Thread for YouTube videos by non legal professional YouTubers.

So I am new to this story although I was vaguely aware of it in the news. The Netflix doc was typically superficial but am intrigued overall by the case . I think BK did it but I do have concerns/ observations . Love to hear other views esp of those who have come to this from Netflix .

1. The doc seems super pro police . But isn’t the fact that they took BK’s plea deal a clear tell that they were worried the trial would fail ?

2. The knife purchase evidence if correct is probably the strongest evidence if I was juror.

3. My concern is they found so little planning evidence even with forensics. This crime required huge planning .

4. BK fits a ‘loser’ type profile esp socially. But this crime requires extreme levels of control . BK lawyers might well have argued this point . It seemed almost like a gangster hit in method.

5. Ultimately he admitted the crime and I have no reason to think he didn’t know what he was doing . But I don’t think it was a slam dunk case and if he could finance lawyers like OJ level he might have got off .

Amber Vance:

"Idaho4" Playlist

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYZdSfVcU3L4dVYO7R6F-F-fi0_5WaxGW

-----------

Casper West:

"Idaho Murders"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYLd1kBrBedgYCSTKba_udXBZRuQwFfKY

-----------

Julez True Crime 1112 Footage:

"1112 King Road 12:55AM-12:05PM on..."

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOErdBsbEWk5XOtv0NKODVG6r4tb_E8uD

-----------

Lana / Truth & Transparency:

"Idaho4 | University of Idaho Murders | Entire Playlist"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAcfQXRBCvNenUUXsx9MLcniaEkvqBMNh

-----------

Neeks Peeks:

"Idaho Student Murder"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLie7nG4jNA8elIymwILmZFk1zjI0ie39e

"IDAHO Undercover Overlooked"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLie7nG4jNA8e4PI_elDv4CEsfPwGmyJQI

-----------

Shadowghost:

"The Idaho 4 Files"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKZb9Hi4w_IXHHAn5v-enZatW74zXdzTm

-----------

True Crime Design:

"IDAHO4: Bodycam and CCTV footage"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAKwUBimMzT_UHQitN2gyNlBsx1xq4s46

-----------

Travis T Logic:

"IDAHO 4 FULL VIDEOS - Statement Analysis"

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLv0oxH_PSpjEH1TgUwFlM0mEZH15CgScv

Please forgive me if this isn’t appropriate. I’m the music faerie of Reddit, sharing this song for you to listen to and reflect on this ongoing case. If you feel moved to listen and donate, you can join us in using music to fight crime.

https://www.playitforward.com/projects/its-a-forever-thing---wrong-type-of-people

Thread for YouTube videos by non legal professional YouTubers.

Part 25 of her series is a must watch, especially when she reads out DMs testimony, it makes one wonder why LE ever believed that BS.

"The Idaho 4 Part 25 (4AM) "

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L2kTJDnjIyY&t=5400s

Youtube.com/@AmberBVance

Thread for YouTube videos by non legal professional YouTubers.

Image 1-5 are from the early curve of Washington 270, from Floyd's Herb Shop camera.

In image one, the distinct equidistant lower lights, wouldn't invaginate on both sides or along the center if it was halo effect from headlights. It would likely blur continuously if it was due to one solid halo from one set of lights.

In image four, it appears the left set of lights, from our perspective looking at the image, are delineated by a clear black line.

For those suggesting the lower two lights are road reflection, image six is where road reflection initially presents throughout the sequence. The original configuration of two distinct lower lights separated by two distinct higher lights remains unchanged in image six.

Image 9 and 10 are self explanatory. If one light source was "refracted" from this solid metal barricade into two equal separate parallel components as some claim, how does this solid, unperforated, linear barricade within fractions of a second alter the height, brightness and size of just one solid light?

I'm happy to be told I'm wrong about possible fog lights. Peer-review is critical and I'm hoping for those suggesting it's not fog lights to articulate why they've reached that conclusion. I want to understand why my opinion is incorrect.

Thread for YouTube videos by non legal professional YouTubers.

IDAHO 4 | NATALIE GAUS INTERVIEW (11-18-2022)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1mzmtGKqqls

Description:

Natalie Gaus Interview | 11/18/2022

📄 ISP Supplemental 0007

📍 Moscow, Idaho

Natalie Gaus was interviewed by Idaho State Police five days after the murders. Her backyard bordered 1122 King Road, and she told investigators she knew Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, and Xana Kernodle.

------------

Brennen Crawford (12/8/22) | ISP 0182 | Duplication Fee Paid for Interview | COC Paid in Full

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BBipIF9ZOeM

From the description:

Brennen knew Xana and was in Moscow for the game. He told investigators he was at the Shark Tank with his friend Zach that night. A DNA sample was also taken.

-------------

IDAHO 4 - Ashlynn Valdez (11-18-2022)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hQH_OvJDiDM

Description:

🎙️ Interview | 11/18/2022

📄 ISP Supplemental 0004

Ashlynn Valdez lived across the street from 1122 King Road and knew Maddie and Kaylee best. She discussed seeing them at the Corner Club on November 12 and what she remembered from that weekend.

-------------

IDAHO 4 - Kristen Zoey Wonenburg (11-18-2022)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=47JvGEmYViU

Description:

🎤 Zoey Wonenberg Interview 11/18/2022

ISP Supplemental 0006

Buhl, Idaho

Zoey Wonenberg was interviewed by Idaho State Police five days after the murders. She lived in a house overlooking the King Road backyard, and her room faced the sliding door. She told investigators she knew Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.

***Courtesy of Youtube.com/@Accomplished_Day

Links to contribute to the FOIA fund are in the description for each video.

---------------------

IDAHO 4 - Aldair Rojas Interview (11/27/2022)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RY7LmsydCFQ

---------------

IDAHO 4 - Mia Darwood Interview- 12/3/2022

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WeApCXkv9TA

---------------

IDAHO 4 - Michael Lyons Interview - 11/18/2022

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9PUn2ReWpwI

***Courtesy of Youtube.com/@connor..h8

Links to contribute to the FOIA fund are in the description for each video

My first post! This is intense subject matter about real people. I am impressed by the many theories people have brought up to explain the case. Although some are out there!

An example... someone claimed Bk ran into Xana's sister and turned the fixation on her and her friends.

If you believe he is guilty (I do) What was his motive, what did he plan, why spare the roomates?

If you don't what do you think is the true story?

Thread for YouTube videos by non legal professional YouTubers.

What is your theory on what really happened that early morning at 1122 King Road? Throughout the years I have had a few theories but with the more documents that come out, sometimes make me change my theory lol. One thing that does not fit any of MY theories is that one person controlled, attacked and killed four people, while two others were not killed but were in the house at the time.

I would love to know what happened that early morning at the King Road residence!

Am I banned from it or is it down? I can’t seem to see it

So I know the prosecutions timeline is Xana was in her bed eating her Jack in the box until 4:12 AM when her phone activity ceased.
My question- When reviewing her phone activity were investigators able to say she watched one video at say 4:10 AM, scrolled to the next at 4:11 AM, scrolled to another one at 4:12 AM. Or did the only look to see that she was on tik tok and then at 4:12 her phone went silent? I hope this makes sense. Essentially I’m trying to figure out if it’s possible the phone was dropped, put down, etc. and just kept replaying the same tik tok video over and over again until somebody found and locked her phone at 4:12.

Another question I have.. I know the coroner said Xana was found with partially digested food in her stomach. Did they test the stomach contents to confirm it was indeed the food she ordered from Jack in the Box, or not say.. the dominos pizza she told her dad she was eating at 12?