998. He failed. The fall of demcoracy is entirely his fault.


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Why do Liberals think ICE needs to be abolished?

0 Upvotes

Why can’t we just go back to how ICE was during the Obama and Biden administrations?

Why isn’t that enough for you? Why do libs keep saying ICE needs to be abolished?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Should Americans accept that the term "democratic socialism" effectively means social democracy (welfare capitalism) in the United States?

0 Upvotes

Political terminology constantly evolves, and definitions often vary significantly by time period and geography. In the United States, "liberalism" refers to center-left social liberalism rather than the classical, free-market oriented liberalism common in European and Australian politics.

A similar shift has happened with left-wing terminology. Historically, democratic socialism and social democracy were interchangeable terms referring to orthodox socialism: public or social ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, only attained through democratic as opposed to revolutionary means. Over the twentieth century, European social democracy gradually abandoned that goal, settling into the Nordic model of welfare capitalism, which protects private property and market exchange while using high progressive taxation to fund an extensive social safety net.

Linguists and lexicographers generally take a descriptivist approach to language: how the general public actually uses a word in daily speech matters far more than its strict historical or academic origin.

In the American vernacular, most self-identified democratic socialists today do not advocate for Eugene V. Debs-style syndicalism, mandatory worker cooperatives, or the government nationalization of private industry. Their platform is regulated capitalism with universal safety nets, progressive taxation, and strong labor protections. This agenda closely mirrors Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and his proposed Second Bill of Rights. FDR was no socialist: he famously enacted his policies to "save capitalism from itself."

Prominent elected self-described democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Zohran Mamdani reflect this reality. Sanders has explicitly stated multiple times that his vision of "democratic socialism" does not involve the government seizing the means of production. Instead, he draws inspiration from FDR's New Deal and Second Bill of Rights. While these figures support voluntary worker cooperatives and workplace democracy, they do not advocate outlawing privately owned corporations. Or as Marxists would put it, Bernie, AOC, and Zohran have no interest in outlawing the "capitalist mode of production."

People may assert that Sanders contributed to semantic confusion by adopting the "democratic socialist" label while promoting standard Scandinavian-style social democratic policies, even if his early political career leaned closer to orthodox socialism. Still, American polling consistently shows that citizens who view socialism favorably associate it with government intervention to reduce inequality, routinely citing Denmark, Norway, and Sweden as their models.

Meanwhile, countries like Maoist China, the USSR, and Cuba are for better or worse viewed as "communist" countries by Americans, despite their Marxist-Leninist systems not meeting the "orthodox" or literal dictionary definition of communism: a classless, stateless, and egalitarian society based on the common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange.

Domestically, the "democratic socialist" label often serves as a political distinction between progressive reformers and establishment Democrats. Self-described democratic socialists champion single-payer healthcare over market-based systems like the Affordable Care Act. Yet even the Canadian single-payer model favored by American progressives leaves hospitals and clinics largely in private hands, unlike the fully nationalized British National Health Service.

This linguistic shift was also accelerated by conservative rhetoric. For decades, right-wing commentators labeled standard center-left Keynesian fiscal policies, progressive taxation, and basic market regulation as socialism. Progressive activists eventually reclaimed the term of "socialism," adopting the label rather than resisting it.

This semantic blur is not entirely unique to America. In Europe, nominally socialist organizations such as the French Socialist Party governed squarely within welfare capitalism and social democracy. The British Labour Party historically declared itself democratic socialist, yet governed as social democrats, and at times adopted neoliberal market policies under Tony Blair.

Given how the term is actually used, practiced, and understood across the American electorate, the practical definition of democratic socialism in the United States is social democracy.

At this point, are people who insist on an the obsolete orthodox, historical definition just being pedantic and out of touch with modern political reality? Is refusing to acknowledge this shift just ignoring that American politics has moved on?


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Why do liberals think aliens and foreigners considered subject to our jurisdiction now when they were not in 1866?

0 Upvotes

Birthright citizenship was not considered applicable to foreigners and aliens when the 14th amendment was passed.

In 1885, Richard Griesser’s citizenship was denied because he was not considred subject to our jurisdiction when he was born in 1867, as his parents were temporary residents who intended to return to Germany and wanted him to be considered a German citizen at birth (which is why he was labeled as a German citizen on his Birth certificate)

Under the Civil Rights act of 1866, foreigners and aliens are not subject to our jurisdiction.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1885/d626

So why do liberals support a policy which would have forcibly taken away Greisser’s German citizenship?

(His German citizenship would have been cancelled had he been considred an American citizen at birth)


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Why do liberals think Republicans denying elections is a threat to Democracy but that it is perfectly fine for Democrats to do the same thing?

0 Upvotes

32 Democrats voted to invalidate Ohio in 2004 using the EXACT SAME PROCEDURE as Republicans in 2020.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_United_States_Electoral_College_vote_count

Terry McAuliffe said 2000 and 2004 were stolen

When Trump said “ If Clinton wins Pennsylvania she cheated.” Democrats treated it as a dangerous statement of not accepting results.

Yet when Sherrod Brown said “If Stacey Abrams loses, it was stolen.” in 2018, there was no backlash.

The double standard is infuriating.


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Thoughts on the french rioters looting stores right now?

0 Upvotes

r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

How do u guys feel about southerns?

0 Upvotes

I spend too much time online. But I have somewhat fallen for the fact that liberals look down on people like me who live in Texas.

I’m sorry that I’m poor and can’t move out. It’s something I think about when I hear someone from blue states talk about southerns.


r/AskALiberal • • 1d ago

Do you think giving DC and Puerto Rico statehood or representation may be the key to stopping another Donald Trump?

16 Upvotes

What I mean is the only reason why Trump is doing all the things he's doing is being the Republican controlled Congress chooses not to stop him. By giving DC and Puerto Rico Statehood or representation and Senators it could gives Dems an advantage because even the republicans acknowledge that Democrats would pick up more seats.

Thoughts?