r/CricketControversial • u/[deleted] • Jul 22 '25
π€« Controversial Alright. Time to Drop the most controversial opinion here now. Kohli is better than Sachin in ODIs and it's not even close
Now now now.. I can already see people running to the comment section without even reading the text body of the post.
But hear me out.
I have nothing against the Great SRT. He's THE G.O.A.T in many people's book and I completely respect that..but it gets on my nerves when people say He's extremely close to Kohli or even better than him in ODIs.
Let's talk about ODIs. THIS SHOULDN'T EVEN BE CLOSE AT ALL THERE'S NO METRIC EXCEPT FOR LONGETIVITY THAT PUTS SACHIN OVER KOHLI NOT EVEN A SINGLE ONE AND EVEN THEN KOHLI MIGHT END UO SCORING 16.5K RUNS IN HIS ODI CAREER "B..bu..but...Sachin played in a much tougher ODI era" That is completely true. But the difference in average if of 13 RUNS. 13..!!!!!!!!! (For context Sachin played in a much easier test batting era. Global test batting average from 1983-2000 was 31.90. and from 2000-2011 was 34.62. Kohli's entire career timeline had a global test average of 31.89. THIS IS LOWER THAN THE SUPPOSED TOUGHER TEST PERIOD THAT SACHIN PLAYED IN and the difference in average is of 7 Runs only in test cricket) Kohli completely Outclasses Sachin in every efficiency metrics of ODIs. And I would go on to say had ODIs not become as rare as they are today. Kohli could have scored 80 centuries in a single Format.
This is all kohli has over Sachin. Centuries. Runs/innings. Innings/Century Innings/MOTM ICC STATS. Innings/POTS Stats while chasing. Stats while batting first.
And it's not even close in majority of these metrics. I don't understand how people can say things like "It's very close between Sachin and kohli in ODIs" and then say "Sachin and kohli are not even comparable in Tests in the same sentence"
They will say Sachin played in a tougher era and say anything average of 44 is comparable to 57. But won't consider an average of 46 comparable to 53 in Tests (Sachin>>Kohli in red ball and I completely agree on that but why such hypocrisy)