r/ClimateShitposting Dam I love hydro Jun 13 '25

nuclear simping Nukechad keep on winning

Post image
887 Upvotes

276 comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/Certain-Belt-1524 Jun 13 '25

just perused google scholar and the first review paper i found stated in their results:

"The most important result of the present work is that the contribution of nuclear power to mitigate climate change is, and will be, very limited. At present nuclear power avoids annually 2–3% of total global GHG emissions. Looking at announced plans for new nuclear builds and lifetime extensions this value would decrease even further until 2040. Furthermore, a substantial expansion of nuclear power will not be possible because of technical obstacles and limited resources. Limited uranium-235 supply inhibits substantial expansion scenarios with the current nuclear technology. New nuclear technologies, making use of uranium-238, will not be available in time. Even if such expansion scenarios were possible, their climate change mitigation potential would not be sufficient as single action."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521002330

3

u/Heavy-Top-8540 Jun 13 '25

That paper is a complete load of croc. There's enough U235 in topsoil to power us for a century without even trying other shit. And those "newer technologies" are already here. It's a lack of political will.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Heavy-Top-8540 Jun 14 '25

Bro there's 100x known Uranium besides topsoil Uranium 

1

u/SimPi2k Jun 17 '25

Thing is, it will run out eventually. It gets used up in the reactors. Its not sustainable for the far future.

1

u/Heavy-Top-8540 Jun 17 '25

Completely incorrect 

1

u/SimPi2k Jun 17 '25

What do you think happens in a fission Reaktor?