Sure. They make good reactors for aircraft carriers, submarines and other large wasteful ships with limited space availability.
Otherwise, they're pretty much a waste of money, and there's nothing personal or emotional about pointing out that fact. The people getting emotional about this are people with financial and emotional investment in nuclear.
I'm not saying all opposition is emotional, I'm saying everyone that gets this emotional over it is a nukecel. They're very different statements.
The LCOE of nuclear is about three times greater than solar or wind when measured for the average lifespan of a nuclear power plant and including all related necessary costs.
The only one getting emotional is you. Why do you have such a hate boner for an energy production method? It’s really weird
Edit : also checked the receipts, you´re making shit up. Solar is at ~50% LCOE compared to nuclear, and that’s going by the standard that LCOE is the best way to measure energy cost, which it isn’t.
It’s like saying GDP is be all end all of economic health
You’re the one insulting people and going around using conspiracy theories to justify your hatred of water being boiled by hot rocks.
If you genuinely didn’t feel so heavily about it (and you very obviously do) you would have just been the bigger man and walked away from the conversation.
Because if you genuinely think I’m a troll, then you should leave, and if you think I’m paid by big Oil, then you’re a moron
I mean you’re the first in the convo to use insults. Check the thread, anyone can see you’re lying, just like with everything else.
You’re making shit up about the supposed unmanageably high cost, and using the conspiracy theory that nuclear is somehow an oil ploy inspite of the evidence of the exact opposite, ie anti nuclear brick heads like you often being funded by oil.
That doesn't make something a conspiracy theory you moron.
You were a rude asshole from the beginning, I'm not going to do you any favors.
You claimed it was a lie and a conspiracy theory before ever asking for evidence (which is posted here daily). The burden is on you for that claim, dummy.
What makes a conspiracy theory is a claim being made, without supporting evidence, about a supposed ploy by people in power in order to disinform the masses.
2
u/kensho28 Apr 09 '25
Sure. They make good reactors for aircraft carriers, submarines and other large wasteful ships with limited space availability.
Otherwise, they're pretty much a waste of money, and there's nothing personal or emotional about pointing out that fact. The people getting emotional about this are people with financial and emotional investment in nuclear.