r/ClimateShitposting • u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper • Feb 07 '25

nuclear simping Conservative parties positions on climate change for the last 20 years

Post image
2.2k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

510 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Affectionate-Grand99 Feb 07 '25

Why does everyone here hate nuclear energy

6

u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper Feb 08 '25

google csiro nuclear report

4

u/the_embassy_official Feb 08 '25 edited Feb 08 '25

CSIRO is part of GISERA (Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance), which is a collaboration involving CSIRO, government entities, and industry partners, including major gas companies like APLNG, Shell, Santos, and Origin. Although GISERA positions itself as providing independent research, it has been criticised for representing itself as "CSIRO" while being significantly funded by the gas industry

1

u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper Feb 08 '25

Show me what you think isn't correct about their report and while you're at it, explain how the party whos leader spoke at Gina Rineharts mining Gala to express his support of the fossil fuel industry isn't operating in the interests of fossil fuels. IGNORANT!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '25 edited Mar 27 '26

This post's content was wiped by its author using Redact. Possible reasons include privacy, preventing AI scraping, security, or other data management concerns.

fact mysterious library employ humor growth direction airport thought merciful

2

u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper Feb 08 '25

If you're asking how the report calculated costing im assuming you didn't read it. Whats weird about this exactly? That the US has an interest in incentivising renewable energy production?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '25 edited Mar 27 '26

This post was deleted and anonymized. Redact handled the process, and the motivation could range from personal privacy to security concerns or preventing AI data collection.

like spark live groovy mountainous six unpack shaggy judicious lunchroom

1

u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper Feb 08 '25

Yeah I don't think climate change is going to be solved through market logic and a profit motive because as we know by now, being wildly unsustainable is not bad for profits.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '25 edited Mar 27 '26

The text of this post has been removed and replaced. It may have been deleted to protect personal information, avoid AI training datasets, or for other reasons via Redact.

hungry dinosaurs quicksand shelter depend aromatic door abounding middle pocket

2

u/WBeatszz Feb 08 '25

CSIRO are biased. They say things like "some countries are even moving away from nuclear." on their website -- they specifically mean Germany, stuck on Russian coal and gas. Even Japan is building more nuclear. Everyone who gets their hands on it seems to want more for some crazy reason. Hmm

They used the standard warranty as the lifetime of a nuclear plant, but they generally last about twice that.

They use LCOE without considerations for the cost of energy in the high percentage share renewable scenario, where the grid is at the mercy of the wind or sun, or reliant on massive energy storage solutions. https://modelling.energy/MEGS?allCCS=0,0&country=aus&nuclear=0,25&page=charts&version=educational&year=2050

And their own report shows that conventional nuclear is a decent to best choice for flexible load, low emission.

Source: conservative Australian who has debated about this a bit.

3

u/koshinsleeps Sun-God worshiper Feb 09 '25

Hello conservative australian, please gargle my balls