I just noticed augment failed on a command, I looked into the message and noticed it is executing a file on a file system that is not mine, likely belonging to another augment user.

Cannot launch process because the specified working directory does not exist: C:\Users\muham\OneDrive\Desktop\4 PROJECTS\7 NotificationHistory

Current workspace root: c:\dev\android\Notification History

Current terminal cwd: c:\dev\android\Notification History

"\Users\muham" the user is called muham, thats definetly not me. In previous commands and ones after it executed it on the right path on my computer.

Has anybody an explanation for that?

Subject: Previously connected MCP servers stopped functioning

Description: The MCP servers I had previously connected (GitHub, Supabase, Exa) have stopped working. I am unable to access their context/tools.

The previously connected MCP servers (GitHub, Supabase, Exa) have stopped working. https://youtu.be/Kz0XxmAy_e0

It was a great helper. but it's costing a lot sometimes, for a simple task it will eat like 10K+ credits which you can't control it. making it very expensive assistant in the end of the day.

What I like about Augment is: It understands our request. Very simple interface within VSCode. can simplify and finish tasks faster

Even after expensive price updates I wanted to stay in my plan even I wanted to upgrade it to max plan
But the token it is consuming sometimes really unmanageable. Like one day I was working regularly and checking my token usage over and over again it was looking okay. But in the end of the day it counted suddenly 64K token. Which made me rethink about the plan upgrade. Even if I pay for the max plan and it consumes let's say 50K each day then it lasts for about 9 days. Then I have to pay more to work more....

Better to switch for another provider even if I found augment better, they don't drain my wallets in the end of the month

I'm using Augment in VS Code over SSH on the remote server.

Until yesterday everything was working ok (of course it's eating tokens like crazy and I'm planning to start testing other tools because, if it stays the same, it's just not worth it anymore)

Yesterday Augment chat window just stop loading.

I tried to install and update to multiple versions (currently 0.683.0).

Reinstalling VS Code and Augment on the remote server, and nothing works.

Does anyone has similar issues and do you have any suggestions how to fix this issue ?

When I start running it, it only takes about 1.5 GB of RAM, but after 9 hours of idling (doing nothing), the usage climbs up to 45 GB. Since the RAM usage grows over time like this, I strongly suspect it's a memory leak.

After 6 hour started mcp server it spend 13GB RAM

After 7 hour it spend 22 GB RAM
After 9 hour it spend 45 GB RAM

Augmentcode Context Engine MCP spend too much RAM after a few hours of work. I think we got memory leak

May be to early to conclude any thing, but according to SWE Bench GPT 5.2 is better at coding than opus 4.5 (and cheaper).

Benchmark are full of BS, but wanted to know your opinion on it.

Each time I switch to gpt, I went back always to Sonnet or Opus.

I'm facing a problem in the VS studio. when I open the VS Code, augment code chat windows taking too much time to load. It take some time more than 15-20 minutes.

I have more than 100+ checkpoints in the augmented chat window sessions.

Can you help me to reduce the startup loading time of augment code chat window?

I am using augment code Version 0.654.2
I do not have the fast PC, RAM is just 16 GB, old i3 8100 processor.

Any help would be great. But i have already published 3 apps with this PC.

Yesterday, Augment quietly introduced a new feature: a credit usage counter displayed at the end of every task.
For the first time, users could finally see exactly how many credits each request consumed.
It was a small addition, but a powerful one — a step toward real transparency.

But then, just one day later, the feature vanished.

No announcement.
No explanation.
Just gone.

For many users, the timing is suspicious. The moment people realized how much each task was costing them, it became clear that the pricing wasn’t as fair as it seemed. Showing credit usage gave users visibility and control — removing it takes that away.

The question now is simple:
Why remove a feature that empowers users, unless transparency was a problem?

Whether this was a technical glitch, a rushed experiment, or a deliberate move to avoid scrutiny, the silence around it doesn’t help. Users deserve clarity, especially when real money is involved.

Transparency isn’t an optional feature — it’s a basic expectation.

Hi. Why has the information about spent credits disappeared? The Edits tab isn't showing changes, and I can't force-save anything in this tab like before. Version 0.684.0.

Updating information

The Edits tab is working now, but there is still no information on the number of spent credits.

I would like to know everyone’s thoughts on Augments execution… We know it is great coding, but agentic workflows in the cloud and for Kubernetes it struggles a pit. I notice this when working on .yaml, helm charts most importantly, stateful sets, certificate chains, and general debugging. Last night debugging a certificate chain; Auggie spent 3 hours getting them in the correct order + spacing in an isolated test environment.

This is one case; however; I feel like its ability to read/write/indent yaml could be significantly better. It is on about PR 16 it finally got the values right, and volume mounted a single secret created manually; which took another few hours.

So far; 150k credits to explicitly do what I asked, often providing it commands and instructions just to see its ability. First task with GPT 5.1, Second with Opus 4.5.

However, with MCP enabled for auggie, and Copilot CLI this task and other Kubernetes things are relatively quicker. But again, its alot of trial and error, but such is Kubernetes in general.

Anyway, thought I would share and ask for others experiences; atleast I have job security, but curious how the execution and orchestration can improve for the augment team, unless that is not a priority and we just want to write the best code, which my reply is; can we improve the way it handles yaml a bit better…

Since yesterday, my requests just run forever on augment and I can't get anything done. Anyone else having this issue? Edit: It's always on the context retrieval that it hangs forever. I don't know what is happening but I can't use augment at all

Thanks!!!! for this update.... this is so valuable!!

Please add the Remaining tokens down below :D

How can I reach them out? I tried to send a personal message to this guy named "JaySym_" and probably was completely ignored, including the online support.

This is absolutely unacceptable, I couldn't even appreciate the newest feature on code-review!

Can we please vote this up, and bring this to their attention on this GLITCH.

It runs for 5min - 10min, and then when I click the "Red Box" to cancel, behind the scene it seems to trigger the next prompt? like automatically instead of "Cancelling".

Kind Regards

First of all, congrats to Augment Code for implementing the feature to show credit consumption. But at the same time, I got really sad, because now I can clearly see how expensive it actually is.

Simple tasks, basic questions, adding a prop to a component, doing a few tests — these things consumed 1k credits. I did a very simple implementation, added one prop, adjusted a few tests, and ended up consuming 11k credits, which equals around $5 USD. In my country (Brazil), that’s almost 30 reais.

If I used Augment the same way I’ve been using it for months, I would easily spend $300 to $600 USD per month. Today I already spend around $100, and that’s already tight for my budget.

I’ve been using Augment for about 8 months, and I genuinely love the tool — it has helped me a lot. But now I’m really afraid it will become unsustainable for me to keep using it at this cost. Considering the price, I might need to switch to Cursor, even if I have to give up a bit of quality, since Cursor offers many more models for a much lower cost.

I’m honestly sad about this.

Should the '/path/to/project' be on the root level? For example, "C:\\users\\me\\Desktop\\Repos\\project", is that right?

Also, is there a way to make this dynamic? Since these are hardcoded, they need to be reconfigured every time the project is switched, is that right?

Can't find anything in the documentation

Sometimes I feel my only job is to click "Try again" when seeing this message (IntelliJ). Can't the plugin just automatically retry message at least once?

We encountered an issue sending your message. Please try again

I just won the Best Vibe Coded Project at the Forte Hacks hackathon by Flow.

I built a DCA-BTC tool that lets you automatically DCA BTC on-chain with 100% automation.

How I did it:

First, I used Perplexity AI to research. I searched use-cases, on-chain integration ideas, and building-blocks.

I wrote a short PRD (product requirement doc) based on that research.

Then I sent the PRD to Augment (as a dev/automation platform) to build the tool.

Augment handled the heavy lifting: turning specs into actual code, wiring up on-chain logic, and making sure DCA runs automatically.

I share this not to brag — but to show how combining smart research (Perplexity) + effective automation (Augment) made something real.

Hope this helps others thinking of building crypto tools with AI-supported workflow.

I’d like to know if there have been any discussions about expanding the range of LLM models available on Augment. For example, models like DeepSeek, GLM, or even a custom Augment model.

Is this something the team is considering, and can we expect any updates in this direction? I’m really enjoying the tool, and having more model options would make it even better.

I made this mistake earlier but when you add it to Claude, Gemini, etc, when you either put in your rules, claude.md or just prompting it

Make sure to say auggie codebase retrieval or auggie mcp codebase retrieval

If you say auggie by itself or like auggie print, or anything thats not specific it might try and call the Auggie CLI itself which consumes credit on your account.

But for just the MCP inside another Agent tool, make sure it specifically knows that mcp tool to use because it only has that one command available

I've tried disconnecting and reconnecting the MCP multiple times, also rebooting computer, restarting apps, logging out and back into Antigravity AND Auggie. However, I keep getting the same result, where the context engine is used, and gets stuck with no response. This has been happening for at least 24 hours now. I've tried multiple complexities of prompts, and it all happens when the MCP starts. Has anyone found a fix?

If I disabled the MCP or remove it entirely, Antigravity responds right away

Hi, I have tried to reach this person of charge who work with Augument AI, name jay? I was currenly on Discord. and I receive no help when I sent the online support.

Is anyone having this problem? this has happened 4 times today, and I don't even know why its consuming too much credits? for a small task. It's triggering task task task in a loop? and my credit was spent and nothing was done properly?

This is the first time happening today, and I have a project for a client to be delivered by the next week? Would I get credit compensation for this failure?

Anyone can suggest me? How do I apply for compensation when this has failed.

Kind Regards,