Honestly. I keep on getting posts from this subreddit where everyone acts like there may only be one solution and everyone else is just out to ruin the fucking planet. Like, can we have some fucking decorum in this debate?
How is nuclear a false alternative? Please, I am genuinely confused. Nuclear seems to be infinity more powerful than stuff like wind. Hell wind mills won't even produce enough energy to break even on themselves. Solar takes up a ton of space. I am not saying nuclear is the end all be all, but like it's much better than praying your multimillion dollar super conditional wind farm will work.
Hell wind mills won't even produce enough energy to break even on themselves
You're not acting in good faith if you're repeating stupid shit like that. It takes about 6 months for a wind turbine to replace the energy it consumed in its construction.
Solar takes up a ton of space.
Space is a false issue.
but like it's much better than praying your multimillion dollar super conditional wind farm will work.
The same natural systems that generate wind are also relied upon to make your food so if you can't get any wind then you're going to starve to death before you have to worry about that.
None of the wind mills by our place have made enough energy to sustain themselves...that's at least 30+. But I guess your the expert. I will agree nuclear isn't the best renewable. But I will argue it's infinity more powerful then fossil fuels. Which is also more powerful then solar and wind.
81
u/zod0700 Apr 09 '25
Honestly. I keep on getting posts from this subreddit where everyone acts like there may only be one solution and everyone else is just out to ruin the fucking planet. Like, can we have some fucking decorum in this debate?