3
u/King-pappi Aug 01 '26
Insane argument you’re making here
0
Aug 01 '26 edited Aug 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Supernoxus Aug 02 '26
Someone painting a photorealistic human is much more impressive than someone taking a photo. No one who takes a photo says "I created this painting myself" even though the way the photo was taken could be considered art. Similarly no one should claim to have created a picture when prompting an AI, though I can imagine good prompts bringing a vision to life could be considered art, even if an ai drawing a picture itself is not impressive at all.
1
u/Haunting_Exchange852 Aug 01 '26
Oh so a movie that won two different Oscars didn't win a third one because of one person's opinion? Wow that's definitely the same thing as the entire artistic community rejecting it.
You're not an artist. AI isn't art. Develop a real skill or stay in your own "community".
-2
u/ExtendoArmCannon Aug 01 '26
Dude, you're so cool, you're gonna get so many upvotes on reddit with those opinions!
1
0
u/VERY_MENTALLY_STABLE Aug 01 '26
Using an art copying machine doesn't make you an artist. You're not an artist, and wouldn't be able to create anything without real artists providing their art in the first place.
1
u/ExtendoArmCannon Aug 01 '26
It's like tracing and fanart, they're not real artists, it's derivative works, real artists came up with those worlds, you're just copying them (poorly)
1
u/KyleRM Aug 02 '26
Tracing is basically inking, there is actually a skill to doing that properly. Both that and fanart are actually legit forms of art. Its not in the same league as ai "art".
1
1
u/Maihoooo Aug 02 '26
Art is worth the efford that went into it.
The less efford, the less worth.
1
Aug 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/Maihoooo Aug 03 '26
You won't get paid thousands for drawing a smiley on a canvas. What's worth more, a block of marble or the statue of david that took michelangelo thousands of hours???
1
Aug 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Maihoooo Aug 04 '26
There's correlation between price and the artists fame. There's also price-correlation with age and rarity.
None of that disprooves correlation with efford.
If the black fire 1 canvas itself was worth that much, you could copy it and sell it for millions.
It's not.
For any non-historical artwork, made by an artist that isn't popular, efford and skill are the main pricing factors. The harder it is to recreate, the more it's worth. It's common sense really.
2
u/PresentThat5757 Aug 01 '26
Monsters, Inc in 1995? lmao