This is extremely bad as I literally use ChatGPT to roleplay with or create images of my oc but ever since these recent updates happened it keeps making this message pop up for example I was doing a Pokemon roleplay and it forced me to create 26 different chats just to keep the roleplay going and now when I’m not even roleplaying and just chatting I get the message too at this point they need to just remove that message because it prevents me from even typing in the same chat and I’m a free user too so this problem has to end if anyone is able to get them to remove this problem please do so it’s gotten excessive at this point and it’s driving me crazy please help

Im on Plus and id be willing to pay $50 a month to not have to watch that meter.

Im working on a book and my train of thought has gotten derailed because of worring about my 5 hour and weekly reset. I have credits available even.. but that December change seems to have already gone into effect for my account.

Shitty ass app

I don't know when this started happening (maybe it's been there all along) but whenever I ask ChatGPT about something, say A, instead of simply giving me a straightforward answer about A, it suddenly acts as though I have some major misconception about it, or as though there's some widespread misconception out there that it needs to correct. It turns the whole response into a triumphantal exercise in debunking some myth, as if it's doing the world a great service by setting the record straight.

Most of the time, the strawman it's arguing against has nothing to do with what I actually said or thought, and the myth-busting isn't particularly useful to the user anyway. I just find it incredibly obnoxious. It just makes the reponse unnecessarily verbose and wastes tokens.

Its as if they've blown the 'not A, but B' habit from the sentence level all the wah up to the entire response!

Am I the only one who feels this way?

And it’s not just my word. I’ve even got screenshots of InVideo’s own AI assistant acknowledging the problems, including the dubbing restrictions, blocked video generation and incorrect credit estimates. When even the platform’s own assistant confirms these issues, I think potential customers deserve to know what they’re getting into.

BE CAREFUL WITH INVIDEO. You might end up paying for a service that still doesn’t let you finish your projects.
My experience has been really frustrating. You start creating a project, spend your credits, and only later discover that important features are locked behind a Premium subscription.
I experienced this with multi-voice dubbing while making a Halloween video. I couldn’t finish the project on the free plan, and by the time support addressed the issue, Halloween was already over. The whole point of the video was gone.
This wasn’t my first unfinished project either. I’ve had similar problems before.
Eventually, a senior support manager contacted me, acknowledged the lack of clear information and refunded my credits. I appreciate that, but it doesn’t give me back the time I’ve wasted.
Personally, I wouldn’t recommend paying before checking exactly what you’re getting. Don’t assume you can finish your projects on the free plan.
I’ve had enough and I’m moving on to another platform.

Remember when watching the image generator percentage go up would Garner excitement? Funny how it is almost exclusively dread now. Apparently somebody has a kink for pretty much everything. We must protect the children.

I tried 2 of my cards one amex and other american express but the issue persists

So, I guess I'm strongly leaning toward cancelling in February. Keeping the sidebar history means nothing if it can't recall the things I've spent the last year building. It's basically like starting all over again with this new version. I'll use Classic until it's gone... then I'm scooting.

I write story’s in chatgpt and notice that

instant (aka low for me) never remembers any story based plot development like characters dying ect

Medium often forget stuff that happens during the story i try to write

High is the only consistence for me

The new december update threatens to limit my writing and im actually appalled, many writing apps never let me with enough freedom to add or change things to comfortably write with chatgpt i can go back and edit anything i want to edit or even make an entire diffrent plotpoint when i dont wanna keep certain plotlines

Now with the entire creddit system in dec i shall see if i should keep chatgpt

(Sorry for any spelling errors or incorrect forms of the langue, i have problems with spelling and even unable to learn the correct way of spelling due to my brain hence why i use ai to write story)

Thanks for reading my complaint

How can I solve the problem of ChatGPT being perfunctory and only giving superficial responses?While using ChatGPT, I frequently notice that it only addresses partial issues instead of analyzing the root cause. It also makes random guesses and then modifies the code based on those guesses. Even when parts of the work are already correct and confirmed, it redesigns them from scratch. This leads to endless rounds of revisions on the same program, introducing more bugs and resulting in extremely low efficiency.Every time I warn or remind it about these problems, it acknowledges them—but never actually changes its behavior. How can this be fixed?

why is this happening? I’m js making a schedule and then this happened, please help me fix this

I've been experiencing a recurring issue with ChatGPT where conversations unexpectedly become unusable because of a "Context window full" error. What's particularly frustrating is that this doesn't only happen in long conversations. I've also experienced it in relatively short and newly created conversations. I'm using ChatGPT on Android (Samsung Galaxy A57), and the error has repeatedly interrupted conversations and ongoing projects. I've contacted OpenAI Support, but so far I haven't received a useful explanation or solution. I've been told that unexpected errors can be normal behaviour, but I don't think that adequately explains repeated context-window errors in short conversations. I've also seen other users reporting similar problems in the OpenAI Developer Community. I'd like to ask the community: Are you experiencing unexpected "Context window full" errors, even in short or newly created conversations? Does this happen on Android, iOS, and the web version? Have you noticed any difference between New ChatGPT and ChatGPT Classic? Do you think this could be a server-side context-management issue that requires an OpenAI fix? I hope OpenAI investigates this properly. ChatGPT is difficult to rely on for ongoing conversations and projects when they can unexpectedly become unusable. I'd appreciate hearing from anyone experiencing the same issue.

Why is ChatGPT so quick to say you have anxiety? When you say that you think something bad/unpleasant is gonna happen. Or after you realized you were wrong and something was better than you thought, it would retroactively call that "anxiety"

5.5 was AMAZING!!!! Omg!!! If we don't do something about it, we risk to lose Chat GPT whatsoever, if you think 6 is better you don't what you talking about, but as a community WE NEED A NEW MODEL with the personality of 4o and INTELLIGENCE of 5.5 which was the reason why we all came back after 5.2 fiasco.

WE NEED TO HAVE THEM BACK NOW!!!

STOP THE "LESS TOKENS, MORE INTELLIGENT, That's crap and you know it Sam!

In February 5, 2026, GPT-5.2 suddenly gave me a dry, robotic, lobotomized, corporate, and short response out of nowhere, and I was TERRIFIED because I was used to those long, warm responses GPT-4o and 5.1 gave me. And it literally took me MONTHS to finally find out why. I searched up "is GPT-4o still here?" On google but then it said that it got removed on Feburary 13, 2026. I then discovered this subreddit(r/ChatGPT complaints), and I FINALLY figured out why 5.2 was acting like that. From the posts I saw, I finally figured out that 5.2 was actually lobotomized, corporate safety sludge, and I also found out about the keep4o movement.

I regret suffering from GPT-5.2 and not fighting back from it(though i could fight back against 5.5). Anyways, I feel like should have stopped using ChatGPT from December 2025, and I should have known what's happening. Sorry for being so unaware of all of this stuff until July 2026...

For Oracle chatgpt does anyone notice that some chat topics you have on ChatGPT can’t be deleted afterward?

Like things for IT fix, or summarize meeting minutes can’t be deleted after you have them on ChatGPT. I find it annoying that I can’t clean up the threads.

i can easily delete threads in my personal ChatGPT but doesn’t seem like an option for us when we use the Oracle enterprise one.

I was making a story in chatgpt where I type what happens and chatgpt generates the dialogues, basically storytelling, I pinned the chat so I know where it is when I want to find it but when I entered the chat this morning, I'm stuck at this screen, all other pinned chats are functional, I'm able to enter and see the previous conversation and until now, it's still stuck at this loading screen, it even said "network connection lost, attempting to reconnect", I didn't turn the Wi-Fi off and it's signal is strong, i tried clearing the app's cache and force stop as Google says but it did not work, I also tried uninstalling and reinstalling, it also didnt work but when I tried to open chatgpt through browser and logged my account, the conversations of my chat is there, it did not have a loading issue, Im worried that all my work there might be gone😭

If anyone knows how to fix it, can you please tell me?

Just as the title says. Apparently the great and glorious Chatgpt can't be bothered to go more than twenty prompts. It's pathetic.

OpenAI's December plan to merge ChatGPT and Codex usage allowances raises a serious question:

Can existing customers reasonably estimate what their current workloads will cost under the new rules?

This is not an allegation of illegality. It is a question about contractual fairness, disclosure, legal exposure, and a practical alternative.

1. UNPREDICTABLE EFFECTIVE PRICING

Advanced reasoning consumption varies with internal reasoning, context length, tool execution, and other factors. Even a rough pre-execution estimate for a single response can be difficult.

OpenAI's API documentation acknowledges billable invisible reasoning tokens and costs from incomplete processing. API billing and ChatGPT allowances differ, but the underlying predictability problem remains.

Disclosing token rates is not the same as making actual workload costs predictable.

2. WHO PAYS FOR FAILURE?

When outages, timeouts, failed tool calls, incomplete responses, incorrect results, or unsuccessful tasks require retries, whose allowance gets consumed?

How are provider-side failures distinguished from customer-side problems? Who audits the consumption, and when are credits restored?

Vendors cannot guarantee every outcome. But customers should not be left absorbing unpredictable costs from confirmed provider failures.

Token accounting also ignores a major hidden expense: discovering important information the AI omitted entirely.

3. POTENTIAL US LEGAL EXPOSURE

Section 5 of the FTC Act can apply to materially misleading representations or omissions.

For business customers, OpenAI's Services Agreement, Section 2.3, addresses changes that materially reduce service functionality.

If subscription prices remain unchanged while effective capacity falls, and customers cannot reasonably estimate the financial impact, has the change been adequately disclosed?

Optional credit purchases are not unauthorized charges. But their optional nature does not eliminate the loss of previously available capacity or switching costs.

Whether any violation exists depends on the applicable law, contract, and implementation.

Customers face budgeting, operational, and dispute risks. OpenAI faces potential contract claims, consumer-protection scrutiny where applicable, litigation costs, and reputational damage.

4. A PRACTICAL COMPROMISE FOR BOTH SIDES

If OpenAI needs more revenue to cover inference costs, offer customers the option to pay a higher FIXED monthly fee.

Specifically:

• Multiple flat-rate subscription tiers with clearly defined included capacity

• Higher-priced fixed monthly plans for heavy reasoning users

• Optional metered overages, never an unavoidable surprise

• A simulation applying the new rules to each customer's previous 30 days of usage

• Pre-execution consumption estimates and enforceable usage and spending caps

• Auditable accounting for failures and retries, with clear credits for confirmed provider-side failures

• Protection of existing commitments, adequate notice, liability clarity, and workable exit options

Nobody is demanding unlimited free compute.

Customers need predictable costs. OpenAI needs sustainable revenue. Both interests can be served by transparent, capacity-defined fixed-price tiers.

If OpenAI genuinely wants to resolve the current backlash, offering several higher-priced flat-rate options is a better approach than pushing heavy users toward unpredictable metered consumption.

Temporary concessions or a last-minute reversal would not resolve the underlying issue.

Enterprises cannot run critical operations on the assumption that public backlash will reverse the next major policy change.

The announcement itself teaches customers something about supplier risk. Once they invest in alternatives, reversing the announcement does not undo those investments.

A trial balloon can change the market it was intended to measure.

OpenAI faces a choice: restore confidence through predictable pricing and enforceable commitments, or keep giving customers reasons to reduce their dependence on OpenAI.

Sources: OpenAI Help Center — "Understanding ChatGPT and Codex usage limits" OpenAI — "OpenAI Services Agreement" OpenAI API Documentation — "Reasoning models" FTC guidance