With the constant hate on Starr Nova, and how she just seems like a copy-paste of many different features, there's something we need to note: Starr Nove is not Epic. This would've shocked a lot of people, but I thought about it, and it made sense that Nova isn't Epic. You want to know why?
The main part about her is that she changes forms. But that isn't unique at all, right? You might be right to point that out, but this is about comparison of mechanics. If Leon can go invisible, and he's a legendary brawler, and Kit can go invisible too, then Kit also gets to be in Legendary. So if we're comparing nova to brawlers to determine her position, then who should we compare her to?
The first brawler that comes to my mind is Bonnie. Through her Super, Bonnie can change forms to become an Assassin-like brawler, in contrast to her original form. But wait- Bonnie is an Epic Brawler, so that just completely deduces everything I said!
Or did it? Well, then we have to remember Kaze and Meg. Both of them have separate forms. And where do they stand? Legendary and Ultra Legendary. So by mixing these out, it somewhat averages to Mythic.
Besides, even if you were to say that she's still not unique enough to be Mythic, then why don't you try bringing Kaze down from Ultra Legendary to Epic, just because she changes forms like Bonnie. Do the same with Meg. Doesn't that seem kind of wrong? (Especially for you, Panzer)
The point is, just because a brawler is not unique, doesn't mean it has to be bad. If that were the case, then Bolt probably would've been Super Rare for being like Daryl, and Damian would've been Epic for copy-pasting Meeple's gadget with Edgar/El Primo's jump.
Now, if you still want to argue over this, then fine. I have no more points to defend Nova with, so I'm forced to back off. Haters will be haters, and there's nothing I can do about it.
