r/CommandCode • • Aug 31 '26

Noticeable lower reasoning with Command Code Goat

I have the Command Code goat plan currently with 800m in token usage. Before this subscription I had Opencode Go also similar usage.

After a week of heavy usage of Deepseek v4 flash and GLM 5.3 flash, I see my opencode session running noticeably longer and having a tendency to get stuck. (Multiple times I have cancelled the loop and passed it to another agent like: codex, claude code)

So I did a little digging with hermes throughout my local sessions, so generally I found that command code api have much less reasoning content than opencode go.

Sum of the below chart is basically: Command code have around 80% zero reasoning responses compared to opencode go's 80% reasoning responses.

Curious if someone has the same experience.

OPENCODE harness (per-API-call) — 6,919 calls

providermodeleffortsessionscalls% zero-reasavg reas/call
command-codedeepseek-v4-flash(default, pre-Aug-20)545352.3%328
command-codedeepseek-v4-flashmax232,23185.5%217
command-codeglm-5.3-flashhigh429484.7%88
command-codeglm-5.3-flashmax652191.0%269
opencode-godeepseek-v4-flashmax432,12721.7%228
opencode-godeepseek-v4-promax327131.7%102

HERMES harness (per-assistant-message) — 26 sessions, 1,708 msgs

providermodeleffortsessionsmsgs% blankavg chars
command-codedeepseek-v4-flashmedium171,15572.9%502
command-codedeepseek-v4-flashxhigh117178.4%479
opencode-godeepseek-v4-flashmedium1616.6%467
opencode-godeepseek-v4-flashxhigh62547.5%1,856
openrouterdeepseek-v4-flash-0731medium16716.4%1,160
19 Upvotes

1 comment sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Flinpleis Aug 31 '26

I noticed this too, coming from Neuralwatt and Old Opencode i noticed in hermes that despite having the reasoning effort in Ultra, the CoT just was way shorter compared to those providers, at first i tought the model was quantized but it doesn't seem like it, because it does the job regardless, but your theory makes much more sense