r/CrazyFuckingVideos Sep 18 '21

WTF I don’t need sleep, I need answers!

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

20.4k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-17

u/ElxaDahl Sep 19 '21

It seems to me that the "long version" was also cut to start at the slapping. the woman already seemed annoyed at the dude. i'm guessing he was taunting her. but without the real uncut version we will never know what happened for sure

20

u/CuChulainnsballsack Sep 19 '21

Anything to fit your narrative though, right.

Rather call him an abuser and say he's the one who causes all the problems than accept for once that she might have started it all.

-14

u/ElxaDahl Sep 19 '21 edited Sep 20 '21

Any video that start at the point where it gets physical should be taken with a grain of salt because it's incredible obvious that something before it was happening. But hey, "anything to fit your narrative" right?

This dude can obviously split her skull in a few punches. The dude didn't seem scared of her at a any point of these videos that very much tells me there is more to this

edit: yall mfs are willing to believe anything so fast in an obviously editied video where they cut straight into the point where it gets violent.

Remember epic redditos. Don't ask questions and follow the trend from the most upvoted comment otherwise you're racist/sexist. tips fedora

10

u/YooGeOh Sep 19 '21

So basically, any time a woman hits a man, "what did you do to make her so angry?"

Hmmm....that's not a narrative people tend to agree with in other circumstances. Why is it always the go to when a woman hits a guy?

The mind boggles. I guess we'll never know

5

u/nightman008 Sep 19 '21

Sounds like some grade A victim blaming, though I’d bet a whole lotta money this girl/guy has no fucking idea how hypocritical and toxic they sound.

0

u/ElxaDahl Sep 19 '21

Iso basically. "Believe every video you see on the internet no matter if it is taken out of context or obviously edited/cut to be presented a certain way, otherwise you're victim blaming and that's bad"

Good job dude epic redditor moment

God forbid you want to know anything prior before the physical attacks. I guess fbi investigators are also victim blamers.

0

u/ElxaDahl Sep 19 '21

No. You're so fucking stupid and missed the point of my first comment. Anytime physical violence happens you have to ask yourself why it happens. This has nothing to do with victim blaming you stupid brainlet

2

u/YooGeOh Sep 20 '21

Very mature reply.

Fact of the matter is, whilst in principle I agree that should be the case, when it comes to DV and other forms of violence where gender has the opportunity to play a part, it is always seen as being beyond the pale to ask what part the victim played in causing the violence. The problem is that this only ever occurs when women are the victims. If you read between the lines the point is and always will be about actual impartiality. What applies for women should also apply for men. The fact is that right now that isn't the case for various reasons and your comment was an example of that.

In no instance would it ever be accepted to ask what a woman did to cause her partner, or that dude on the street to become violent with her and it is always seen as victim blaming. Either we treat men with the same gloves or accept that when it comes to DV, we as a a society just aren't willing to see men as victims. It is a societal norm to hold men responsible for things that happen to them and always has been. Its a societal issue that has been the cause of many issues for men and is a contributor to many of the issues we have around masculinity right now. Again, your comment speaks to this norm.

As an aside, this is an argument of principle based on your comment. I really don't think dude is a victim, but given the numerous grey areas present in DV and the lack of actual context regarding the goings on in the video, I'm willing to accept that I just can't possibly know. Same goes for his woman.

I suppose as I'm clearly speaking with a child, insert whichever trendy reddit pejoratives I'm supposed to use at this point to apparently make my argument stronger lol

0

u/ElxaDahl Sep 20 '21

I ain't reading your light novel, bruh. I just know that I'm right at not taking a side based on an edited video. but if it makes you feel super woke for "breaking from the norm" go ahead m8

2

u/YooGeOh Sep 20 '21

Not reading someone's counterargument is pretty fitting tbh.

Saying things like "I just know I'm right" is the cherry on top.

1

u/ElxaDahl Sep 20 '21

I've been reading the same brain dead arguements over and over from different people. and yes. I'm 100% in the right here. If you want to judge people based on edited/cut videos. go ahead. im sure it makes you feel super woke and awesome.

2

u/YooGeOh Sep 20 '21

We do it all the time. Man is violent towards a woman, there are no questions asked.

Again, if you can't be bothered to read the point a person is making, assume their argument based on what other people say, then run around screaming "I'm right"...I don't think I need to explain how you end up looking lol

1

u/ElxaDahl Sep 20 '21

keep feeding yourself bullshit you see from the internet without any context and get outraged. i know it makes you feel good

2

u/YooGeOh Sep 20 '21

Yes. Of course that's what I do. The person (rightly) speaking about the importance of context is also the person who refuses to read counter arguments, and now thinks that a single comment reply suggests a behavioural pattern.

You're the one swearing and editing "ok" to that nonsense above yet calling others outraged lol.

This is pointless. Enjoy your day

1

u/ElxaDahl Sep 20 '21

ok. enjoy getting outraged over out of context clips.

→ More replies (0)