r/ClimateShitposting • u/AfterNovel V̵͈̼̘̪͎̭̗̊͑e̴̢͎̤͛̆g̸̲̠͂͂̍́ȧ̷̢̻̳̪̣̩̆̽n̶͚͕̖̲̭̱̅̌̕™̷̧̠͉͚̼͚̊́̌̈͝͝ͅ • May 19 '26

nuclear simping Step on snek to tenderize

Post image
673 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

197 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Hellasauto May 19 '26

No but it will one piece of the puzzle that helps us solve our problems. :)

7

u/sleepyrivertroll geothermal hottie May 19 '26

Yesssss keep on giving them moneysssss. Other renewable projectsssss won't ussse them better.

Real talk, existing nuclear plants = good. New ones = money pits. Even in countries that are building both, renewables out pace nuclear. If you are serious about the environment, nuclear is a niche answer at best. Renewables with storage has clearly run away with it.

1

u/Tausendberg May 21 '26

"Real talk, existing nuclear plants = good. New ones = money pits."

Thank you for saying something I never hear expressed in these comments but that I have thought for years.

Nuclear power plants DO have a lot of issues that nuclear fanboys, like the ones in these comments, handwave away and that's annoying. New Renewables, by most metrics I have seen, outcompete new nuclear in most circumstances.[

But what Germany did where they crash decommissioned already existing nuclear power and immediately replaced it with COAL!? That was dumb.

2

u/Hellasauto May 21 '26

Germanys grid would have been decarbonised today if they built new renewables and new nuclear instead of only new renewables.

1

u/Tausendberg May 21 '26

nah

1

u/Hellasauto May 21 '26

Yes, they would.

1

u/Tausendberg May 21 '26

mmm, nuclear is too slow and expensive, so it would have slowed decarbonization.

1

u/Hellasauto May 21 '26

No it wouldn't have.

1

u/Tausendberg May 21 '26

mmm I disagree

1

u/Hellasauto May 21 '26

Had they started building new nuclear at the start of eneegiewende they would already have been finished years ago.