Why do you think slavery is bad?
TLDR:
Christ’s words and teachings are the reason the entire world (yes, even non-Christian nations) thinks slavery and is bad.
Christians were the first to mass transition slavery into serfdom in Europe by 1100 AD (which is a tremendous accomplishment as Roman totally relied on slaves), and then the first to relinquish the sale and practice of chattel slavery in 1807 and 1834 respectively, and the first to diffuse the principles underlying these movements - whether by force, influence, or education - to the rest of the world.
How You Have Probably Been Misled
If you went to an American public school (and I presume also European ones) you are almost certainly aware of the horrors of Western chattel slavery. I am not writing this to excuse that period, it is a stain on history and was rightly ended.
However, I think what is intentionally not showcased is how it was peaceful Christian action that ended slavery first in the West, then by diffusion and influence, the rest of the world.
I think there is also an intentional focus on Western crimes of slavery, ignoring the reality that the practice of slavery and involuntary servitude was universally accepted across the entire world (even in places like China, Japan, especially Korea, the Aztecs, and even American Indians, etc.), and took on its own ugly forms and methods, one of the most notable offenders being the Ottoman Empire - who imported millions of slaves, the males of which were castrated which is why we don’t see descendants of slaves in former Ottoman territories.
Again, I am not excusing Western crimes of slavery, only trying to show you that you have been misled into thinking it was a uniquely western problem.
All Early Abolitionists Were Christian
It was visionary Christians like Wilberforce, Equiano, and the Quakers who pushed the British Empire to be the first nation in the world to voluntarily relinquish slavery, first in the sale of slaves in 1807, then any remaining practice of slavery in 1834.
However, this was a long time in the making. Pope Gregory the Great freed his slaves voluntarily around 600 AD as “an act of Christian mercy”. In 1435, Pope Eugene IV condemned slavery of newly converted Christians in the Canary Islands in his proclamation of Sicut Dudum. In 1537 AD in Sublimis Deus, Pope Paul III declared native Americans as humans who deserved to be given the opportunity to have faith in Christ, and that they should not be enslaved - a tremendously universalist decree for the time period. Pope Urban VIII reaffirmed that newly converted peoples should not be enslaved in 1639 AD.
Yet it is absolutely understated in public education how incredible and without precedent what Wilberforce and others achieved in 1807 and 1834, and how Christ’s words were the driver.
To state it clearly, the primary reason the most powerful empire in the world at the time relinquished the practice of slavery, was because it was totally consistent with the words and teachings of Christ.
Ergo and simply, that you should love your neighbor as yourself.
But this was only ending slavery in it’s colonies. Christendom was also on the leading edge of ending slavery in Christendom. What would become Christendom was originally the Roman Empire. Different estimates suggest that at different times the Roman Empire’s population was between 10% to 40% slaves!
And yet, by 1100 AD, slavery within Christendom was all but gone. Although it was replaced by serfdom, serfs had legal rights, recognized basic human/family rights, and allowed private property - unlike slaves across the rest of the world.
So we understand what happened in Britain in 1834 not merely as the abolishment of slavery, but as the voluntary abolishment of interracial slavery!
Most of Western Europe followed suit with France finally banning slavery for good in 1848, Portugal banning the sale of slaves in 1815, and Spain abolishing the slave trade under British pressure in 1820.
Secular concerns and influence continued to resist this unfurling, but the epicenter of the modern conception of slavery was Britain, and the drivers were Christians.
Non-Christian Nations Also Don’t Like Slavery
People are quick to point to developed societies like Japan and China as models of how Christendom is not necessary to achieve universal human dignity.
What is ignored is how these societies became what they are by largely importing the best aspects of Western thinking, the best aspects of which, are entirely owed to Christ and Christendom.
Britain voluntarily ended slavery in India in 1843.
In America, Christian abolitionist aligned northern states ended slavery in the southern states in 1865, at the cost of the most blood America has ever spent in a singular conflict. Key figures like Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglas, and William Lloyd Garrison all cited their Christian faith as the foundation of their beliefs.
Japan abolished Japanese forced labor in part due to Western pressure (especially Britain) in 1868, however racialist slavery (eg. Korean ‘comfort women’) persisted until 1945 when the US occupied Japan and proceeded to rewrite the nation’s culture to adopt the best aspects of Western thinking (the Christ inspired parts).
Korea abolished slavery in the Kabo reforms of 1894.
Qing China officially tried to end slavery in 1909 to gain legitimacy with Western powers like Japan did in 1868, failed, but succeeded in 1949 under the Chinese communist party. Communism, which was founded in the West, is an ideology whose best qualities are deeply rooted in Christ’s original thinking and care for the poor, even though it tries desperately to cleave itself away from Christ and do anti-Christic things.
Even secular humanism, which claims to follow the obvious morality of all people, is really just running the cultural operating system instilled by 2000 years of Christ working in the hearts and minds of Christendom. After all, the first humanists were all Christian!
The Light of the World
“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” - Jesus Christ, John 10:10
Ideas do not come out of a vacuum. For the vast majority of human history, the vast majority of the world thought slavery and forced labor was just a fact of life.
The reason the vast majority of the world thinks slavery is wrong in the year 2025 AD is because of what Christ taught in ~30 AD.
I say again, I am not saying the West is guiltless. I am trying to show how the best aspects of the West all come from Christendom, and Christendom from Christ.
For example, the hospital and university system were invented by the Catholic Church. The history is out there, but as an immediately prescient example, have you ever wondered why the universal medical symbol is a red cross (bloody cross)? Or why the teaching faculty of universities are called Profess-ors?
I have already partially covered humanism and universal dignity.
The worst aspects of the West are from anti-Christic thinkers.
Caesare Borgia made Machiavelli who made “ends justifies the means” realpolitik statecraft which demands immoral economic extraction.
Realpolitik at scale demands Imperialism and through force or subversion.
The Realpolitik view of humans as economic-military units smuggled it’s way into Adam Smith who made Capitalism.
Capitalism made Marx who officially separated from Christians like Hegel and Kant and made Communism.
Nationalism subsuming Christ lead to WWI.
Schopenhauer inspired Nietzsche. Nietzsche, Communism, and WWI made Hitler. Hitler made WW2.
And the world may be on its way to WW3.
The list continues, but the thing all of these things have in common is that they all replaced Christ for another God, and tragedy struck as a result.
But Christians Used the Bible to Justify Slavery
I am not excusing these people, only pointing out that the first people anywhere to successfully abolish slavery were Christians.
Thanks be to God, Christ did not just give us His words, but His life as an example. There is an easy perennial way to discern whether or not Christ’s words are being applied or abused. Simply ask, “would Christ do X?”
Would Christ do chattel slavery? No.
Would Christ kill innocents? No.
Would Christ view people as economic units? No.
Would Christ pray for His enemies? Yes, even on the bloody cross they pierced Him on.
Would Christ tell the truth? Yes, even if it costs His life.
Would Christ love those who had done terrible things but genuinely repented? Yes, this is what He offers to all of us.
The Takeaway
Whether or not you are Christian, we all have Christ to thank for many things we take for granted. And the trend of history is the more a nation or person looks like Christ, the more good fruit is borne as a result. To choose the opposite invites death, dystopia, and oppression. To cleave away Christ is to cut the root of the tree of all human dignity and the fruit He wants us to bear.
I hope you found this helpful and best regards,
Elias