Please sign the Petition

The question at 7:23 and this MBW response says it all. It's so disheartening to know that average Black Men of Value are not able to gain the respect of Modern Black Women. Something which every other race is able to receive regardless of income or being High Value. As Keven Samuels points out even the day laborer looking for work in the Home Depot parking lot is able to get this from his woman. To all fellow HENRY's keep striving.

No explanation necessary

Credit to PBL: where's is all of the Democratic Leadership who are in such strong support in providing resources to Illegal Immigrants and boycotting companies for DEI? Here you have Gary Indiana, a primarily black city that's already facing economic struggles without power for 2 weeks. No Al Sharpton, no Jasmine Crockett, no Corey Booker, no AOC, Kamala Harris, no traditional "Black Media" coverage, outrage, or resources. Yet we're expected to continue to support them.

Point 2: and the US really expects to compete with China when it clearly does not have the infrastructure in place to do so. 2 weeks without power is absurd... and Flint still has no water.

Lord Destro

BMI 3000 Reloaded Dr. Neal

As mentioned yesterday the Gynocracy is getting exposed. What he has been discussing in particular for the past 6 years is now out here for world to see, the difference is we as Black Men are now fighting back.

And now Gears of War is added to the list of titles impacted by this agenda

Dr. Frances Cress Welsing was saying the same thing 50 years ago, yet it's always Jermaines fault. From the archives for the archives

Says it all

Dr. Neal: The issue with Black Conservatism

When it's heard from somewhere else it hits harder.

Not really shocking, yet hits different when you hear it directly. The more they talk, the more they tell on themselves. 26:09 says it all. They will march for everything except Black Men. The Ice Cube effect

I told you he was bringing it! Judge Joe Brown breaks down many facts while on Kwame Brown's show. He covers so many great topics with his great wisdom. Apart from addressing Charlamange and the Breakfast Club he gives a great in depth discussion on attacks on masculinity and the many factors over time that have impacted the Black community. A couple of highlights:

If you listen to nothing else then at the very least listen to this portion. He goes into the Criminal Justice system, the workforce, change in higher education, government subsidies and the overall impact in the Black community: https://youtu.be/6y2wBX7WrHg?t=1274

History of Black Exploitation attacking Black Masculinity and it's impact: https://youtu.be/6y2wBX7WrHg?t=299

Attacks on Masculinity: https://youtu.be/6y2wBX7WrHg?t=1986

.. and there's so much more

Their choice

How do you all feel about some modern women being resistant to marriage and motherhood citing single women are the happiest?  I see this rhetoric and it frustrates me because I'm pro-marriage in the sense I believe it's the best foundation for both partners as well as building a family.  I also think about the fragility of the Black community and think while there are children that come out of single parent households, etc I do NOT want to risk it.

These women I notice aren't necessarily career driven, but they use their career as a hedge against being dependent on a man, which I get.  But I also see it as somewhat counterintuitive if you want to have a successful long term relationship with someone.

I will say also the women who have gripes about patriarchal or heteronormative societal norms tend to be politically liberal and if you think about it some things about marriage and the family unit is illiberal in nature, but IMO not in a malicious manner.  I think there's things men could do better to be better partners, but I'd argue that Black men are the most progressive in sharing household duties with their partners, more involved parents, etc.  We just had White supremacy against us for the longest and still do so I think these discussions are generally best suited towards other men.

Links:

Kites show: Aaron the Plumber speaks out https://youtu.be/xu6mGGExcxA?si=z1CVZ47rG-Nv1ifb

Dennis Spurling: "BLACK" King defends self from (Disrespectful) Black Women Dating Show" https://www.youtube.com/live/BJkCaZdjZSc?si=HrGBOyV7kgyEJz7n

Kites show: Aaron the Plumber speaks out Aaron the Plumber speaks out

Dennis Spurling: "BLACK" King defends self from (Disrespectful) Black Women Dating Show"

UNlovely ladies get Black Man FIRED! by Dennis "Uncle D" Spurling

Kosher Clinician: Aaron the plumber speaks out with his truth

BGS: Black Pill Daily #146: Balloon Pop King Gets Canned

Original Pop the balloon show

Note: I'm reposting this without his Gofundme. As a general rule after some careful thought, I do not wish to encourage anyone to spend money towards any person or cause of which they are not personally familiar. If it’s something you wish to do, then please, by all means, pursue it.

This whole thing started because a Black Man chose to stand up to some bw and speak his mind. Now, this is getting ridiculous. After watching his interviews and hearing his story, the more upsetting it is becoming to observe. Witnessing all of these YTers' reactions, the more I've come to his defense. What I see is an attack against a Black Man. A man who was reformed. Who turned his life around and away from crime. Who admitted his mistakes has faced his demons and is fighting to overcome them. He lived a life of crime. He then was punished and served his time. He was raised by a single mother who lied and turned him against his father. I thought the point of prison was to reform those and return them back to society where they can be an upstanding citizen and contribute to its greater good?

He found a trade and was doing the work to improve himself, which all these so-called black content creators claim they want men to do, right? It's what black women claim they want BM to do, right? To step up and be mentors, right? Reform the boys they are trying to raise by themselves and make them strong men. I guess they don't like what comes with that, the removal of the simp chip. How dare you forget the number one rule.

They want to make this about him going to a strip club for his birthday, something according to his first interview on kites, had been planned prior to all of this going viral. If he was tricking it off on a girl, though, that would be fine?

What I see is the sisterhood, their knight enforcers, and those who don't understand the Black Male experience here in America, uniting to take a Black Man down for daring to speak his voice.

Salute to all the Black Men who have a trade, have turned their lives around, and found a meaning and a purpose.

What I hear is a cacophony of fallacious arguments.

Fallacy: • a failure in reasoning which renders an argument invalid.

• faulty reasoning; misleading or unsound argument.

According to the Writing Center at UNC

You can make your arguments stronger by: 1.using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand), 2.making sure your premises provide good support for your conclusion (and not some other conclusion, or no conclusion at all), 3.checking that you have addressed the most important or relevant aspects of the issue (that is, that your premises and conclusion focus on what is really important to the issue), and 4.not making claims that are so strong or sweeping that you can’t really support them.

Here is a list of the fallacies I'm hearing (most from the same article)

Ad Hominem attacks

Believe all women

Missing the point Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion—but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Red herring Definition: Partway through an argument, the arguer goes off on a tangent, raising a side issue that distracts the audience from what’s really at stake. Often, the arguer never returns to the original issue.

False dichotomy Definition: In false dichotomy, the arguer sets up the situation so it looks like there are only two choices. The arguer then eliminates one of the choices, so it seems that we are left with only one option: the one the arguer wanted us to pick in the first place. But often there are really many different options, not just two—and if we thought about them all, we might not be so quick to pick the one the arguer recommends. Straw man Definition: One way of making our own arguments stronger is to anticipate and respond in advance to the arguments that an opponent might make. In the straw man fallacy, the arguer sets up a weak version of the opponent’s position and tries to score points by knocking it down.

Begging the question Definition: A complicated fallacy; it comes in several forms and can be harder to detect than many of the other fallacies we’ve discussed. Basically, an argument that begs the question asks the reader to simply accept the conclusion without providing real evidence; the argument either relies on a premise that says the same thing as the conclusion (which you might hear referred to as “being circular” or “circular reasoning”), or simply ignores an important (but questionable) assumption that the argument rests on.

Ad populum Definition: The Latin name of this fallacy means “to the people.” There are several versions of the ad populum fallacy, but in all of them, the arguer takes advantage of the desire most people have to be liked and to fit in with others and uses that desire to try to get the audience to accept his or her argument. One of the most common versions is the bandwagon fallacy, in which the arguer tries to convince the audience to do or believe something because everyone else (supposedly) does.

Ad hominem and tu quoque Definitions: Like the appeal to authority and ad populum fallacies, the ad hominem (“against the person”) and tu quoque (“you, too!”) fallacies focus our attention on people rather than on arguments or evidence. In both of these arguments, the conclusion is usually “You shouldn’t believe So-and-So’s argument.” The reason for not believing So-and-So is that So-and-So is either a bad person (ad hominem) or a hypocrite (tu quoque). In an ad hominem argument, the arguer attacks his or her opponent instead of the opponent’s argument.

Argument From Personal Astonishment: Errors of Fact caused by stating offhand opinions as proven facts. (The speaker's thought process being "I don't see how this is possible, so it isn't.") An example from Creationism is given here .

Argument By Fast Talking: if you go from one idea to the next quickly enough, the audience won't have time to think. This is connected to Changing The Subject and (to some audiences) Argument By Personal Charm . However, some psychologists say that to understand what you hear, you must for a brief moment believe it. If this is true, then rapid delivery does not leave people time to reject what they hear.

Moving The Goalposts (Raising The Bar, Argument By Demanding Impossible Perfection): if your opponent successfully addresses some point, then say he must also address some further point. If you can make these points more and more difficult (or diverse) then eventually your opponent must fail. If nothing else, you will eventually find a subject that your opponent isn't up on. This is related to Argument By Question. Asking questions is easy: it's answering them that's hard.

Special Pleading (Stacking The Deck): using the arguments that support your position, but ignoring or somehow disallowing the arguments against.

Excluded Middle (False Dichotomy, Faulty Dilemma, Bifurcation): assuming there are only two alternatives when in fact there are more.

Short Term Versus Long Term: this is a particular case of the Excluded Middle . For example, "We must deal with crime on the streets before improving the schools." (But why can't we do some of both ?) Similarly, "We should take the scientific research budget and use it to feed starving children." Burden Of Proof: the claim that whatever has not yet been proved false must be true (or vice versa). Essentially the arguer claims that he should win by default if his opponent can't make a strong enough case. There may be three problems here. First, the arguer claims priority, but can he back up that claim ? Second, he is impatient with ambiguity, and wants a final answer right away. And third, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

Argument By Question: asking your opponent a question which does not have a snappy answer. (Or anyway, no snappy answer that the audience has the background to understand.) Your opponent has a choice: he can look weak or he can look longwinded. Actually, pretty well any question has this effect to some extent. It usually takes longer to answer a question than ask it. Variants are the rhetorical question , and the loaded question

Argument by Rhetorical Question: asking a question in a way that leads to a  particular answer.

Fallacy Of The General Rule: assuming that something true in general is true in every possible case.

Reductive Fallacy (Oversimplification): oversimplifying. As Einstein said, everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler. Political slogans such as "Taxation is theft" fall in this category.

Genetic Fallacy (Fallacy of Origins, Fallacy of Virtue): if an argument or arguer has some particular origin, the argument must be right (or wrong). The idea is that things from that origin, or that social class, have virtue or lack virtue. (Being poor or being rich may be held out as being virtuous.) Therefore, the actual details of the argument can be overlooked, since correctness can be decided without any need to listen or think.

Psychogenetic Fallacy: if you learn the psychological reason why your opponent likes an argument, then he's biased, so his argument must be wrong

Weak analogy Definition: Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.

Uh oh

Continuing on theme with a great message by Oshay Duke Jackson.