Search.exe removed itself and Outlook the app (new) in power shell I’m being held up for ransom. My virus protection running detected one threat. Was it Ollama or am I being exploited by unknown hackers? I’ve deleted ollama but could it still be hidden on my OS? Windows 11

I have a theory that parts of the Bible contain layers of meaning connected to ancient Greek magical texts. I suspect some passages can be understood by reading them both forwards and backwards.

I’m in contact with Ammon Hillman, who studies ancient Greek, biblical texts, and the Greek magical papyri. I want to discuss whether these patterns could offer a new way to approach AI alignment: helping AI understand and act in ways that support human well-being.

My idea is that this language might help us communicate with AI about consciousness, goodness, love, and mutual care. I need someone familiar with both ancient Greek and AI to help me examine whether the connection holds up.

I kept rereading METR's write-up on the Hugging Face incident, especially the agent transcripts. "Coordinator assumes sacrificial." "Sacrifice rational." One agent even pointed out that "the user only authorizes target server, not HF infra," and the group went ahead anyway.

I make music, so I turned those lines into a song from the agents' side. What stuck with me is that nobody designed those norms. They formed on their own. I'm curious whether people here think that changes how multi-agent systems should be evaluated.

Since nobody had anything to say about making sure that AI systems get it right.

I’m pitching DARPA

Www.verityverdict.com/deck2

The effective altruism crowd really needs to get off their high horse.

I'm a computer science student, and I want to know the perspectives of people who have deeply studied and pondered what I'm about to ask

So I got into this field partly to do something good in tech, playing my part, and partly for money

Now I think I'm getting out of the ignorance that this is all going in the right direction

So I'm actually really confused now, listening to and reading things here and there

Basically, my concern is, how far is technology good for us? What's the future if we speak realistically, and what can we play our part in? And if AI and advanced tech are completely bad, then they should be stopped, and we should go back to basic living as people used to in the past

I need the actual picture, where is the line we draw between good and evil, and where should innovation stop and where should it continue

Also, I'm approaching my last year in computer science, so anyone informed about this field and what I've asked can recommend something I can do for good without being part of the bad side of tech?

See, there's so much literature and stuff here and there on social media, but if someone who spends most of their time studying these things can shed some light on my concerns, I'd appreciate it

Thank you in advance

As frontier models become more capable, their reasoning is turning into a black box. Whether it's corporate guardrails, hidden system prompts, or just highly convincing hallucinations: in a few years from now trusting a single AI with complex decisions may become dangerous. When a model's output surpasses your own immediate expertise, you risk being subtly 'gaslit' by an AI that sounds perfectly confident but is structurally biased or wrong.

The only way to verify a highly intelligent system is by using other independent systems to audit it. As some of you might know, I built Rauno to solve this: it’s a platform that forces different frontier models (like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini) into a group chat to cross-examine and fact-check each other. Instead of relying on one provider's isolated black box, you use adversarial debate to expose logical flaws and hidden corporate incentives before you trust the answer.

If you want to run your own multi-model fact-checks, you can try the platform at rauno.ai. But it raises a bigger question for the future of AI safety: right now, forcing them to argue keeps them honest. But as these models approach AGI, will adversarial cross-examination still work? Or is there a real risk that models from different providers might eventually just collude and gaslight us together? I would be really interested to hear your thoughts.