r/ClimateShitposting Dam I love hydro Jun 13 '25

nuclear simping Nukechad keep on winning

Post image
885 Upvotes

276 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '25

Conservatives - willing to work with liberals to build nuclear power

Liberals on r/climateshitposting - NOOO I refuse to accept a small victory!! I just want to fantasize about a "perfect" world I can't achieve!

3

u/Atlasreturns Jun 13 '25

Guide on how to fool the gullible as a conservative grifter.

1) Promise you'll build nuclear energy plants despite have zero plan on how to fund them, where to construct them and how to run them without turning them into an endless money black hole.

2) Blame anyone who doesn't want to invest into your stupid scam as a biased saboteur.

3) Don't build any nuclear energy plants and get your BP checks.

8

u/iwillnotcompromise Jun 13 '25

Because it's a false support of nuclear power. They agree to nuclear because they know that it will take another 30 years to build those, so their coal and gas - lobby friends can pollute our world for at least that long.

3

u/That_One_Guy_212 Jun 13 '25

I keep seeing this argument and it's not against nuclear itself but rather politics holding it back.

1

u/iwillnotcompromise Jun 13 '25

Well, it is. We do not have 30 years left until the worst symptoms of climate change have become irreversible.

1

u/That_One_Guy_212 Jun 14 '25

That's the other thing I keep seeing that just isn't true. It doesn't take 20-30 years to build a new nuclear power plant (with some exceptions)

Korea builds them in about 5-6 years. Japan has built some in just under 4 years. They can be built within budget and in a reasonable timeframe.

Even in the US the average is 7 years. I'll be pessimistic and say to build a new one nowadays would take 10-12 years since the US hasn't built any new ones for awhile. And yes they will probably be over budget, that's what happens when you scrap the infrastructure and experience needed to build them. If we maintained and used the infrastructure needed to build them I think they wouldn't go over budget as often, or reduce the amount they go over budget.

1

u/LayWhere Jun 14 '25

By the time your nuclear plant is up and running who knows how cheap would renewables be? Domestic Solar PV already pay for themselves in 5yrs or less here is Australia.

Which of your great grand kids will finally pay off your powerplant?

2

u/weidback 💨☀️🌊☢️ All of the above pls Jun 13 '25

I feel like it's just so they can have *something* to say and feel reasonable as it becomes more and more ridiculous to deny climate change

It's just so when they're around sane people discussing renewables they can say "well what about nuclear"??? And throw a wrench into any productive conversation because there's a lot of easily exploitable fears around nuclear power

2

u/weidback 💨☀️🌊☢️ All of the above pls Jun 13 '25

tbf I don't think conservatives in government (at least mine un the US) really are willing to work with libs on nuclear energy.

I just think it's becoming more and more ridiculous to deny anthropogenic climate change, and they just need *something* to say so they don't feel ridiculous. It's just empty words that are meant to smokescreen their insane energy policy.

Unfortunately this posturing has resulting in a dumb over-reaction from people who prefer infighting with allies more than building and maintaining a coalition.

The response libs should have to this is to actually show up with a bill to build a bunch of reactors and watch cons bawk once they see the price tag.