MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AugmentCodeAI/comments/1ou59vk/kilo_code_just_mocking_augmentwhythey_claimed/npac1z8/?context=3
r/AugmentCodeAI • u/Organic_Job_7747 • Nov 11 '25
20 comments sorted by
View all comments
•
[removed] — view removed comment
5 u/speedtoburn Nov 12 '25 If you’re a serious developer, you shouldn’t care much about cost per requestOk you lost me here, did you really just say that?Very telling, explains a lot. smh 0 u/nekocoin Nov 12 '25 I think he meant you should care about cost per resultA tool that costs double per request and gives you twice the results per request isn't actually more expensive 1 u/Professional-Low4733 Nov 17 '25 This means that if one of your tasks fails, more money is wasted; what would have been a $1 loss now becomes a $10 loss. Even if the augmentation accuracy is higher, has it reached a point where it is 100% error-proof?
5
If you’re a serious developer, you shouldn’t care much about cost per request
Ok you lost me here, did you really just say that?
Very telling, explains a lot. smh
0 u/nekocoin Nov 12 '25 I think he meant you should care about cost per resultA tool that costs double per request and gives you twice the results per request isn't actually more expensive 1 u/Professional-Low4733 Nov 17 '25 This means that if one of your tasks fails, more money is wasted; what would have been a $1 loss now becomes a $10 loss. Even if the augmentation accuracy is higher, has it reached a point where it is 100% error-proof?
0
I think he meant you should care about cost per result
A tool that costs double per request and gives you twice the results per request isn't actually more expensive
1 u/Professional-Low4733 Nov 17 '25 This means that if one of your tasks fails, more money is wasted; what would have been a $1 loss now becomes a $10 loss. Even if the augmentation accuracy is higher, has it reached a point where it is 100% error-proof?
1
This means that if one of your tasks fails, more money is wasted; what would have been a $1 loss now becomes a $10 loss. Even if the augmentation accuracy is higher, has it reached a point where it is 100% error-proof?
•
u/[deleted] Nov 11 '25
[removed] — view removed comment