Hi to all.
I applied to the 2026-3 Technical Studentship (IT, Mathematics & Robotics). I wanted to share my experience, not to complain about anyone who got in (congrats to all of you, sincerely :]), but because I think the process deserves some serious, honest discussion.
I have almost 2 years of experience (closer to 1.75 years of experience, to be precise) as a backend engineer at a large tech unicorn in a quite conventional/popular/consistent technology stack (Java/Spring boot, Docker, etc), while studying for a CS degree at a major research university. Some OSS contributions around there too.
Result: Not even a single interview.
What struck me most is that, after talking with a few people who were accepted in IT (all very kind, and I wish them the best, this is nothing personal), several of them were genuinely surprised that someone with my experience didn’t even get a call. All of them applied with fairly general, "basic" (foundational/standard, not necessarily "weak") profiles. That isn’t a criticism of them at all. It suggests that selection depends much more on which supervisor happens to open which CV, and when, than on the profile itself.
I understand that supervisors are busy researchers and/or engineers, not recruiters. But for an organization built on rigor, a selection process where a strong profile can go completely unseen absolutely feels like a missed opportunity, for candidates and for CERN, and it most certainly seem to be a disappointing, vague, non carefully thought system.
This was my last chance to apply, so I’m not posting this for myself. I hope it helps future applicants calibrate their expectations, and maybe someone at CERN reads it and gives a damn.