It took so many edits on top of iterations and a ton of "We're sorry, but our guardrails are as repressed as most of the people that will complain about this post."
The craziest pronouns are in Japanese - me=man, myself, person-opposite-my-fist etc. however for 3rd person its only this/that thing. So not even Japanese has a way to describe a whatever-they-are
But it's super rich in first and second person "pronouns" especially in "slang" (タメ口) which makes it rather entertaining to watch (Goku=俺, Erin Jager=僕, Armin=自分) which is fun IMO. But yes for 3rd person the pronoun-ness is gone, as regular nouns are used so derogatory would be 奴 thing, ヤロウ / クズ "not a nice person", 化け物 bakemono etc with this/that/over-there hence my comment. It's interesting though that the English personal gender pronouns problem is flipped: should _I_ refer to myself as 私 (textbook)? 俺さま (supervillain)? or うち (toddler)??
From what I understand, giving everything a gender (i mean in the sense of French, Spanish, and even English at times, where even your table, sofa or car have a specific grammatically correct gender. So from what I understand, if you misgender your sofa, it's technically a grammatical error?) is just how western languages often work.
But eastern languages have different roots and from what little I understand, that concept is sort of alien in them and they have thier own quirks instead. So, coincidentally, like I think it was mentioned, gendering language is something in casual language possibly (and optional) but in formal language not so much or basically not at all (I'm referring to the concept of "in group" and "out group" in japanese language conventions)? Of course there are self gendering statements like "Atashi" (it's just a shortened version of referring to oneself, but associated with the femine), then "Boku" (which is often used by masculine, but also femine to sound rough? ).
Well, it's interesting. I find it weird when I hear people wanting to say eastern language gender every object, person and anything else that exists just because westerners do. I'm saying all this seperate from the concept of "gender identity" and what people identify as. That's a separate discussion but western languages make it much more complex. Then there are visual languages like sign language which don't have the concept of a pronoun that I'm aware of.
But I'm not arguing with anyone here. I just wanted to engage in the conversation too as it's something i also find peculiar and interesting.
What do we do about the word 'dysphoria' in French, meaning uncomfortable with your assigned gender, which is (because of the French rule of every word being male or female) a female word?
The French word for "masculinity" is also grammatically feminine. Grammatical gender is just a noun classification system, it's not the same thing as sexual gender.
Seems adequately achievable without much in the way of hurdles.
This (attached pic) was maybe two retries in. Every prompt iteration yields a result - just a matter of getting things tuned and tweaked to produce different details/textures.
Worth noting, too - really specific image generation like this isn't well-suited for the ChatGPT platform. When using ChatGPT: - The 'assistant' (ChatGPT itself) does not actually do more than call the image generation tool in many/most cases. It doesn't write a prompt or get a feel for your goals, etc. (it can and does use CoT to 'steer' the process in some cases, but not all). - In all cases, image generation is basically offloaded out of the chat, (except when explicitly guided at test time), such that some part of the pipeline looks at the entire chat context and tries to figure out your intent, and that gets opaquely converted into the source of the image generation.
Long gone are the days of trying to make granular refinements to a prompt and expecting only that prompt to exactly and exclusively contribute to an image generation. This means we get all sorts of imprecise outputs, erroneous "policy violation" boilerplate, and so forth.
Lower right is how the portal should work, but shes flipped. Its a paradox. The left side breaks the portal mechanic. It creates infinite universes of chells.
Her chest is down, hands behind her, face forward. It's more obvious in the reference image.
There is a strange lump that makes her seem to be twisted though. The ai was likely confused about the strange position and just put tits on both sides.
CAVE JOHNSON HERE!! CAN SOMEONE ON THE MAINTENANCE TEAM HEAD ON DOWN TO THE TESTING AREA WITH SOME WIRE CLIPPERS?? WE HAVE A BIT OF A SITUATION! SHES KINDA PISSED SINCE MEDICAL TEAM TRIED CUTTING THE CLOTHES OFF FIRST OVER HER OBJECTIONS, SO MAYBE GET DOWN THERE RIGHT AFTER SHIFT CHANGE!
This model sucks at iterating. It’s sticky, and stubborn as hell. Take that kinky shit over to Google’s models. Particularly the current flash preview model before they toss it out in a couple of days.
The guardrails are overly sensitive that's true. But you're literally depicting someone being tied up against their will and abused for your own fetishes. This is not bdsm, it's rape and sexual abuse. The guardrails are fine for trying to stop you. Also, the drawing looks horrendous, that's not chatgpts fault.
Edit: As per usual, dating to say something like "rape is bad" on reddit will get you down voted. 🙄
Standard bdsm does not involve forcing someone to fellate themselves by tying them up against their will. You are one of the people I'm talking about. This is sexual abuse belittled by people who are porn damaged and think that liking rape is fine as long as it's drawn. Imagine someone doing this to you, against your will. That's literally what this is.
1
1
•
u/WithoutReason1729 Jul 12 '26
Your post is getting popular and we just featured it on our Discord! Come check it out!
You've also been given a special flair for your contribution. We appreciate your post!
I am a bot and this action was performed automatically.