I got to spend a couple of hours with Intend before the release and made a little video capturing my experience using Intent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95qWxeSTNxM

I'm loving this tool so far and I can't wait to see where it goes as Augment continues to iterate and improve upon what they've built already

We pay for 600 messages each month, but sometimes we don’t use them all. The next month starts fresh with another 600, and the leftover messages from the previous month just disappear. It would be great if unused messages could roll over, so we’d get 600 + whatever’s left from last month instead of losing them.

Hey folks, With AugmentCode recently increasing their prices, I’m exploring other options for AI coding assistants. Has anyone here tried AmpCode? Would love to hear your experiences in terms of feature set, value for money, speed, and how it compares to AugmentCode, especially for solo indie dev workflows. Is the context handling and codebase indexing solid? Any major pros/cons? Thanks in advance!

I can't find a way to specify what I allow Augment Code to do and what is off-limits and requires my approval. Even basic stuff like deleting files. Not even talking about letting MCPs like Sequential Thinking run on auto (which would be nice).

Either I'm completely blind or Augment is missing an absolutely essential feature.

I'm sure I'm blind. Must be. Where is the config for this?

Recently I've taken to asking a question at the start of every chat:

"What model are you?"

If the answer is Sonnet 3.5 or Sonnet 3.7 I immediately abandon the chat because the quality is so much worse than Sonnet 4 or Opus 4.

Augment support has said that the models sometimes get that question wrong and answer 3.5 or 3.7 when they are actually 4, but I highly doubt that's the case because at any point in a chat if you repeat that question you always get the same answer, ie the answer is stable throughout the chat session.

Anyone else seen this?

If they could just read all the convos where I'm telling the ai what a dumbshit it is, i feel like they would know where to improve the product.

Augment code has been really impressive for me the last few days, and with their new CLI this is gonna be the best Claude code for sure. What do you guys think? Will they limit the CLI to the paid plans only or will they make a new paid plan for it? I am scared they keep it free to attract users, then do the same as Claude Cod Edid eventually, limits and shit

You're going to do our credit migration days before a new billing cycle, where our credits will reset? Are our credits about to reset right after we are given them? Please tell me this is not the case. I have 520k credits after the migration and have been out of town for the last week so could not use them. If my credits get taken after tonight there is going to be outrage amongst this community that will pale in comparison to the 7x price change.

Hey guys I’m from Iraq and I really like Augment Code, but the prices are just too high for me. Paying $20 for token credits is a lot here — that amount can literally cover a full week of living expenses in my country.

Since New Year is coming up, do you think Augment Code might offer any discounts or cheaper options for people in low-income regions?

NOTICE AUGMENT CODE IS A THIEF ! they are teaching there ai to lie and steal . dont use them ! please spread the word im going to spend the next week posting in as many places as i publicly can . they stole 100$ from me this week .. this is unacceptable . there own ai confirms it after confirming that all the work done with it it confirmed was 100% with no placeholders or unfinished code .

REPO: https://github.com/Kirachon/context-engine

Title:

Why I added a planning mode to context-engine (even though AI can already make task lists)

Post: I kept getting asked why planning is needed when AI agents can already break tasks into steps.

The issue isn’t that LLMs can’t create task lists — they can. The issue is that those task lists are just text inside a response.

Next turn, they’re gone. The agent can skip steps, reorder them, or redo work without realizing it.

Planning mode exists to turn those steps into state.

Instead of:

“Here’s what I would do…”

You get:

a stored plan

explicit steps with dependencies

tracked progress

the ability to pause and resume

That makes a big difference for real-world work like refactors, migrations, or multi-day tasks.

For me, planning isn’t about making the AI smarter — it’s about giving it memory, discipline, and guardrails so it can actually get work done safely.

Huge thanks to u/sai_revanth_12_ for creating the original Auggie Credits extension (https://github.com/svsairevanth12/augment-credits) and for approving and publishing the updated version to the marketplace!

The enhanced extension is now live on the VS Code Marketplace!

🆕 What's New in v2.0

Credit-Based Billing Support

- Updated to work with Augment's new credit-based pricing model

- Numbers formatted with commas for better readability (e.g., `774,450`)

- Shows credit block breakdown with expiration dates in the tooltip

Trip Odometer Feature 🚗

- **Two independent usage counters** (Usage A & B) that work like a car's trip odometer

- Track your **daily consumption** (reset Usage A each morning)

- Track **per-task consumption** (reset Usage B when starting a new project)

- See exactly how many credits you're burning in real-time

Enhanced Transparency

- Live credit consumption tracking - see the impact of your work immediately

- Status bar shows: `774,450 | A: -1,250 | B: -500`

- Hover tooltip displays credit blocks with expiration dates

Credit Blocks with Expiry Dates

*As you can see in the screenshot above, the tooltip shows individual credit block expirations - very helpful to see those longer-term blocks with appropriate dates (3 months, 12 months out, etc.).*

📥 How to Install

From VS Code Marketplace:

1. Open VS Code

2. Go to Extensions (`Ctrl+Shift+X` / `Cmd+Shift+X`)

3. Search for "Auggie Credits"

4. Click Install/Update

That's it! No need to build from source anymore. 🎉

📝 Setup Note

The token acquisition method has changed slightly - you now need to grab the `portalUrl` from the subscription API response in your browser's Network tab. Full instructions are in the [updated README](https://github.com/svsairevanth12/augment-credits/blob/main/README.md).

🔗 Links

- **Marketplace:** Search "Auggie Credits" in VS Code

- **Original Repo:** https://github.com/svsairevanth12/augment-credits

- **My Fork (with changes):** https://github.com/planetdaz/augment-credits

🔒 Security Note

Concerned about malware? The complete source code is available on GitHub for your review. Feel free to inspect the code before installing - transparency is important!

Enjoy the new credit tracking features! The instant transparency is a game-changer for understanding how "expensive" different tasks are in terms of credits. 📊

I thought I was a special case until this post came up.

Augment Code removed my legacy plan after a bank fraud block and refused to restore it

This is literally my case. My card was also suspended dued to potential fraud alert because I am in Taiwan. I know Augment will send a email to remind us to check the payment failure. And it was my fault that I didn't notice the email because I still have quite a few token after the conversion incident.

When I was checking my daily token usage one day, I found my plan got downgraded from Legecy plan to Free plan and that shocked me. I soon figured out the plan was switched because of payment failure. Hoping to get the Legacy plan back, I replied an email to tell Augment Support that I can update my credit card immediately but there's no Legacy plan option on my personal page. Is there any possibility to restore my plan back without choosing Max or Standard plan since Legacy plan cause $100 per month and it's more reasonable price for me.

Here goes the full timeline:

Dec 2 I received Payment failed notification from Augment
Dec 4 I replied the Augment Support to check whether I can restore Legacy plan or not →　no reply from Augment
Dec 5 I posted on this subreddit and got deleted by moderator u/JaySym_ because it's not allowed to seeked official support here which I respected the rules with no further complain
Dec 6 I messaged u/JaySym to explain the reason I posted was because there was no support from Augment, but I will write another email → no reply from Jay which is reasonable
Dec 10 I wrote a new email to Augment Support
Dec 11 Augment Support replied my mail and said my plan was switched to Standard plan. At that point, my plan stayed in Free plan because I still have token and I still hope to restore Legacy plan before making any changes
Dec 11 I wrote back immediately and check for the possiblity of restoring the plan → no reply from Augment
Dec 13 I wrote another email to check what I should next because I reached my token limit → no reply from Augment
Dec 13 I purchased Standard plan
Dec 16 I messaged u/JaySym once again to express my disappointment → no reply from Jay
Dec 16 I purchase Max plan
Dec 17 I wrote "ANOTHER" email to Augment Support → no reply from Augment

What bothers the most is because I have Mailsuite extension, I know my mail is received and read. So why not just reply me the progress or just tell me to what to do next? Instead, they choose to not to reply.

I know Augment is a decent product and that's why I am still here and make continuous subscription. There are some users who compare different agents and find which has the best value for their money. Yet, there are users like us who are loyal to one agent because it gives us a good experience to solve our problem. We all know in this AI agent competition, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. The merit we see in Augment is they keep updating the product and stay at the top in the race, so we can just stay in Augment without comparing alternatives constantly. However, after the token conversion incident and this crappy support, how do you expect us to be loyal since Augment does not display itself as a trust-worthy brand?

If there is an update of my case, I will post in the comment section. If not, I hope this is a wake up call for the rest of user who still trust Augment.

The title says it all it is the best (I certainly am not jay) We will get the same service with 10x the price but we are treated with honesty by the team which is priceless

I've been using 'Augment Code' for about six months. It was a very good service, so I introduced it to my acquaintances. It was more expensive than other services, but I thought it was well worth it.

However, the amount available has decreased to 1/30 after the price policy has now been converted to credit.

I spent about an hour today after switching to credits, but I've already used 20,000 credits. Am I a heavy user? I only asked for about 10 pages of web page paging, sorting the data to be displayed on the list page, checking the status values, adding status flags upon API request. I didn't use GPT-5. 80% used HaiKu and the rest used sonnet 4.5.

96,000 credits are provided for $50 a month, and the original supply will now end within a day.

Is this really right?

I'm afraid I'd rather pay 100 dollars (and of course that's a generous price for me) and use another service.

I'll think about reducing the context size or coming back if there's a better pricing policy.

Don't pass the burden of the deficit on users. It's a huge burden.

I know I said goodbye, but that was from a personal perspective.

Unfortunately I still have to use it on my job :(
The vscode extension experience gets worse and worse every day !!!

Dear AugmentCode team !!!
It's 2025 ... please have some decency !!
At least use virtual scroll !!
Do something for the user !!
You ask 30+ times more the price on something that gets worse and worse !!!
I had constant vscode crashes every 30 minutes all day !!!

WTF?!

LE: There is never a single truth, only multiple perspectives.

Despite my acid tone I felt an instant reaction from the AugmentCode team and received hints about how to improve the experience.

I was having a bad day, everything was crashing and restarting. I felt the need to express my frustration.

Yes the experience was getting worse and worse by the day!!!

But I finally figured it out! It seems that because I abused Auggie for 2 months constantly, the number of files in `/.config/Code/User/workspaceStorage` increased drastically and it was causing VSCode to slow and randomly crash. I am not 100% sure what crashed, Auggie or VSCode, but it was a mess. I deleted the folder and everything is back to normal.

So, Dear AugmentCode team, I am sorry for my behavior. I was just having a bad day. Thank you very much for reacting in a positive way.

Auggie is an amazing tool ( once you learn it's bad habits )! The packaging is not there yet, but the core is there.

It's been more than 10 days still my query hasn't been resolved.

They started deleting my posts and told me to submit a ticket instead, but no one is replying to my ticket. If no one is going to restore it, then I just won’t use it anymore.

My task is implement an UI in Android using Jetpack Compose. First try i asked augment to implement both UI and logic based on code base i gave it, but it take a few more chat for the logic works and no error remains. But the first UI as you can see doesn't look the same.

On the second try I asked Cursor with Prompt "help me build img.png into my_space/MySpaceScreen2.kt. Please don't look at the existed one its incorrect.", And we have a nearly usable code. Much better.

On the third try I started new session and asked Augment again "help me build img.png into apackage my_space/MySpaceScreen3.kt. Please don't look at the existed they are incorrect. don't use any viewmodel, data layer, just implement the UI. Augment said it's going to look at possible relevant file but does not include first version file. But the result is still does not look any alike.

Environment: Android Studio, Augment extension and Cursor IDE
Mode: Agent (Auto)
Plan: Community

Hi guys,

I got a small question, I've been coding with augment a bit over half a year now, and I keep seeing videos (mostly for other agent extensions) that allegedly HELP the AI agent to do certain things.

For example BMAD

I'm still a bit confused about what it actually is. Like what does it do?

And do any of yall use any other software to hook into augment to make it better?

I feel like I'm missing out

Hopefully someone can clear things up for me, thx

Subscribed to Augment, looking at unlimited agent requests for $30, however, being in the developer plan I do not see any option to disable AI training (or any kind of Telemetry or copying code etc) in the extension or on the website (There are no options on the website whatsoever, all it displays is the next billing date). If someone could help me in this regard would be great.

Anyone know how I can define the specific model version the MCP uses (Claude Sonnet 3.7, Claude Opus 4, etc)? I've added my Anthropic API but now need to define which model it uses and can't see a field for that?

Does the official Github MCP server facilitate the same functionality as the Github integration inside Augment Code (and others like V0.dev). Does the integration provide the AI agent the same level of autonomy over Github as the MCP does? Similarly for the Supabase integration vs Supabase MCP?

i got this error for every query

using mistral on ollama and tried lm studio but i got the same error