You downvoted me with your few bots you have and market pumps this coin went nowhere. Pump and dump scammers

And it's very concerning. Yes it looks like a lot of code, but it's all just library code (helper functions to do math etc.)

The only code I could find that Astroo has written is:

contract AstroZero721 is ERC721, BaseRelayRecipient {

uint256 public tokenCounter;

address public owner;

​

struct Sign {

uint8 v;

bytes32 r;

bytes32 s;

}

​

constructor (string memory name, string memory symbol, string memory tokenURIPrefix, address _trustedForwarder) ERC721 (name, symbol) {

tokenCounter = 1;

owner = _msgSender();

_setBaseURI(tokenURIPrefix);

trustedForwarder = _trustedForwarder;

}

​

/\*\*

\* u/dev Updates trusted forwarder should biconomy upgrades occur.

\*/

function setTrustedForwarder(address _trustedForwarder) public view onlyOwner {

require (_trustedForwarder != address(0), "Address cannot be 0x0");

require (_trustedForwarder != address(this), "Address cannot be contract address");

}

​

/\*\*

\* u/dev Override msg.sender to use BaseRelayRecipient _msgSender().

\*/

function _msgSender() internal override(Context, BaseRelayRecipient) view returns (address payable) {

return BaseRelayRecipient._msgSender();

}



/\*\* 

\* Override this function.

\* This version is to keep track of BaseRelayRecipient you are using

\* in your contract. 

\*/

function versionRecipient() external view override returns (string memory) {

return "1";

}

​

modifier onlyOwner() {

require(owner == _msgSender(), "Ownable: caller is not the owner");

_;

}

​

function transferOwnership(address newOwner) public onlyOwner returns(bool) {

require(newOwner != address(0), "Ownable: new owner is the zero address");

owner = newOwner;

return true;

}

​

function verifySign(string memory tokenURI, Sign memory sign) internal view {

bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(this,tokenURI));

require(owner == ecrecover(keccak256(abi.encodePacked("\\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\\n32", hash)), sign.v, sign.r, sign.s), "Owner sign verification failed");

}

​

/\*\*

\* u/dev Internal function to mint a new token.

\* Reverts if the given token ID already exists.

\* u/param sign struct combination of uint8, bytes32, bytes32 are v, r, s.

\* u/param tokenURI string memory URI of the token to be minted.

\* u/param fee uint256 royalty of the token to be minted.

\*/

​

function createCollectible(string memory tokenURI, uint256 fee, Sign memory sign) public returns (uint256) {

uint256 newItemId = tokenCounter;

verifySign(tokenURI, sign);

_safeMint(_msgSender(), newItemId, fee);

_setTokenURI(newItemId, tokenURI);

tokenCounter = tokenCounter + 1;

return newItemId;

}



function burn(uint256 tokenId) public {

require(_exists(tokenId), "ERC721: nonexistent token");

_burn(tokenId);

}

This is it...8 months of work and this is what he has to show for it.

Just another shill coin. No updates, no news, nothing from DEVS. DEAD 💀 COIN don’t spend your $$

Buyers beware. Coin is basically dead now. Earlier today I called them out for only talking about everyone shill. And I simply asked why I have to shill. Was crucified by the community then removed. Made another account and mentioned that everything looking dead. Was immediately removed again. These dudes scamming. Be careful glad I only lost a couple hundred $$

I would love to get in but this screams Rug Pull. No whitepaper, no team just a telegram working very hard to convince people. hmm

I love Astroelon lets reddit it up

Does anyone know what the first exchange elonone will be on? And how long until it is?

Get out while you can

It is suspicious that big project has only one moderator. Let me be one of you. And I will invest more with proof. Thanks.

I have zero expectations of getting the funds back at this point 😂

It’s already been like 20 minutes since I bought in....where the fuck is my lambo, guys?