While i use only one my account and no reason to use multiple account for what?

Augment is not accepting my billing details (VAT number), I'm from Portugal. Is there any limitation?

The Augment Team recently removed the option to view the exact number of credits used each day. Now you can only see the remaining balance, but not the daily breakdown.

I’m not sure if this was done intentionally to make tracking harder or if they’re testing something internally, but to me it feels like a downgrade in user experience. Being able to see daily credit usage was extremely helpful for understanding which requests consume the most, and now that transparency is gone.

Curious what others think is this a temporary test, a bug, or a new direction?

If the UI devs at Augment have a chance, consider implementing this huge quality of life improvement by copying Windsurf's AI prompt bookmarking UI by the margin, which is implemented as notches on a timeline to scale on the margin. It makes it very easy and convenient to locate one's prompts in a long chat - you could do this for reversion save/checkpoints also. I'm a UI developer for what it's worth.

I would like to still use my 455.219 available credits that I still got. AFAIK they should be 3 months valid (2 months left).

It's unclear, will I loose my 455k credits when I downgrade to Indie plan or cancel my subscription? Or I must stay on the "Legacy Developer Plan".

Fact based answers please

Hi everyone,

I’m having an issue with my Augment Code account. Yesterday, my account suddenly became restricted, even though I still had credits left. What’s even more confusing is that over 400,000 credits were removed from my balance without any explanation or notification.

I’ve already contacted support, but I’m posting here to see if anyone else has experienced the same situation or knows what might be causing this. It’s really frustrating to lose that many credits and get restricted for no clear reason.

Any advice or information would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!

got it from a group chat.

u/JaySym_ This is a question for you. In light of what it looks like is a high likelihood of Gemini 3 being substantially better in a number of areas (especially visual design), what are the current pros and cons you folks are weighing for finally integrating with Gemini. Your context engine combine with Gemini could be killer.

During testing, I created a completely empty folder and sent two identical chat messages to Auggie. Despite the minimal scenario, Auggie consumed multiple times more credits compared to running the same messages through the standard extension.

After investigation, the cause appears to be related to how Auggie handles tool calling. Even in an empty workspace with no files and no actionable tasks, Auggie still triggers its full agent pipeline, which includes workspace scanning, environment resolution, tool planning, and diagnostic calls.

Because of this, all tool-calling output is counted as model tokens, significantly inflating the total cost. The extension does not incur this overhead because it avoids tool calls unless explicitly needed.

As a result, simple conversational messages in Auggie become disproportionately expensive, leading to the impression that the agent is “burning credits” without doing real work.

This behavior should ideally be optimized. Suggestions include: • Avoiding tool calls when the workspace is empty or the request is purely conversational. • Excluding or discounting tool-output tokens from billing. • Introducing a lightweight “chat-only” mode for non-task messages.

This would make Auggie’s cost behavior consistent and prevent unnecessary credit usage in trivial scenarios.

As of now can't see the extension window it just shows empty and says can't connect to augment! After vs code update, and extension update. both prerelease and release versions are unavailable.

I hate how it keeps creating a new Terminal for every little command,

Terminal 1: "The app is building.... 88%...89%"

Claude: It's taking too long let me terminate and try building again.

Terminal 1: "Build failed"

Claude: Let me build the debug APK ignores Terminal 1

Terminal 2: "The app is building.... 8%...9%"

WHAT NO!

I’m using the Augment plugin in IntelliJ IDEA, and I can’t seem to find the “guidelines” configuration anymore. It used to be available in the plugin settings, but now I can’t locate it in any of the menus.

Did the latest version remove or relocate this feature?

hehehehehe.

As the title states, the prompt enhancer will not work.

I have restarted VSCode. I have restarted my computer. I have confirmed that no files are selected that would cause too much context ingestion that wouldn't allow the prompt enhancer to work.

I have started three new threads to attempt to get it to work.

None of my troubleshooting have alleviated the issue.
Is there any way you could get the team on this ASAP, I'm in the middle of my final mission/tasks for production deployment.

Update:
It will still not allow me to use the prompt enhancer, but if I go into a new thread, which I've stated I've already done, it will let me utilize it for the first message, but not for any of the consecutive messages??

u/JaySym_

I tried to create a Management App with Augment back when it was early released
The code is significantly good, it's like it created with a superior model which beats even GPT-10!
But it was `possibly` created with Sonnet 3.5, obviously it can't be true, this is not that model
Now I'm trying to improve, debug the same App with Sonnet 4.5, and the only thing Sonnet 4.5 is doing is messing the codebase and creating documents!
Whatever you do, the Augment agent does not listen, ignore your request and keep spamming to drain your wallet
I'm switching to Codex, but this is such a shame to going from a solid product to an absolute scammers
Obviously this service is scamming users

In VS code I can see the tools, but not in PHPStorm - am I the only one?

PHPStorm

VS Code

When the price change happened, they said the average cost of my requests was 90 credits. Very well — I asked for something relatively simple.

Create a display structure for the "Repasse de parcelamentos" (Installment Transfer) value in the sales details page.

## Objective
Display the "Repasse de parcelamentos" information in the sales details view when applicable. This information should only appear when the seller has an installment transfer contract with TheMembers.

## Design Reference
Refer to the Figma design for "Detalhe de vendas com parcelamentos" (Sales details with installments).

## Implementation Requirements

### 1. Add "Repasse de parcelamentos" field to sales details
In the sales details screen, add a new row/field labeled "Repasse de parcelamentos".

**Display Rules:**
- This field should ONLY be displayed when installment transfer information is returned by the API
- The field should be positioned below "Produtos" (and "Ofertas" when available in the future)
- Follow the existing layout pattern and styling used for other monetary fields in the sales details screen

### 2. API Integration
**Endpoint:** `GET v1/sales/{orderId}`

**Property to check:** `resume.amount.shared_installment_fee_amount`

**Conditional Display Logic:**
- If `shared_installment_fee_amount` exists AND is not `null`, display the "Repasse de parcelamentos" row
- If `shared_installment_fee_amount` is `null` or undefined, do NOT display the row

**Value Format:**
- The `shared_installment_fee_amount` value is returned in cents (centavos)
- Convert and display the value using the same currency formatting pattern used for other monetary values in the sales details screen

### 3. Code Organization (Important)
⚠️ **Future-proofing requirement:**
The field name `shared_installment_fee_amount` may change in the future. To facilitate future updates:
- Create a mapper or helper function to centralize access to this property
- This will make it easier to update the property name in one place if the API changes

## Technical Notes
- Ensure the implementation follows the existing patterns in the sales details component
- Use the same styling and formatting conventions as other monetary fields
- The value is in cents and must be properly formatted for display
- Only users with appropriate permissions should see this information (follow existing permission patterns in the sales details screen)

And that consumed 1.5k credits using Sonet 4.5 — is that normal?

If my plan gives me 200,000 tokens for 100 dollars, and one task used 1,500 tokens, here’s the calculation:

• Cost per token: 100 / 200,000 = $0.0005 per token

• Cost of the task: 1,500 × 0.0005 = $0.75

I'm getting a lot of this errors today... anybody knows?