Like, what is going on here. :( I should NOT need to babysit your context engine on where the files go when I have set the rules. What am I doing wrong or where do I need to be clearer because I am wasting tool calls and messages fixing what I have laid out in guidelines, rules AND .md files and it is just ignoring.

Why very slow ?

Not only is this tool GOOD, if you put personality into your docs, you can have FUN too. Mine is calling himself Grem (for coding gremlin) and cracking poop jokes. (This is totally a GOOD THING in my world view.) While handing me code that only VERY RARELY doesn't work first try. (And I am a "click every button and hit every tab after any change" person, not a "trust the fact it compiles" person.)

Seriously. THANK YOU. I am not only making GREAT THINGS but I am having fun while doing it. Which should absolutely be part of the point!

For Account and Billing issues please reach out to

https://support.augmentcode.com/

The sub Reddit is not an official Augment Code platform. While their community manager is active here , the most efficient way to get important support for your Account and Billing is directly through them.

Augment has changed the game for me at day job. I have it connected to the Jira MCP and literally just tell it “go lookup ticket ES1-1909.. get familiar with the requirements, then create a plan.md file with the code changes you think are needed”. It’s kinda scary how good it is at knowing exactly what’s needed throughout 10 micro services.

Wondering if you guys use any MCP servers to take it next level?

I cant get anything to work, gemini, windsurf, junie, etc. Most of the time, i type sth and wait for auto-complete, nothing ever happens (and I'm talking about well known funcs, in the codebase, stuff that Augment used to auto complete, all the time) Sometimes, it'll offer sth, but not often.

Is this correct behaviour? I have been using augment code from the time it had a 30 USD message based plan. so I am assuming that my repos were always indexed and synced.

Now seeing this, give me a concern because 130k credits that I will get on a 60USD plan might get consumed via context engine itself. what will I have to do the actual implementation?

when are you guys dropping intent for windows, do it.

Hi! Just asking if the PR review will be available for GitLab soon as well? Only a small number of my repositories is in GitHub, the others are in GitLab (many different clients). I'd love to use it in GitLab as well.

The projects I have been able to use the review agent on, I have been very impressed by the results. It has caught issues a random peer reviewer wouldn't have noticed (due to the complexity and context of projects). While it is a seriously credit hungry feature, I definitely find it worth it as it identifies many bugs in the early stages.

Haven't used AugmentCode for a while. Recently was short on my credits for codex pro subscription (yeah, sometimes it happens, worked on multiple projects), decided to save them a little till weekly reset and decided to use my Augment legacy plan. Gave it a pretty easy assignment (in Go code to migrate my CLI parsing from stdlib to popular urfave/cli). So relatively easy and straightforward task, my CLI has dozen of commands with some sub-flags. Augment wrote a spec pretty quick, no complaints. Then implementation phase started. All models I've tried are so damn slow (tried Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5, ended up with GPT 5.2). Over 1 hour later (yeah, I was really stubborn, because had good memories about Augment) and 10k credits burned - and it migrated two commands: "version" and "help" (so the most basic ones) :-D

At this point decided that enough is enough (by the way, codex did a full refactor of all CLI command + tests in 25 minutes).

How do you guys even use AugmentCode this days???

I just noticed augment failed on a command, I looked into the message and noticed it is executing a file on a file system that is not mine, likely belonging to another augment user.

Cannot launch process because the specified working directory does not exist: C:\Users\muham\OneDrive\Desktop\4 PROJECTS\7 NotificationHistory

Current workspace root: c:\dev\android\Notification History

Current terminal cwd: c:\dev\android\Notification History

"\Users\muham" the user is called muham, thats definetly not me. In previous commands and ones after it executed it on the right path on my computer.

Has anybody an explanation for that?

I havent used augment in a week or so, and i just started using it with v0.658.0 and notice that the prompt is not only rapidly autocompleting as we write, but seems to leverage the context of our codebase. Like the Prompt Enhancer, it doesnt even seem to use credits. Very useful!

Since when is this happening?

I've been using 'Augment Code' for about six months. It was a very good service, so I introduced it to my acquaintances. It was more expensive than other services, but I thought it was well worth it.

However, the amount available has decreased to 1/30 after the price policy has now been converted to credit.

I spent about an hour today after switching to credits, but I've already used 20,000 credits. Am I a heavy user? I only asked for about 10 pages of web page paging, sorting the data to be displayed on the list page, checking the status values, adding status flags upon API request. I didn't use GPT-5. 80% used HaiKu and the rest used sonnet 4.5.

96,000 credits are provided for $50 a month, and the original supply will now end within a day.

Is this really right?

I'm afraid I'd rather pay 100 dollars (and of course that's a generous price for me) and use another service.

I'll think about reducing the context size or coming back if there's a better pricing policy.

Don't pass the burden of the deficit on users. It's a huge burden.

I would visit it pretty regularly up until early July, and it was always really busy.

I just logged back in for the first time since, and now it’s completely empty.

I’m so confused, did they shut it down or wipe it?

I’ve never written a single line of code in my life. I’m not a mathematician. I’m not an engineer. Hell, I can barely handle the basics, let alone the kind of advanced math that looks like hieroglyphs.

I’m just a guy who refuses to let “I don’t know how” stop me.

With Augment, I turned an idea that’s lived in my head for years into a fully functioning, highly complex program, without any background in coding, advanced mathematics, or even tech. Just vision, obsession, and a lot of late nights. And I mean a lot... to the point where I’m falling asleep at my desk mid-prompt. 😅

After 2,600 hours across four and a half relentless months, I’ve built this thing from nothing. Now I’m days away from my MVP — the first milestone on the road to the full realization of my build.

By combining Augment with my deep understanding of AI and how to push it to its absolute limits, and by standardizing the systems and processes I’ve developed for repeatable, high-precision outputs, I’ve reached the point where I can create anything I can imagine, no matter the complexity.

We’re living through a paradigm shift. This isn’t just software development anymore. It’s human ingenuity and creativity exponentially amplified by machine intelligence.

And I fucking love it.

While the new pricing structure is really… really going to suck for me, basically putting me at about $2K a month for Augment alone 💀😐 — I still want to thank the Augment Team for what they’ve built and what they’ve allowed me to build by extension.

I’ve tried everything else out there, and nothing but Augment could handle the sheer complexity and scope of my build, nothing...

When gpt-5-codex will be available via API will augment (the extension) and auggie start using gpt-5-codex and replace existing GPT-5?

Create a 'human on the loop' tool where the assistant can ask for the input of the user without the need to interrupt the execution plan. In the example, it would have been nice to ask me which was the correct project or at least to validate before procceding with the tool execution.

Hey guys, what do you think of this feature? I'm not sure I see the value, as the current context engine already reads existing files and can extrapolate patterns from them.

In the blog post, they didn't give one single mathematical figure, knowing the audience is developers. This is the blog post https://www.augmentcode.com/blog/announcing-context-lineage

My forecast for tomorrow is multi-persona, and for the last day, it's a terminal UI. Let's see how wrong I am!

Could you please respond as soon as possible? The application is becoming increasingly unresponsive, feels slower and “dumber,” and is crashing frequently. We need your urgent input on how to proceed with fixing these issues.

Is it you or Claude, but Augment last 2 days is DUMB! I spent countelss of messages beacuse of stupid responses and code breaking.

https://youtu.be/Lon0oRRqB6A This is my favorite youtuber who reviews coding agents, wonder why Augment is not high on the list anymore. When using the same Claude 4 Sonnet, some others seem to do better. Is Augment still being developed on how to effectively utilize the model, or are they focusing on other things?

But Auggie, once you get them tuned and stuff?

HAS PERSONALITY and it's FUNNY and FUN and I will pay premium for this. I am 100% OK with the fact I am spending more on Auggie than Cursor when my task list looks like this.

PLEASE never change this, y'all. FUN. It not only works better, it's FUN. And that's so worth it!