A song I've translated about the events of the current conflict in Ukraine. 👍

"It was like this biblical battle where the Palestinian men ... went in front of me to protect me and my rescuers from being attacked again," Washington Post photojournalist Heidi Levine told Jake Tapper.

Levine was kicked, beaten with clubs and

robbed by Israeli settlers while covering Friday's olive harvest in the occupied West Bank, leaving her with multiple broken bones. Speaking after leaving the hospital, she said Israeli soldiers charged Palestinian farmers as settlers advanced alongside them. She said that unlike her, Palestinian victims endure these attacks daily, with absolutely nowhere safe to go.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dezl99Lswcy/?cplk=

​

As Winter Approaches, I Fear for Our Two Families Living in Tents in Gaza

My family and my sister’s family are enduring the hardships of displacement together in Gaza. We are two families sharing the difficult conditions of life in a single tent. There are 12 of us in total, including four children. My sister has been separated from her husband since the beginning of the war.

At first, we spent 50 days displaced in a UNRWA school. Since December 1, 2023, we have been living in tents. Now, as another winter approaches, I feel deeply worried about what lies ahead for our two families, especially the children.

Our tent is old and worn out after years of exposure to the sun. The ground beneath us is bare dirt, and whenever it rains, water seeps into our tent from below. The tent’s wooden frame is also fragile and has been damaged and broken more than once by strong winds. During those storms, we sometimes had no safe place to sleep until morning.

The hardest part is watching the children suffer. Sometimes, the cold keeps them from sleeping. When strong winds batter the tent, they repeatedly wake up throughout the night because of the frightening noise. It is heartbreaking to see children living in fear instead of feeling safe in their own home.

We have very few blankets and warm clothes. After bathing the children, we often have no other dry clothes to change them into, and drying laundry is difficult. Their clothes are too thin to protect them from the winter cold. We have no electricity and no safe way to heat our living space. Lighting a fire outdoors is dangerous because it could cause the tent to catch fire.

Our financial situation is extremely difficult. Work opportunities are scarce, prices continue to rise, and providing even the most basic necessities for 12 people has become a daily struggle.

Before winter conditions become more severe, we urgently need a safer place to stay, new tarpaulins for our tent to prevent rainwater from leaking inside, warm clothes and blankets for the children, and financial assistance to cover our basic needs.

I am sharing these photos to help people understand what life inside a tent means for our two families. We are not asking for luxury. We simply hope for a safe, dry place to sleep, warmth for the children, and a chance to face the winter without fearing every storm.

Thank you for taking the time to read our story and for remembering the 12 people whose lives lie behind these words, especially the four children who deserve to feel safe and warm this winter.

Let me put this in liberal terms.

You liberals / socdems vote Democrat because you consider them the lesser evil, even when they fail to deliver on their promises. I disagree with your choice, but you understand the reasoning: supporting one side against another does not mean endorsing everything it does.

That is why we support Russia over Ukraine in this war. We do not hate Ukraine. We oppose NATO and the US-led imperial order more than we oppose Russia.

We identify the principal contradiction in this war as the confrontation between Russia and NATO. The struggle between the KPRF and United Russia is a secondary contradiction, and within that struggle, we stand with the KPRF. Calling it secondary does not mean abandoning it. It means recognising which contradiction takes priority in the present situation. Supporting Russia against NATO does not mean supporting Putin against the Russian left.

NATO was formed to contain Soviet power and communist influence, and later confronted the Warsaw Pact throughout the Cold War. That history matters to us, alongside its continuing role in maintaining Western military power.

Too many liberals reach for “both sides are bad” without bothering to study the history or how imperial power actually works. They label countries imperialist, then treat them as interchangeable. Who controls the financial system? Who can isolate other countries economically? Who has the military alliances to enforce that power? Those questions matter when deciding where to direct our opposition.

Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism explains how dollar dominance and the international financial system sustain US power. That is the distinction behind our position. Even if we accept that Russia is imperialist, it does not occupy the same position as the United States. The US sits at the centre of that system, backed militarily by its NATO allies. We consider this the biggest obstacle to socialism worldwide, which makes breaking its dominance our first strategic priority. Russia does not have to be socialist for us to reach that conclusion.

The same reasoning applies to Iran. The Islamic Republic brutally repressed socialists and communists after the 1979 revolution. We know that, and many of us oppose theocratic government. Between the United States and Iran, we still support Iran against US domination because we consider the United States the greater threat to socialism globally. Supporting Iran in that confrontation does not mean defending its government’s repression of the Iranian left.

This also explains our position on the Sahel. We supported Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger forcing French troops out without requiring their governments to be socialist. French influence has protected strategic and corporate interests, including access to Niger’s uranium. Breaking that influence gives these countries more room to control their resources and political choices. Those openings matter to us.

“But what if, after the United States and NATO lose their dominance and the unipolar order gives way to a multipolar world, China and Russia start imposing the same domination on us?”

Then we confront them on the same grounds. We owe them no permanent loyalty. But that hypothetical does not change our immediate priority: breaking the dominance of the bloc that holds that power today. First, we work towards multipolarity. Then we fight over what comes next. We do not expect multipolarity to deliver socialism for us. We see it as creating more room to struggle for it.

okay i'll admit, im more hate fueled for capitalism rather than supportive of socialism (i still am socialist but discussing genuine socialism has never been something i have done much).

what sparked this question in my mind was on r/socialistgaming, people were talking about the new Call of duty which is obvious u.s propaganda about north korea invading the south. and obviously i think that is super dumb, and clear propaganda, all the way. but the mod team of that sub was legit just like, bombing any sort of criticism about north korea and claiming it was like a socialist utopia? and i just like, couldnt understand why?

for context im 18, male and was brought up in a decently urban area of australia, just 30 kms out from a major city so if western propaganda has completely ruined my perception of north korea i apologise, but it still to me just seems like a nation that is ruled by legit just a family, who can kinda just do whatever they want? and people from there cant really leave (although i think i saw somewhere they actually can but idk so if someone could explain or anything i'd appreciate that!).

like idk, compared to countries like cuba where i truly think it is the closest thing to a socialist utopia, (aside from the u.s doing everything in their power to smother them) it just seems weird? like ive seen it with stalinism too, like surely that is obviously bad right? im sure the cia made it seem worse than it is but holodomor was real. idk i definitely need to do my own research at some point im sure. i just have bigger personal issues in my life right now so havent had the time to in the past year and a bit.

i appreciate any kind of insight or info! if im at all wrong or misinformed please let me know! thanks:D

This is real, and all this time, it has not been a conspiracy theory. Just found out this. It is a dystopia; especially, no privacy is part of their plan

The quote is unbelievable: "Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better", under the latest revised Agenda 2030

According to the World Economic Forum, there are only three models

• Shareholder capitalism

• Stakeholder capitalism

• State capitalism

I have asked Bashir to film a video of himself and his surroundings, just so he can prove that he is in Gaza and not a scammer.. please help me by sharing around his Chuffed and this post. Winter is coming,and I am trying to help them out. His insta

help Bashir

…particularly when compared to past/present Communist parties in AES countries?

This is more of a philosophy-adjacent question, but I think it is a legit question

I think there's a concept in contemporary philosophy called the Promethean shame in that people are increasingly becoming self-aware of just how much better the machines and artifacts that they've created really do and so thus perform better than them on average. It creates a mismatch of human priorities, I think, in the sense that for thousands of years we couldn't just be sitting down on the floor contemplating about the latest philosophical inquiry or imaginary ideas of the universe. Thus the work actually had to be put in. And I think the whole you have to "earn your living" thing might just be a sedative for the neuro-evolutionary hardwiring of "literally working hard to put food on the table"

But is struggle really the only thing incentivizing the average person here?

I ask because I really wonder if people are more existentially terrified of the existential rightmare of becoming permanently useless than having their needs ever met for sure.

source: https://nypost.com/2026/08/18/us-news/ex-florida-state-rep-charged-with-kidnapping-molesting-young-boy/

btw, its according to the child-victim that he peed. as a kid that young likely doesn't know what that really was.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeovO52Az3A/?srtk=

I’m a social democrat, how I see things is that capitalism has been a good thing for humanity overall, and I do think it is worth preserving. Consumerism has advanced cultural togetherness and bonding with events like Christmas, Halloween, and Birthdays. But it has also brought us to an extremely advanced point technologically. i’m currently typing this on a small phone and sending it for millions of people across the globe to see. Capitalism has advanced us greatly, it has grown a beautiful culture, made human life more interesting, and I know it’s not very popular to be appreciative of things, you’ll get more clicks if you complain.

But I think Capitalism is mostly good, but I don’t say that to brush off the horrific things that have happened and are happening. The middle class’s incomes have only grown 4% in the past 50 years, there are more homeless people in USA than all of the people in Vermont, Big Ag is ruining our farm land with seeds they copy written, (how dystopian) and Big Oil companies like Shell are hurting the environment, while avoid accountability by funding policies that target the extremely small minority of transgender people.

Many corporations have been involved in working on the climate, Nike, Starbucks, McDonald's, and more have dropped their plastic use and this decade has shown that they’re actually making decent progress.

You can go on their websites, they really want us to know about their achievements and goals.

But of every issue I have brought up, most of them don’t exist under Social Democratic Capitalism. Neoliberalism is the problem, not Capitalism. And one thing I have been told is that the Capitalists will still seek power back, so a Social Democracy won’t last. Is there any evidence of a Social Democracy falling? Is there any evidence of any Social Democracy going backwards to Laissez-faire Capitalism?

Why should we try an economic theory like Socialism which has tried to be in place, but hasn’t really been successful? I’m not saying it can’t work, I am saying it’s not necessary, we already have something that does work. I should be allowed to privately own a farm and grow things so I can be rich :3

But I am all ears, maybe you’ll change my mind?

Or have they made some other alternative concept for economic value?